This article analyses the impact of electoral institutions on the re-election campaigning and outreach strategies of Members of the European Parliament on the Twitter social media platform. Social media offers politicians a means to contact voters remotely and at low cost. We test the effect of diverse national proportional representation electoral institutions in European elections on a possible online electoral connection. We draw upon an original dataset of Members of the European Parliament Twitter activity before, during, and after the 2014 European elections. Our results confirm that variation in electoral institutions leads to meaningful differentiation in representatives' social media campaigning, which is further affected by national party, voter and legislator characteristics. Representatives make constructive use of Twitter, but there is no sustained online electoral connection.
Bakker R, Edwards E, Hooghe L, et al. (2015) 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Available at: www.chesdata.eu (accessed 1 October 2015).
2.
BowlerSFarrellDM (1993) Legislator shirking and voter monitoring: Impacts of European parliament electoral systems upon legislator-voter relationships. Journal of Common Market Studies31(1): 45–69.
3.
BowlerSFarrellDM (2011) Electoral institutions and campaigning in comparative perspective: Electioneering in European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research50(5): 668–688.
4.
Brooker P, Barnett J, Cribbin T, et al. (2015) Have we even solved the first ‘big data challenge?’ Practical issues concerning data collection and visual representation for social media analytics. In: Snee H, Hine C, Morey Y, et al. (eds) Digital Methods for Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Guide to Research Innovation. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.32–50.
5.
CareyJMShugartMS (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439.
6.
Chorus Analytics (2014) Chorus Tweetcatcher Desktop. Available at: http://chorusanalytics.co.uk (accessed 5 March 2015).
7.
CorbettRJacobsFShackletonM (2011) The European Parliament, 8th ed. London: John Harper Publishing.
8.
Cunningham K and Hix S (2014) PollWatch.eu Project, March–May 2014. Unpublished dataset.
9.
DanielWT (2015) Career Behaviour and the European Parliament: All Roads Lead Through Brussels?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Döring H and Manow P (2015) Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. Development version. Available at: http://www.parlgov.org (accessed 25 September 2015).
11.
European Commission (2014) Eurobarometer 80.1 (2013) ZA5876 Data file Version 1.0.0, Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
FarrellDMScullyR (2005) Electing the European Parliament: How Uniform are ‘Uniform’ Electoral Systems?Journal of Common Market Studies43(5): 969–984.
14.
FarrellDMScullyR (2010) The European Parliament: One parliament, several modes of political representation on the ground?Journal of European Public Policy17(1): 36–54.
15.
FarrellH (2012) The consequences of the internet for politics. Annual Review of Political Science15(1): 35–52.
16.
GattermannKVasilopoulouS (2015) Absent yet popular? Explaining news visibility of Members of the European Parliament. European Journal of Political Research54(1): 121–140.
17.
GervaisBT (2015) Incivility online: Affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment. Journal of Information Technology and Politics12(2): 167–185.
18.
GibsonRKRömmeleA (2009) Measuring the professionalization of political campaigning. Party Politics15(3): 265–293.
19.
GieblerHWüstAM (2011) Campaigning on an upper level? Individual campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament elections in its determinants. Electoral Studies30(1): 53–66.
20.
GolbeckJGrimesJMRogersA (2010) Twitter use by the U.S Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61(8): 1612–1621.
21.
GrahamTBroersmaMHazelhoffK (2013) Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters. Information, Communication and Society16(5): 692–716.
22.
HixSHagemannS (2009) Could changing the electoral rules fix European Parliament elections?Politique Europénne28: 28–42.
23.
HixSMarshM (2007) Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament elections. The Journal of Politics69(2): 495–510.
24.
HixSMarshM (2011) Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: An analysis of European Parliament elections across time. Electoral Studies30(1): 4–15.
25.
HoboltSB (2014) A vote for the president? The role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections. Journal of European Public Policy21(10): 1528–1540.
26.
HoboltSBHøylandB (2011) Selection and sanctioning in European Parliamentary Elections. British Journal of Political Science41(3): 477–498.
27.
HoboltSBSpoonJJ (2012) Motivating the European voter: Parties, issues and campaigns in European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research51(6): 701–727.
28.
JacksonNLillekerD (2011) Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies17(1): 86–105.
29.
KruikemeierS (2014) How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior34: 131–139.
30.
KruikemeierSvan NoortGVliegenthartR (2013) Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication28(1): 53–66.
31.
LassenDSBrownAR (2011) Twitter: The electoral connection?Social Science Computer Review29(4): 419–436.
32.
LillekerDGKoc-MichalskaK (2013) Online political communication strategies: MEPs, E-representation, and self-representation. Journal of Information Technology and Politics10(2): 190–207.
33.
LillekerDGKoc-MichalskaKSchweitzerEJ (2011) Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning. European Journal of Communication26(3): 195–213.
34.
Lorenzo RodríguezJGarmendia MadariagaA (2016) Going public against institutional constraints? Analyzing the online presence intensity of 2014 European Parliament election candidates. European Union Politics. 17(2): 303-323..
35.
MayhewD (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
PapacharissiZ (2004) Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media and Society6(2): 259–283.
37.
Peñalver GarcíaNPriestleyJ (2015) The Making of a European President, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
PopaSASchmittHHoboltSB (2015) EES 2014 Voter Study Advance Release Notes, Mannheim: MZES, University of Mannheim.
39.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections – A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3–44.
40.
SchmittHHoboltSBPopaSA (2015) Does personalization increase turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections. European Union Politics16(3): 347–368.
41.
SchmittHPopaSAHoboltSB (2015) European Parliament Election Study 2014. ZA5160, Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
42.
ScullyRFarrellD (2003) MEPs as representatives: Individual and institutional roles. Journal of Common Market Studies41(2): 269–288.
43.
SmallTA (2008) Equal access, unequal success major and minor Canadian parties on the net. Party Politics14(1): 51–70.
44.
Van der EijkCFranklinM (1996) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
45.
VergeerMHermansLCunhaC (2013) Web campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament elections: A cross-national comparative analysis. New Media and Society15(1): 148–148.
46.
VergeerMHermansLSamsS (2013) Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics19(3): 477–501.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
