This article analyses to what extent and why national parliaments have created oversight institutions to adapt to European integration. Employing data from 22 member states from 1984–2006, the analysis suggests that government-supporting parliamentary groups create oversight institutions to enhance policy participation as integration becomes more important. Moreover, parliamentarians improve their access to information about government policy if governing parties are internally divided over European integration. Finally, oversight institutions that constrain the government’s discretion to act in European Union affairs exist in Eurosceptic countries, where they help parliamentarians to enhance electoral security.
AuelK (2007) Democratic accountability and national parliaments: Redefining the impact of parliamentary scrutiny in EU affairs. European Law Journal13: 487–504.
2.
AuelKBenzA (2005) The politics of adaptation: The Europeanisation of national parliamentary systems. The Journal of Legislative Studies11(3): 372–393.
3.
AuelKRaunioT(2012) Introduction: National parliaments, electorates and EU affairs. In: AuelKRaunioT (eds) National Parliaments, Electorates and EU Affairs, Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies, pp. 7–28.
4.
BarrettG (2008) National Parliaments and the European Union: The Constitutional Challenge for the Oireachtas and Other Member State Legislatures, Dublin: Clarus Press.
5.
BeckN (2001) Time-series–cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years?Annual Review of Political Science4: 271–293.
6.
BeckNKatzJN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. The American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.
7.
BergmanT (1997) National parliaments and EU affairs committees: Notes on empirical variation and competing explanations. Journal of European Public Policy4(3): 373–387.
8.
BergmanT (2000) The European Union as the next step of delegation and accountability. European Journal of Political Research37(3): 415–429.
9.
BörzelTA (2005) Mind the gap! European integration between level and scope. Journal of European Public Policy12(2): 217–236.
10.
ChristiansenFJPedersenRB(2011) ‘Europeanization’ and coalition patterns in minority parliamentary systems. In: PerssonTWibergM (eds) Parliamentary Government in the Nordic Countries at a Crossroads, Stockholm: Santérus, pp. 63–84.
11.
COSAC (2005) Third Bi-annual Report: Developments in the European Union Procedures and Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny. Available at: http://www.cosac.eu/documents/bi-annual-reports-of-cosac/ (accessed 19 November 2012).
12.
COSAC (2007) Eigth Bi-annual Report: Developments in European Union Procedures and Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny. Available at: http://www.cosac.eu/documents/bi-annual-reports-of-cosac/ (accessed 19 November 2012).
13.
COSAC (2009) Twelth Bi-annual Report: Developments in European Union Procedures and Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny. Available at: http://www.cosac.eu/documents/bi-annual-reports-of-cosac/ (accessed 19 November 2012).
14.
COSAC (2010) Thirteenth Bi-annual Report: Developments in European Union Procedures and Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny. Available at: http://www.cosac.eu/documents/bi-annual-reports-of-cosac/ (accessed 19 November 2012).
15.
DamgaardEJensenH (2005) Europeanisation of executive-legislative relations: Nordic perspectives. The Journal of Legislative Studies11(3): 394–411.
16.
de VriesCE (2007) Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale?: How European integration affects national elections. European Union Politics8(3): 363–385.
17.
de VriesCE (2010) EU issue voting: Asset or liability?: How European integration affects parties' electoral fortunes. European Union Politics11(1): 89–117.
18.
de VriesCEEdwardsEE (2009) Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public Euroscepticism. Party Politics15(1): 5–28.
19.
de VriesCEHoboltSB (2012) When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneurs. European Union Politics13(2): 246–268.
20.
de VriesCEvan der BrugWvan EgmondMH (2011) Individual and contextual variation in EU issue voting: The role of political information. Electoral Studies30(1): 16–28.
21.
de WildeP (2011) Ex ante vs. ex post: The trade-off between partisan conflict and visibility in debating EU policy-formulation in national parliaments. Journal of European Public Policy18(5): 672–689.
22.
DimitrakopoulosDG (2001) Incrementalism and path dependence: European integration and institutional change in national parliaments. Journal of Common Market Studies39: 405–422.
23.
DöringH (1995) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, Frankfurt: Campus.
24.
Döring H and Manow P (2010) Parliament and government composition database (ParlGov): An infrastructure for empirical information on parties, elections and governments – Version 10/02.
25.
FinkeD (2009) Domestic politics and European treaty reform: Understanding the dynamics of governmental position-taking. European Union Politics10(4): 482–506.
26.
FøllesdalAHixS (2006) Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies44(3): 533–562.
27.
FranchinoFHoylandB (2009) Legislative involvement in parliamentary systems: Opportunities, conflict, and institutional constraints. American Political Science Review103(4): 607–621.
28.
GabelMScheveK (2007) Mixed messages: Party dissent and mass opinion on European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 37–59.
29.
GoetzKHMeyer-SahlingJ-H (2008) The Europeanisation of national political systems: Parliaments and executives. Living Reviews in European Governance3(2).): Available at: http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2008-2 (accessed 18 November 2012).
30.
HansenTBSchollB (2002) Europeanization and domestic parliamentary adaptation – A comparative analysis of the Bundestag and the House of Commons. European Integration Online Papers6(15).): Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2002-015a.htm (accessed on 18 November 2012).
31.
HéritierA (2003) Composite democracy in Europe: The role of transparency and access to information. Journal of European Public Policy10: 814–833.
32.
HixS (1994) The study of the European community: The challenge to comparative politics. West European Politics17(1): 1–30.
33.
HixS (1999) Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responses. European Journal of Political Research35(1): 69–106.
34.
HixSLordC (1997) Political Parties in the European Union, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
HolzhackerR (2002) National parliamentary scrutiny Over EU issues: Comparing the goals and methods of governing and opposition parties. European Union Politics3(4): 459–479.
36.
HoogheLMarksG (2008) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(01): 1–23.
37.
HoogheLBakkerRBrigevichA (2010) Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning. European Journal of Political Research49(5): 687–703.
38.
HoogheLMarksGWilsonCJ (2002) Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies35(8): 965–989.
39.
KamCJ (2009) Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
KarlasJ (2012) National parliamentary control of EU affairs: Institutional design after enlargement. West European Politics35(5): 1095–1113.
41.
Kietz D (2006) What accounts for national divergence: The Baltic Parliaments in EU affairs. Paper presented at the EU-Consent PhD Summer School, Budapest, 29 April–5 May 2006.
42.
KiiverP (2006) The National Parliaments in the European Union – A Critical View on EU Constitution-Building, The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International.
43.
KönigTSlapinJ (2004) Bringing parliaments back in: The sources of power in the European treaty negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics16(3): 357–394.
44.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR (2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research45(6): 921–956.
45.
KroppSBucheJBuzogányA(2011) Parlamentarisch-exekutive Steuerung in europäisierten Fachpolitiken – ein Blick auf die Mikroebene. In: AbelsGEpplerA (eds) Auf dem Weg zum Mehrebenenparlamentarismus?, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 227–239.
LewisJ (1998) Is the ‘hard bargaining’ image of the council misleading? The committee of permanent representatives and the local elections directive. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies36(4): 479–504.
MarksGHoogheLBlankK (1996) European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies34(3): 341–378.
50.
MartinLL (2000) Democratic Commitments, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51.
MartinLWVanbergG (2004) Policing the bargain: Coalition government and parliamentary scrutiny. American Journal of Political Science48(1): 13–27.
52.
MartinLWVanbergG (2005) Coalition policymaking and legislative review. The American Political Science Review99(1): 93–106.
53.
Martin S and Depauw S (2011) The impact of multiparty government on the internal organization of legislatures. Paper presented at the 69th Annual National Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 31 March–3 April 2011.
54.
MattilaMRaunioT (2012) Drifting further apart: National parties and their electorates on the EU dimension. West European Politics35(3): 589–606.
55.
MaurerAWesselsW (2001) National Parliaments on their Ways to Europe: Losers or Latecomers, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
56.
MiklinE (2009) Government positions on the EU services directive in the council: National interests or individual ideological preferences?West European Politics32(5): 943–962.
57.
MüllerWCStrømK (2003) Coalition Governments in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
NortonP (1995) Conclusion: Addressing the democratic deficit. The Journal of Legislative Studies1(3): 177–193.
59.
NortonP (1996) National Parliaments and the European Union, London: Cass.
60.
O'BrennanJRaunioT (2007) National Parliaments within the Enlarged European Union: From ‘Victims’ of Integration to Competitive Actors?, New York: Routledge.
61.
PahreR (1997) Endogenous domestic institutions in two-level games and parliamentary oversight of the European Union. Journal of Conflict Resolution41(1): 147–174.
62.
PapadopoulosY (2003) Cooperative forms of governance: Problems of democratic accountability in complex environments. European Journal of Political Research42(4): 473–501.
63.
PlümperTTroegerVEManowP (2005) Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory. European Journal of Political Research44: 327–354.
64.
PollakJSlominskiP (2003) Influencing EU politics? The case of the Austrian parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies41: 707–729.
65.
RaunioT (1999) Always one step behind? National legislatures and the European Union. Government and Opposition34(2): 180–202.
66.
RaunioT (2005) Holding governments accountable in European affairs: Explaining cross-national variation. The Journal of Legislative Studies11(3–4): 319–342.
67.
RaunioT(2008) Ensuring democratic control over national governments in European affairs. In: BarrettG (ed.) National Parliaments and the European Union: The Constitutional Challenge for the Oireachtas and Other Member State Legislatures, Dublin: Clarus Press, pp. 3–28.
68.
RaunioT (2009) National parliaments and European integration: What we know and agenda for future research. The Journal of Legislative Studies15(4): 317–334.
69.
RaunioTHixS (2000) Backbenchers learn to fight back: European integration and parliamentary government. West European Politics23(4): 142–168.
70.
RayL (1999) Measuring party orientations towards European integration: Results from an expert survey. European Journal of Political Research36(2): 283–306.
71.
Rozenberg O (2002) The involvement of national parliaments in European Union affairs. An empirical test of two variables. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, 22–27 March 2002, Turin.
72.
SaalfeldT (2005) Deliberate delegation or abdication? Government backbenchers, ministers and European Union legislation. Journal of Legislative Studies11: 343–371.
73.
SchmidtVA (1999) European ‘federalism’ and its encroachment on national institutions. Publius29(1): 19–44.
74.
SchmidtVA (2006) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75.
SmithE (1996) National Parliaments as Cornerstones of European Integration, London: Kluwer Law International.
76.
SprungkC (2010) Ever more or ever better scrutiny? Analysing the conditions of effective national parliamentary involvement in EU affairs. European Integration Online Papers14(2).): Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/index.php/eiop/article/view/2010_002a (accessed 18 November 2012).
77.
StasavageD (2004) Open-door or closed-door? Transparency in domestic and international bargaining. International Organization58(4): 667–703.
78.
SteenbergenMMarksG (2007) Evaluating expert surveys. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 347–366.
79.
StrømK (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
80.
StrømK (2000) Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research37(3): 261–289.
81.
StrømKMüllerWC (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82.
StrømKMüllerWCBergmanT (2008) Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83.
TansOZoethoutCPetersJ (2007) National Parliaments and European Democracy: A Bottom-up Approach to European Constitutionalism, Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
84.
WeilerJHHHalternURMayerFC (1995) European democracy and its critique. West European Politics18(3): 4–39.
85.
Wessels B (2005) Roles and orientations of members of parliament in the EU context: Congruence or difference? Europeanisation or not? The Journal of Legislative Studies 11(3): 446–465.
86.
Winzen T (2010) Political integration and national parliaments in Europe. Living Reviews in Democracy.. Available at: http://www.livingreviews.org/lrd-2010-2015 (accessed 4 January 2011).
87.
WinzenT (2012) National parliamentary control of European Union affairs: A cross-national and longitudinal comparison. West European Politics35(3): 657–672.
88.
YläoutinenSHallerbergM(2009) The role of parliamentary committees in the budgetary process in Central and Eastern European countries. In: GanghofSHönnigeCSteckerC (eds) Parlamente, Agendasetzung, und Vetospieler, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 147–174.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
