The COVID-19 pandemic proved the latest stress test for the European Union, after Brexit, the Eurozone crisis and the large influx of refugees. This highly relevant and well-timed special issue examines how past crises have left an imprint on the opinions and behaviour of ordinary citizens and political elites regarding the European Union. This Forum article reviews the special issue contributions by spelling out which lessons we can learn from each of them and which paths for future research they have opened up. In terms of a path forward, I argue that scholars ought to pay more attention to (a) the role of political elites, (b) political opportunity structures, and (c) heterogeneity both between and within member states.
BaccaroLBremerBNeimannsE (2021) Till austerity do us part? A survey experiment on support for the Euro in Italy. European Union Politics22(3): 401–423. DOI: 10.1177/14651165211004772.
3.
BörzelTARisseT (2018) From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy25(1): 83–108.
4.
BraunDSchäferC (2022) Issues that mobilize Europe: The role of key policy issues for voter turnout in the 2019 European Parliament elections. European Union Politics.
5.
De VriesCE (2017) Benchmarking Brexit: How the British decision to leave shapes EU public opinion. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies55(Annual Review): 38–53.
6.
De VriesCE (2018) Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
De VriesCEHoboltS (2020) Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.
De VriesCEHoboltSWalterS (2021) Politicizing international cooperation: The mass public, political entrepreneurs and political opportunity structures. International Organization75(2): 306–332.
9.
DinasERieraP (2018) Do European Parliament elections impact national party system fragmentation?Comparative Political Studies51(4): 447–476.
10.
GattermannKde VreeseC (2022) Understanding leader evaluations in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics.
11.
HoboltSBPopaSvan der BrugW, et al. (2022) The Brexit deterrent? How member state exit shapes public support for the European Union. European Union Politics.
12.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
13.
HoogheLMarksGWilsonCJ (2002) “Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies35(8): 965–989.
14.
KatsanidouAReinlA-KEderC (2022) Together we stand? Transnational solidarity in the EU in times of crises. European Union Politics.
15.
KruschinskiSBeneM (2022) In varietate concordia? Political parties’ use of digital political marketing on Facebook across 28 countries in the 2019 European election campaign. European Union Politics.
16.
MonnetJ (1976) Memoirs. Paris: Fayard.
17.
NaiAMedeirosMMaierM, et al. (2022) Euroscepticism and negative campaigning in the 2019 European Parliament election: A winning combination?European Union Politics.
18.
PellegataAViscontiF (2022) Voting for a social Europe? European solidarity and voting behaviour in the 2019 European elections. European Union Politics.
19.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections-a conceptual framework for the analysis of European Election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3–44.
20.
SteenbergenMREdwardsEEDe VriesCE (2007) Who is cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 13–35.
21.
Van der BrugWGattermanKde VreeseC (2022) Electoral responses to the increased contestation over European integration. The European elections of 2019 and beyond. European Union Politics.
22.
WalterS (2021) Brexit domino? The political contagion effects of voter-endorsed withdrawals from international institutions. Comparative Political Studies First DOI: 10.1177/0010414021997169.
