This article analyzes the causes and consequences of fiscal consolidation promise gaps, defined as the distance between planned fiscal adjustments and actual consolidations. Using 74 consolidation episodes derived from the narrative approach in 17 advanced economies during 1978–2015, the paper shows that promise gaps were sizeable (about 0.3% of gross domestic product per year or 1.1% of gross domestic product during an average fiscal adjustment episode). Both economic and political factors explain the gaps: for example, greater electoral proximity, stronger political cohesion and higher accountability were all associated with smaller promise gaps. Finally, governments that delivered on their fiscal consolidation plans were rewarded by financial markets and not penalized by voters.
Afonso A and João J (2014) Assessing fiscal episodes. Economic Modelling 37: 255–270.
2.
AfonsoASilvaJ (2015) The track record of fiscal forecasting in the EU. Economics Bulletin35(2): 1318–1329.
3.
AlesinaAOBarbieroCFaveroFet al. (2015) Austerity in 2009–2013. Economic Policy30(83): 383–437.
4.
Alesina A and Perotti R (1995) Fiscal expansions and fiscal adjustments in OECD countries. NBER Working Paper, No. 5214.
5.
AltJLassen (2006) Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review50(6): 1403–1439.
6.
Angelopoulos K, Malley J and Philippopoulos A (2012) Optimal taxation and the skill premium. CESifo Working Paper, No. 3706.
7.
AuerbachAJGorodnichenkoY (2013) Corrigendum: Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy5(3): 320–322.
8.
Baldacci E and Kumar M (2010) Fiscal deficits, public debt, and sovereign bond yields. IMF Working Paper, WP/10/184.
9.
Beetsma R, Giuliodori M and Wierts P (2009a) Budgeting versus implementing fiscal policy in the EU. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 7285.
10.
BeetsmaRGiuliodoriMWiertsP (2009b) Planning to cheat: EU fiscal policy in real time. Economic Policy24: 753–804.
11.
BeetsmaRBluhmBGiuliodoriMet al. (2013) From budgetary forecasts to ex-post fiscal data: Exploring the evolution of fiscal forecast errors in the European Union. Contemporary Economic Policy31(4): 795–813.
12.
Beetsma R, Cimadomo J, Furtuna O, et al. (2015) The confidence effects of fiscal consolidations. ECB Working Paper, No. 1770.
13.
BischoffIGohoutW (2010) The political economy of tax projections. International Tax and Public Finance17(2): 133–150.
14.
BrenderADrazenA (2008) How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries. American Economic Review98(5): 2203–2020.
15.
Cai X and den Haan W (2009) Predicting recoveries and the importance of using enough information. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 7508.
16.
CerraVSaxenaSC (2008) Growth dynamics: The myth of economic recovery. American Economic Review98(1): 439–457.
17.
ChatagnyFSoguelN (2012) The effects of tax revenue budgeting errors on fiscal balance: Evidence from the Swiss Cantons. International Tax and Public Finance19(3): 319–337.
18.
ClarkWRGolderMGolderSN (2002) Fiscal policy and the democratic process in the European Union. European Union Politics3(2): 205–230.
19.
Crivelli, Gupta ES and Mulas-Granados C (2016) Fragmented politics and public debt. IMF Working Paper 16/190.
DebrunXHaunerDKumarMS (2009) Independent fiscal agencies. Journal of Economic Surveys23(1): 44–81.
22.
Devries P, Guajardo J, Leigh D, et al. (2011) A new action-based dataset of fiscal consolidation. IMF Working Paper, WP/11/128.
23.
Ericsson NR, Hendry DF and Prestwich KM (1997) The demand for broad money in the United Kingdom, 1878–1993. International Finance Discussion Papers, No. 596.
24.
Escolano J, Jaramillo L, Mulas-Granados C, et al. (2014) How much is a lot? Historical evidence on the size of fiscal adjustments. IMF Working Paper, WP/14/179.
25.
Frankel J (2011) A solution to fiscal procyclicality: The structural budget institutions pioneered by Chile. NBER Working Paper, No. 16945.
26.
GasparVSGuptaMulas-GranadosC (2017) Fiscal Politics, Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
27.
GoldbachRFahrholzC (2011) The euro area's common default risk: Evidence on the commission's impact on European fiscal affairs. European Union Politics12(4): 507–528.
28.
GrangerCWJTerasvirtaT (1993) Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
HeinemannF (2006) Planning or propaganda? An evaluation of Germany's medium-term budgetary planning. Finanzarchiv: Public Finance Analysis62(4): 551–578.
30.
HeinemannFMoessingerMDYeterM (2018) Do fiscal rules constrain fiscal policy? A meta-analysis. European Journal of Political Economy51: 69–92.
31.
HendryD (1995) Dynamic Econometrics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
HübscherEThomasS (2017) “Fiscal consolidation under electoral risk.”. European Journal of Political Research57(1): 151–168.
33.
JordáO (2005) Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review95(1): 161–182.
34.
Jordà, Ò and A Taylor (2013) The time for austerity: estimating the average treatment effect of fiscal policy. NBER Working Papers, No. 19414.
35.
KlompJde HaanJ (2013) Political budget cycles and election outcomes. Public Choice157(1–2): 245–267.
36.
Leal T, Pérez JJ and Vidal JP (2007) Fiscal forecasting lessons from the literature and challenges. ECB Working Paper Series, No. 843.
37.
MierauJJong-A-PinRde HaanJ (2007) “Do political variables affect fiscal policy adjustment decisions? New empirical evidence.”. Public Choice133(3): 297–319.
38.
Morris R and Schuknecht L (2007) Structural balances and revenue windfalls – the role of asset prices revisited. ECB Working Paper, No. 737.
39.
Mulas-Granados C (2003) The trade-off between growth & equality and the economic impact of alternative fiscal adjustment strategies in the EU. European Economy Group Working Paper, No. 20/2003.
40.
Mulas-GranadosC (2004) Voting against spending cuts: The electoral costs of fiscal adjustments in Europe. European Union Politics5(4): 467–493.
41.
Mulas-GranadosC (2006) Economics, Politics and Budgets: The Political Economy of Fiscal Adjustments in Europe, London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
42.
MüllerWCStrømK (1999) Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
PelzmanS (1992) Voters as fiscal conservatives. The Quarterly Journal of Economics107(2): 327–361.
44.
PerottiR (1998) The political economy of fiscal consolidations. Scandinavian Journal of Economics100(1): 367–394.
45.
PerottiRKontopoulosY (2002) Fragmented fiscal policy. Journal of Public Economics86: 191–222.
46.
PotrafkeN (2011) Does government ideology influence budget composition? Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Economics of Governance12(2): 101–134.
47.
PotrafkeN (2017) Partisan politics: The empirical evidence from OECD panel studies. Journal of Comparative Economics45(4): 712–750.
48.
Przeworski A, Stokes SC and Manin B (Eds.) (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
RomerCDRomerDH (1989) Does monetary policy matter? A new test in the spirit of Friedman and Schwartz. NBER Macroeconomic Annual4: 121–184.
50.
RomerCDRomerDH (2010) The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. American Economic Review100(3): 763–801.
51.
SadehT (2006) Adjusting to the EMU: Electoral, partisan and fiscal cycles. European Union Politics7(3): 347–372.
52.
TufteER (1978) Political Control of the Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
VolkerinkBde HaanJ (2001) Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy: New evidence. Public Choice109(3–4): 221–242.
54.
Von Hagen J, Hallett AH and Straucht R (2001) Budgetary consolidation in EMU. Economics Papers, 148, Brussels, European Commission.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
