What effect do online public consultations have on legislative duration in the European Union? While scholars are divided on whether consultations speed things up or slow things down, they agree that consultations affect how decision-makers think about legislative proposals. I argue that this is only part of the story: the impact of consultations on legislation duration is also a function of the administrative capacity of decision-makers and their staff to process consultation submissions. I test this argument using a unique data set of over 750 legislative proposals in the period 2009–2013. I find that consultations tend to have a negative impact on the time it takes to pass legislation. However, this negative effect is less pronounced when decision-makers have sufficient administrative capacity to process submissions.
BerganDE (2009) Does grassroots lobbying work? A field experiment measuring the effects of an e-mail lobbying campaign on legislative behavior. American Politics Research37(2): 327–352.
2.
BishopPDavisG (2002) Mapping public participation in policy choices. Australian Journal of Public Administration61(1): 14–29.
3.
BombergEStubbA (2008) The EU’s institutions. In: BombergEPetersonJStubbA (eds) The European Union: How Does it Work?, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–70.
4.
Box-SteffensmeierJJonesBS (2004) Event History Modeling. A Guide for Social Scientists Analytical Methods for Social Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BroscheidACoenD (2003) Insider and outsider lobbying of the European Commission An informational model of forum politics. Journal of European Public Policy20(1): 39–58.
Chalmers AW (forthcoming) Getting a seat at the table: Capital, capture and expertise in the European Union. West European Politics. DOI:10.1080/01402382.2013.852832.
9.
CrombezC (2002) Information, lobbying and the legislative process in the European Union. European Union Politics3(1): 7–32.
10.
DürADe BièvreD (2007) Inclusion without influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy. Journal of Public Policy27(1): 79–101.
11.
EdwardsHRHoeferR (2010) Are social work advocacy groups using web 2.0 effectively. Journal of Political Practice9(3–4): 220–239.
12.
European Commission (2002) Communication from the Commission: Consultation Document: Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue – Proposal for general principle and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission. COM (2002) 277 Final. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/civil_society/consultation_standards/docs/cont_hotrec.pdf (accessed 8 December 2013).
GiddensA (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
GolubJ (1999) In the shadow of the vote? Decision making in the European Community. International Organization53(4): 733–764.
17.
GolubJ (2007) Survival analysis and European Union decision-making. European Union Politics8(2): 155–179.
18.
GolubJ (2008) The study of decision-making speed in the Europen Union. Methods, data and theory. European Union Politics9(1): 167–179.
19.
GolubJSteunenbergB (2007) How time affects EU decision-making. European Union Politics8(4): 555–566.
20.
IrvinRAStansburyJ (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?Public Administration Review64(1): 55–65.
21.
KardashevaR (2009) The power to delay: The European Parliament’s influence in the consultation procedure. Journal of Common Market Studies47(2): 385–409.
22.
KlüverHSagarzazuI (2013) Ideological congruency and decision-making speed: The effect of partisanship across European Union institutions. European Union Politics14(3): 388–407.
23.
Kohler-KochBFinkeC (2007) The institutional shaping of EU-society relations: A contribution to democracy via participation?Journal of Civil Society3(3): 205–221.
24.
KönigT (2007) Divergence or convergence? From ever-growing to ever-slowing European legislative decision making. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 417–444.
25.
KönigT (2008) Analysing the process of EU legislative decision-making: To make a long story short. European Union Politics9(1): 145–165.
26.
MaurerA (2003) The legislative powers and impact of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies41(2): 227–247.
27.
QuittkatC (2011) The European Commission's online consultations: A success story. Journal of Common Market Studies49(3): 653–674.
28.
RasmussenAToshkovD (2013) The effect of stakeholder invovlement on legislative duration: Consultation of external actors and legislative duration in the European Union. European Union Politics14(3): 366–387.
29.
RehCBressanelliEKoopC (2013) The informal politics of legislation: Explaining secluded decision making in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies46(9): 1112–1142.
30.
SchulzHKönigT (2000) Institutional reform and decision-making efficiency in the European Union. American Journal of Political Science44(4): 653–666.
31.
SimonHA (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality. vol 2: Behavioral Economics and Business Organization, London: MIT Press.
32.
SlootTVerschurenP (1990) Decision-making speed in the European Community. Journal of Common Market StudiesXXIX(1): 75–85.
33.
TsebelisG (1995) Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicamerialism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science25(3): 289–325.
34.
TsebelisG (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, New York: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
