Leading theories of local responses to immigration claim that ideology drives policy differences. However, these studies focus exclusively on policy adoption, neglecting whether or not ideological preferences also govern the extent to which local actors choose to cooperate with federal immigration initiatives. To account for this shortcoming, I use zero-inflated negative binomial regression to assess county-level deportations resulting from local participation in the Secure Communities program. I find that existing financial and structural resources as well as financial incentives are strong determinants of county deportation levels. Furthermore, there is no evidence to suggest that conservative counties produce more deportations. Instead, the size of a county’s policing budget moderates the relationship between ideological orientations and deportation outcomes. With federal-local policy partnerships on the rise, these findings provide an important foundation for developing a better framework to understand the implications of such partnerships for policy implementation. In short, this article suggests that although policy adoption may be a politicized process, local compliance with federal initiatives is highly dependent on the resource constraints and incentives of the actors involved.
BaickerKatherineJacobsonMireille. 2007. “Finders Keepers: Forfeiture Laws, Policing Incentives, and Local Budgets.” Journal of Public Economics91:2113–36.
2.
BarrilleauxCharlesFeiockRichardCrewRobert E.Jr.1992. “Measuring and Comparing American States’ Administrative Characteristics.” State and Local Government Review24 (1): 12–18.
3.
BarryMichael. 2008. “Memo from Lieutenant Michael Barry, Martin County Sheriff’s Office to Major Steve Chase, Re Immigration Procedures.” Florida_ORR_0153. Public record obtained by the Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center. http://www.fiacfla.org/fiacsecurecommunities.html (accessed February 24, 2015).
4.
BeckettKatherineEvansHeather. 2013. “Immigration Detainer Requests in King County, Washington: Costs and Consequences.” Report Commissioned by the Northwest Defenders Association, Seattle.
CarsonBethanyDiazEleana. 2015. “Payoff: How Congress Ensures Private Prison Profit with an Immigrant Detention Quota.” Grassroots Leadership Report, Austin.
7.
ChaconJennifer M.2012. “The Transformation of Immigration Federalism.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal21 (2): 577–618.
8.
ChandDaniel E.Schreckhise.William D.2015. “Secure Communities and Community Values: Local Context and Discretionary Immigration Law Enforcement.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41:1621–43.
9.
ChavezJorge M.ProvineDoris Marie. 2009. “Race and the Response of State Legislatures to Unauthorized Immigrants.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science623 (1): 78–92.
10.
ChinGabriel J.MillerMarc L.2011. “The Unconstitutionality of State Regulation of Immigration through Criminal Law.” Duke Law Journal61 (2): 251–314.
11.
ChoChung-LaeKelleherChristine A.WrightDeil S.YackeeSusan Webb. 2005. “Translating National Policy Objectives into Local Achievements across Planes of Governance and among Multiple Actors: Second-Order Devolution and Welfare Reform Implementation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15 (1): 31–54.
12.
Corrections Corporation of America. 2015. “Find a Facility.” http://www.cca.com/locations (accessed April 5, 2015).
13.
CoxAdam B.Miles.Thomas J.2013. “Policing Immigration.” The University of Chicago Law Review80 (87): 87–136.
14.
CreekHeather M.YoderStephen. 2012. “With a Little Help from Our Feds: Understanding State Immigration Enforcement Policy Adoption in American Federalism.” Policy Studies Journal40 (4): 674–97.
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 2009. Secure Communities Standard Operating Procedures. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security.
FacchiniGiovanniMaydaAnna Maria. 2009. “Does the Welfare State Affect Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants? Evidence across Countries.” Review of Economics and Statistics91 (2): 295–314.
Federation for American Immigration Reform. 2010. “Immigration Facts: Public Opinion Polls on Immigration.” http://www.fairus.org/facts/public-opinion (accessed September 15, 2015).
Government Accountability Office. 2014. “State and Local Governments Fiscal Outlook: 2014 Update.” Released December17, 2014. http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/667624.txt (accessed September 20, 2015).
HasenfeldYeheskelBrockThomas. 1991. “Implementation and Social Policy Revisited.” Administration & Society22 (4): 451–79.
30.
HilbeJoseph M.2014. Modeling Count Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HillMichaelHupePeter. 2002. Implementing Public Policy. London: Sage.
32.
HopkinsDaniel J.2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 40–60.
33.
JaegerJillian. forthcoming “The Price of Immigration Enforcement: Intergovernmental Service Agreements, Detention Profits, and the Human Cost.” Working Paper. Available upon request from author.
34.
JonesRobert E.Dunlap.Riley E.1992. “The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: Have They Changed Over Time?”Rural Sociology57 (1): 28–47.
35.
KaganMichael. 2015. “Immigration Law’s Looming Fourth Amendment Problem.” Georgetown Law Journal104: 125–170.
36.
KeiserLael R.SossJoe. 1998. “With Good Cause: Bureaucratic Discretion and the Politics of Child Support Enforcement.” American Journal of Political Science42 (4): 1133–56.
37.
KingGaryRoberts.Margaret E.2015. “How Robust Standard Errors Expose Methodological Problems They Do Not Fix, and What to Do About It.” Political Analysis23:159–79.
LaufenbergScott D.1998. “The Struggle of Cities to Implement the Safe Drinking Water Act in the Context of Intergovernmental Relations.” Drake Journal of Agricultural Law3:495–546.
40.
LipskyMichael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage.
MazmanianDaniel A.Sabatier.Paul A.1983. Implementation and Public Policy. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.
43.
McGuireMichael. 2006. “Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It.” Public Administration Review66 (s1): 33–43.
44.
McLaughlinMilbrey WallinTalbert.Joan E.2001. Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
MeierKenneth J.O’TooleLaurence J.2006. “Political Control versus Bureaucratic Values: Reframing the Debate.” Public Administration Review66 (2): 177–92.
46.
MeulemanBartDavidovEldadBilliet.Jaak2009. “Changing Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A Dynamic Group Conflict Theory Approach.” Social Science Research38 (2): 352–65.
47.
MilesThomas J.Cox.Adam B.2014. “Does Immigration Enforcement Reduce Crime? Evidence from Secure Communities.” Journal of Law & Economics57 (4): 937–73.
NewmanBenjamin J.JohnstonChristopher D.StricklandApril A.CitrinJack. 2012. “Immigration Crackdown in the American Workplace: Explaining Variation in E-Verify Policy Adoption across the U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly12 (2): 160–82.
O’TooleLaurence J.2000. “Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10 (2): 263–88.
53.
PasselJeffrey S.CohnD’Vera. 2011. “Unauthorized Immigrant Population: National and State Trends, 2010.” Pew Hispanic Center. http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/reports/133.pdf (accessed September 22, 2015).
54.
PollansMargot J.2015. “The Safe Drinking Water/Food Law Nexus.” Pace Environmental Law Review32 (2): 501–10.
55.
RamakrishnanS. KarthickWongTom. 2010. “Partisanship, Not Spanish: Explaining Municipal Ordinances Affecting Undocumented Immigrants.” Pp. 73-96. In Taking Local Control: Immigration Policy Activism in U.S. Cities and States, ed. VarsanyiMonica. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
56.
RayMarcella R.ConlanTimothy J.1996. “At What Price? Costs of Federal Mandates since the 1980s.” State & Local Government Review28 (1): 7–16.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2011. “Labor Force Data by County, 2011 Annual Averages.” http://www.bls.gov/lau/laucnty11.txt (accessed April 20, 2015).
66.
U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2010a. “Selected Social Characteristics in the United States. Table DP02.” Generated using American FactFinder. http://factfinder2.census.gov (accessed January 1, 2016).
U.S. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. 2010. Racial Profiling and the Use of Suspect Classifications in Law Enforcement Policy. 111th Cong., 2nd sess., June17.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. n.d.-a. “FOIA Library: 287(g)—Memorandums of Agreement/Understanding.” https://www.ice.gov/foia/library (accessed March 3, 2015).
WeilandPaul S.1998. “Unfunded Environmental Mandates: Causes, Burdens, and Benefits.” Harvard Environmental Law Review22:283–311.
77.
WeissertCarol S.1994. “Beyond the Organization: The Influence of Community and Personal Values on Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Responsiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory4 (2): 225–54.
78.
ZingherJoshua N.2014. “The Ideological and Electoral Determinants of Laws Targeting Undocumented Migrants in U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly14 (1): 90–117.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
