The 2014 European Parliament elections were the first elections where the major political groups each nominated a lead candidate (Spitzenkandidat) for the Commission presidency in the hope that this would increase the visibility of the elections and mobilize more citizens to turn out. Using data from the 2014 European Elections Study, an EU-wide post-election survey, we analyse whether and how the presence of the lead candidates influenced the individual probability to participate in these elections. Our findings show that the recognition of the candidates increased the propensity to turn out, even when controlling for a host of other individual-level factors explaining turnout and the context factors known to facilitate participation. Furthermore, the campaign efforts of the lead candidates are associated with higher turnout levels and are reinforced by candidate recognition.
AECR (2014) Post EU Election Polling Project, Fieldwork conducted by AMR GmbH Dusseldorf, 25–26 May.
2.
BlondelJSinnottRSvenssonP (1998) People and Parliament in the European Union : Participation, Democracy, and Legitimacy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
BurnsNSchlozmanKLVerbaS (2001) The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: HarperCollins.
5.
EndersCKTofighiD (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods12(2): 121–138.
EvansJIvaldiG (2011) Deriving a forecast model for European election turnout. Political Research Quarterly65(4): 855–867.
9.
FollesdalAHixS (2006) Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies44(3): 533–562.
10.
FranklinMN (2001) How structural factors cause turnout variations at European Parliament elections. European Union Politics2(3): 309–328.
11.
FranklinMNHoboltSB (2011) The legacy of lethargy: How elections to the European Parliament depress turnout. Electoral Studies30(1): 67–76.
12.
GerberAGreenD (2000) The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review94(3): 653–663.
13.
HillygusD (2005) Campaign effects and the dynamics of turnout intention in election 2000. Journal of Politics67(1): 50–68.
14.
HixS (1997) Executive selection in the European Union: Does the commission president investiture procedure reduce the democratic deficit?European Integration Online Papers1(21): 1–15. Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/1997-021.pdf (acccessed 28 August 2014).
15.
HixS (1998) Choosing Europe: Real democracy for the European Union. EuroVisions: New Dimensions of European Integration, Demos Collection13: 14–17.
16.
HixS (2008) What's Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
17.
HixSLordC (1997) Political Parties in the European Union, London: McMillan.
18.
HixSMarshM (2007) Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament elections. The Journal of Politics69(2): 495–510.
19.
HoboltSB (2014) A vote for the president? The role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections. Journal of European Public Policy21(10): 1528–1540. .
20.
HoboltSBTilleyJ (2014) Blaming Europe? Responsibility Without Accountability in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
HolbrookTMMcclurgSD (2005) The mobilization of core supporters: Campaigns, turnout, and electoral composition in United States presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science49(4): 689–703.
22.
HoogheLMarksG (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration, Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
23.
HoogheLMarksG (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review97(02): 233–243.
24.
JacksonRA (1996) A reassessment of voter mobilization. Political Research Quarterly49(2): 331–349.
25.
JacksonRA (1997) The mobilization of U.S. State electorates in the 1988 and 1990 elections. The Journal of Politics59(02): 520–537.
26.
JacobsonGC (1992) The Politics of Congressional Elections, New York: HarperCollins.
27.
JonesJM (1998) Does bringing out the candidate bring out the votes?: The effects of nominee campaigning in presidential elections. American Politics Research26(4): 395–419.
28.
JoslynMCeccoliS (1996) Attentiveness to television news and opinion change in the fall 1992 presidential campaign. Political Behavior18(2): 141–170.
29.
KarpJABanducciSABowlerS (2008) Getting out the vote: Party mobilization in a comparative perspective. British Journal of Political Science38(1): 91–112.
30.
KingDMorehouseD (2004) Moving voters in the 2000 Presidential Campaign: Local visits, local media. In: SchultzD (ed.) Lights, Camera, Campaign! Media, Politics and Political Advertising, New York: Peter Lang Publishing Incorporated, pp. 301–318.
31.
KoopmansRStathamP (2010) The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
KriesiHGrandeE (2014) Political debate in a polarizing Union. In: CrammeOHoboltSB (eds) Democratic Politics in a European Union Under Stress, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–86.
33.
LarcineseV (2007) Does political knowledge increase turnout? Evidence from the 1997 British general election. Public Choice131(3–4): 387–411.
34.
LassenDD (2005) The effect of information on voter turnout: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Political Science49(1): 103–118.
35.
LeighleyJE (1995) Attitudes, opportunities and incentives: A field essay on political participation. Political Research Quarterly48(1): 181–209.
36.
LevenduskyMS (2011) Rethinking the role of political information. Public Opinion Quarterly75(1): 42–64.
37.
LodgeJ (1996) The 1994 Elections to the European Parliament, London: Pinter.
38.
McAllisterI (2007) The personalization of politics. In: DaltonRJKlingemannH-D (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 572–588.
39.
MarshM (1998) Testing the second-order election model after four European elections. British Journal of Political Science28(4): 591–607.
40.
MarshMMikhaylovS (2010) European Parliament elections and EU governance. Living Reviews in European Governance5(4): 5–20.
41.
MattilaM (2003) Why bother? Determinants of turnout in the European elections. Electoral Studies22(3): 449–468.
42.
MilnerHLadnerA (2006) Can PR voting serve as a shelter against declining turnout? Evidence from Swiss municipal elections. International Political Science Review/Revue Internationale de Science Politique27(1): 29–45.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections – a conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3–44.
46.
RosenstoneSJHansenJM (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America, New York: McMillan.
Schmitt H, Hobolt SB, Popa SA, et al. (2015) European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.5160.
49.
Shineman VA (2012) If you mobilize them, they will become informed: experimental evidence that information acquisition is endogenous to costs and incentives to participate. Paper presented at Northeastern Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
50.
SteinbrecherMRattingerH (2012) Explaining turnout in European Parliament elections. In: SandersDTókaGMagalhãesPC (eds) The Europeanization of National Polities?, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–109.
51.
Van der EijkCFranklinM (1996) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
52.
Van der EijkCSchmittH (2009) Legitimacy and electoral abstention in European Parliament elections. In: ThomassenJ (ed.) The Legitimacy of the European Union After Enlargement, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 208–224.
53.
VavreckLSpiliotesCJFowlerLL (2002) The effects of retail politics in the New Hampshire primary. American Journal of Political Science46(3): 595–610.
54.
VerbaSNieNH (1972) Political Democracy and Social Equality. Political Democracy and Social Equality, New York: Harper & Row.
55.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyHE (1995) Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 509–534.
56.
WesselsBFranklinMN (2009) Turning out or turning off: Do mobilization and attitudes account for turnout differences between new and established member states at the 2004 EP elections?Journal of European Integration31(5): 609–626.
57.
ZuckermanASDasovicJFitzgeraldJ (2007) Partisan Families: The Social Logic of Bounded Partisanship in Germany and Britain, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
