Why do legislators choose to vote ‘Abstain’ instead of ‘Yea’ or ‘Nay’? Is it because they shy away from taking sides when facing competing demands? We address this question by studying roll-call vote data on the sixth European Parliament. In line with our principal–agent approach, we find that Members of the European Parliament are prone to strategically abstain when torn between different positions of their national party, their transnational party group, and their country’s minister. Abstentions are thus not random but strategic and ignoring them may bias the findings of legislative studies.
CarrubbaCJGabelMMurrahL (2006) Off the record: Unrecorded legislative votes, selection bias and roll-call vote analysis. British Journal of Political Science36: 691–704.
2.
CohenLRNollRG (1991) How to vote, whether to vote: Strategies for voting and abstaining on congressional roll calls. Political Behavior13(2): 97–127.
FiorinaMP (1974) Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
5.
ForgetteRSalaBR (1999) Conditional party government and member turnout on senate recorded votes, 1873–1935. The Journal of Politics61(2): 467–484.
6.
HagemannSHoylandB (2008) Parties in the council?Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1205–1221.
7.
HixS (2002) Constitutional agenda-setting through discretion in rule interpretation: Why the European parliament won at Amsterdam. British Journal of Political Science32(2): 259–280.
8.
HixSNouryAGRolandG (2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament, New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
HoogheLBakkerRBrigevichA (2010) Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning. European Journal of Political Research49(5): 687–703.
10.
Imai K, King G and Lau O (2008) Logit: Logistic regression for dichotomous dependent variables. In: Imai K, King G and Lau O (eds) Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software. Available at: http://GKing.harvard.edu/zelig.
11.
KingGZengL (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis9: 137–163.
12.
LindstädtRSlapinJBVander WielenRJ (2011) Balancing competing demands: Position taking and election proximity in the European parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly36(1): 37–70.
13.
LoJ (2013) Voting present: Obama and the Illinois senate 1999–2004. Sage Open3: 1–14.
14.
LongleyN (2003) Modeling the legislator as an agent for the party: The effects of strict party discipline on legislator voting behavior. Contemporary Economic Policy21(4): 490–499.
15.
MühlböckM (2012) National versus European. Party control over members of the European parliament. West European Politics35(3): 607–631.
16.
MühlböckM (2017) Voting Unity of National Parties in Bicameral EU Decision-Making. Speaking with One Voice?, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
NouryAG (2004) Abstention in daylight: Strategic calculus of voting in the European parliament. Public Choice212: 179–211.
18.
OtjesSvan Der VeerH (2016) The Eurozone crisis and the European parliament’s changing lines of conflict. European Union Politics17(2): 242–261.
19.
PooleKLewisJLoJ (2011) Scaling roll call votes with wnominate in R. Journal of Statistical Software42(14): 1–21.
20.
RosasGShomerY (2008) Models of nonresponse in legislative politics. Legislative Studies Quarterly33(4): 573–601.
21.
RosasGShomerYHaptonstahlSR (2015) No news is news: Nonignorable nonresponse in roll-call data analysis. American Journal of Political Science59(2): 511–528.
22.
RothenbergLSSandersM (1999) Rational abstention and the congressional vote choice. Economics and Politics11(3): 311–340.
23.
RothenbergLSSandersMS (2000) Legislator turnout and the calculus of voting: The determinants of abstention in the U.S. Congress. Public Choice103: 259–270.
24.
ScullyR (1997) Policy influence and participation in the European parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly22(2): 233–252.
25.
ThierseS (2016) Going on record: Revisiting the logic of roll-call vote requests in the European parliament. European Union Politics17(2): 219–241.
26.
Wessels B (1999) Whom to represent? Role orientations of legislators in Europe. In: Schmitt H and Thomassen J (eds) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.209–234.
27.
Willumsen D and Öhberg P (2013) Strategic abstentions in parliamentary voting. In: 3rd Annual General Conference of The European Political Science Association, Barcelona, Spain, 20–22 June 2013, pp. 1–24. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2225149 (accessed 15 February 2017).
28.
YordanovaN (2011) The effect of inter-institutional rules on the division of power in the European parliament: Allocation of consultation versus codecision reports. West European Politics34(1): 97–121.
29.
YordanovaN (2013) Organising the European Parliament: The Role of Committees and Their Legislative Influence, Colchester: ECPR Press.
30.
YordanovaNMühlböckM (2015) Tracing the bias in roll call votes: Party group cohesion in the European parliament. European Political Science Review7(3): 373–399.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
