Does income inequality increase political backlash against European and global integration? This paper reports research suggesting that it can. The article analyses party opposition to and support for trade openness, European Union integration and general internationalism of political party platforms in advanced industrial democracies between 1960 and 2008. It finds that inequality tends to increase anti-globalization positions of parties, net of pro-globalization positions, an effect that does not significantly differ across party families or levels of actual globalization. This effect, however, does depend on, and is diminished by, generous redistributive policies. These findings clarify socio-economic conditions underlying the backlash against political and economic globalization.
AndersonCJSingerMM (2008) The sensitive Left and the impervious Right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies41(4–5): 564–599.
2.
ArzheimerKCarterE (2006) Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success. European Journal of Political Research45(3): 419–443.
3.
BeckfieldJ (2006) European integration and income inequality. American Sociological Review71(6): 964–985.
4.
BellLFreemanR (2001) The incentive for working hard: Explaining hours worked differences in the US and Germany. Labour Economics8(2): 181–202.
5.
BenoitKLaverMMikhaylovS (2009) Treating words as data with error: Uncertainty in text statements of policy positions. American Journal of Political Science53(2): 495–513.
6.
BetzH-G (1994) Radical Right-wing Populism in Western EuropeBasingstoke: Macmillan.
7.
BilalSGretherJ-MDe MeloJ (2003) Determinants of attitudes towards immigration: A trade-theoretic approach. Review of International Economics11(2): 253–267.
BräuningerT (2005) A partisan model of government expenditure. Public Choice125(3–4): 409–429.
10.
BudgeIHofferbertRI (1990) Mandates and policy outputs: U.S. party platforms and federal expenditures. American Political Science Review84(1): 111–131.
11.
BudgeIKlingemannHVolkensA (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments, 1945–98Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
Burns JK (2008) Xenophobia—Evolved ‘outgroup' hatred or product of a toxic social environment? South African Journal of Psychiatry 14(4): 120–121.
13.
CarterE (2005) The Extreme Right in Western Europe: Success or FailureManchester: Manchester University Press.
14.
De la ReyC (1991) Intergroup relations: Theories and positions. In: FosterDLouw-PotgieterJ (eds) Social Psychology in South Africa. IsandoLexicon27–56.
15.
DollardJDoobLMillerNE (1939) Frustration and AggressionNew Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
DreherA (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of Globalization. Applied Economics38(10): 1091–1110.
18.
DuckittJ (1994) The Social Psychology of PrejudiceWestport, CT: Praeger.
19.
DuttPMitraD (2005) Political ideology and endogenous trade policy: An empirical investigation. The Review of Economics and Statistics87(1): 59–72.
20.
FavellAGuiraudonV (2009) The sociology of the European Union: An agenda. European Union Politics10(4): 550–576.
21.
GerritsenDLubbersM (2010) Unknown is unloved? Diversity and inter-population trust in Europe. European Union Politics11(2): 267–287.
22.
GlickP (2005) On the Nature of PrejudiceOxford: Blackwell Publishing.
23.
GomezBTWilsonJM (2006) Rethinking symbolic racism: Evidence of attribution bias. Journal of Politics68(3): 611–625.
24.
GreenDPStrolovitchDZWongJS (1998) Defended neighborhoods, integration, and racially motivated crime. American Journal of Sociology104(2): 372–403.
25.
HaysJEhrlichSPeinhardtC (2005) Government spending and public support for trade in the OECD: A test of the embedded liberalism thesis. International Organization59(2): 473–494.
26.
HenjakA (2010) Political cleavages and socio- economic context: How welfare regimes and historical divisions shape political cleavages. West European Politics33(3): 474–504.
27.
Heston A, Summers R and Aten B (2002) Penn world table version 6.1. Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP).
28.
Hewstone J, Fincham FD and Jaspars M (1983) Attribution Theory and Research: Conceptual Developmental and Social Dimensions. New York: Academic Press.
29.
HixSLordC (1997) Political Parties in the European UnionLondon: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
HoogheL (2007) What drives Euroskepticism? Party-public cueing, ideology and strategic opportunity. European Union Politics8(5): 5–12.
31.
HoogheLMarksGWilsonC (2002) Does Left/Right structure party positions on European integration?. Comparative Political Studies35(8): 965–989.
32.
ImKPesaranMShinY (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics115(1): 53–74.
JackmanRWVolpertK (1996) Conditions favouring parties of the extreme Right in Western Europe. British Journal of Political Science26(4): 501–521.
35.
KapsteinE (1996) Workers in the world economy. Foreign Affairs75(3): 16–37.
36.
KelleyHH (1967) Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation15: 192–238.
37.
KenworthyL (1999) Do social-welfare policies reduce poverty? A cross- national assessment. Social Forces77(3): 1119–1139.
38.
KitscheltH (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe. A Comparative AnalysisAnn Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
39.
KlingemannH-DHofferbertRBudgeI (1994) Parties, Policies and DemocracyBoulder, CO: Westview Press.
40.
Klingemann H-D, Volkens A, Bara J, et al. (2007) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
KriesiH (2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research45(6): 921–956.
42.
LaverMBudgeI (1992) Party Policies and Government CoalitionsLondon: Macmillan.
43.
LaverMJGarryJ (2000) Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science44(3): 619–634.
44.
Leblond P and Hobolt SB (2009) Economic insecurity and support for the Euro. APSA 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto.
45.
LubbersMGijsbertsMScheepersP (2002) Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research41(3): 345–378.
46.
LupuNPontussonJ (2011) The structure of inequality and the politics of redistribution. American Political Science Review105(2): 316–336.
47.
MarksGHoogheLSteenbergenMR (2007) Cross-validating data on party positioning on European integration. Electoral Studies26(1): 23–38.
48.
MayhewD (1974) Congress: The Electoral ConnectionNew Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
McLarenL (2006) Identity, interests and attitudes to European integrationBasingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
MilnerHJudkinsB (2004) Partisanship, trade policy, and globalization: Is there a Left-Right divide on trade policy?. International Studies Quarterly48(1): 95–119.
51.
MorrisA (1998) Our fellow Africans make our lives hell: The lives of Congolese and Nigerians living in Johannesburg. Ethnic and Racial Studies21(6): 1116–1136.
52.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in EuropeCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Netjes CE and Edwards E (2006) Taking Europe to its extremes: Examining cueing effects of Right-Wing populist parties on public opinion regarding European integration. Best.-Nr. SP IV 2005-202 Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
54.
O'ConnellMF (2005) Economic forces and anti-immigrant attitudes in Western Europe: A paradox in search of an explanation. Patterns of Prejudice39(1): 60–74.
55.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2002) Social expenditures database. Various years. Historical statistics. Available at: www.sourceoecd.org (accessed July 2012).
OsbergLSmeedingT (2006) “Fair” inequality? Attitudes toward pay differentials: The United States in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review71(3): 450–473.
58.
RuggieJG (1982) International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization36(2): 195–231.
59.
Sánchez-CuencaI (2000) The political basis of support for European integration. European Union Politics1(2): 147–171.
60.
SoltF (2009) Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database. Social Science Quarterly90(2): 231–242.
61.
SteenbergenMREdwardsEEDe VriesCE (2007) Who’s cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 13–35.
62.
SwankDBetzH-G (2003) Globalization, the welfare state, and Right wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review1(2): 215–245.
63.
TajfelH (1981) Human Groups and Social CategoriesCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
TanasoiuCColonescuC (2008) Determinants of support for European integration: The case of Bulgaria. European Union Politics9(3): 363–377.
65.
TaylorDJaggiV (1974) Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology5(2): 162–171.
66.
TomzMKingGWittenbergJ (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 347–361.
67.
TshiterekeC (1999) Xenophobia and relative deprivation. Crossings3(2): 4–5.
68.
UslanerEM (2002) The Moral Foundations of TrustCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
Van der BrugWVan SpanjeJ (2009) Immigration, Europe and the ‘new’ cultural dimension. European Journal of Political Research48(3): 309–334.
70.
WeaverKR (1987) The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy6(4): 371–398.
71.
WeinerB (1992) Human Motivation: Metaphors, Theories and ResearchNewbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
ZA5234:2011 Eurobarometer Standard 73.4 (May 2010).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
