This study examines the role of European integration as a potential source of income inequality in countries of the European Union. We distinguish between both economic and political integration and identify theoretical mechanisms that link the two to rising levels of inequality. The empirical analysis draws on time-series-cross-section data covering 14 European Union member states for the time period 1999–2010. In particular, we make use of a newly available dataset that measures individual degrees of integration across different dimensions. Our main finding is a positive association between political integration and inequality on the one hand as well as a nonassociation between economic integration and inequality on the other hand. This suggests that the recent trend toward inequality at the European Union national level is at least partly related to deepening political integration at the supranational level.
Achen CF (2000) Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the political methodology section of the American Political Science Association, University of California, Los Angeles, 20--22 July 2000. Available at: http://www.polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/achen00.pdf (accessed 30 June 2013).
2.
AldersonASNielsenF (2002) Globalization and the great U-turn: Income inequality trends in 16 OECD countries. American Journal of Sociology107(5): 1244–1299.
3.
ArmingeonKEnglerSPotolidisP (2013) Comparative Political Data Set I 1960–2011, Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
4.
AtkinsonABBrandoliniA (2015) Unveiling the ethics behind inequality measurement: Dalton’s contribution to economics. Economic Journal125(583): 209–234.
5.
BeckNKatzJN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.
6.
BeckNKatzJN (1996) Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section models. Political Analysis6(1): 1–36.
7.
BeckNKatzJN (2011) Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data. Annual Review of Political Science14(1): 331–352.
8.
Beckfield J (2005) The consequences of regional political and economic integration for inequality and the welfare state in Western Europe. PhD Thesis, Indiana University, USA.
9.
BeckfieldJ (2006) European integration and income inequality. American Sociological Review71(6): 964–985.
10.
BeckfieldJ (2009) Remapping inequality in Europe: The net effect of regional integration on total income inequality in the European Union. International Journal of Comparative Sociology50(5–6): 486–509.
11.
BradleyDHuberEMollerS (2003) Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Politics55(2): 193–228.
12.
BradyD (2005) The welfare state and relative poverty in rich western democracies, 1967–1997. Social Forces83(4): 1329–1364.
13.
BurgoonB (2009) Social Nation and Social Europe: Support for national and supranational welfare compensation in Europe. European Union Politics10(4): 427–455.
14.
BusemeyerMR (2009) From myth to reality: Globalization and public spending in OECD countries revisited. European Journal of Political Research48(4): 455–482.
15.
BusemeyerMR (2015) Skills and Inequality: The Political Economy of Education and Training Reforms in Western Welfare States, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CaporasoJA (1976) The external consequences of regional integration for pan-European relations: Inequality, dependence, polarization, and symmetry. International Studies Quarterly20(3): 341–392.
17.
DreherAGastonN (2007) Has globalisation really had no effect on unions?KYKLOS60(2): 165–186.
18.
DreherAGastonN (2008) Has globalization increased inequality?Review of International Economics16(3): 516–536.
FalknerGHartlappMTreibO (2007) Worlds of compliance: Why leading approaches to European implementation are only ‘sometimes-true theories’. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 395–476.
21.
GarryJTilleyJ (2015) Inequality, state ownership and the European Union: How economic context and economic ideology shape support for the European Union. European Union Politics16(1): 139–154.
22.
HöpnerMSchäferA (2012) Embeddedness and regional integration: Waiting for Polanyi in a Hayekian setting. International Organization66(3): 429–455.
23.
IversenTSoskiceD (2006) Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review100(2): 165–181.
24.
IversenTSoskiceD (2009) Distribution and redistribution: The shadow of the nineteenth century. World Politics61(3): 438–486.
25.
JahnD (2006) Globalization as ‘Galton’s problem’: The missing link in the analysis of diffusion patterns in welfare state development. International Organization60(2): 401–431.
26.
JenkinsSPVan KermP (2009) The measurement of economic inequality. In: SalverdaWNolanBSmeedingTM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 40–69.
27.
KönigJOhrR (2013) Different efforts in European economic integration: Implications of the EU-Index. Journal of Common Market Studies51(6): 1074–1090.
28.
KorpiW (2003) Welfare-state regress in Western Europe: Politics, institutions, globalization, and Europeanization. Annual Review of Sociology29(1): 589–609.
29.
KosonenP (1995) European welfare state models: Converging trends. International Journal of Sociology25(1): 81–110.
30.
LeuffenDRittbergerBSchimmelfennigF (2012) Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
MahlerVA (2004) Economic globalization, domestic politics, and income inequality in the developed countries a cross-national study. Comparative Political Studies37(9): 1025–1053.
32.
MartinA (2004) The EMU macroeconomic policy regime and the European social model. In: MartinARossG (eds) Euros and European: Monetary Integration and the European Social Model, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 20–50.
33.
MartinARossG (2004a) Introduction: EMU and the European social model. In: MartinARossG (eds) Euros and European: Monetary Integration and the European Social Model, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–19.
34.
MartinARossG (2004b) Conclusions. In: MartinARossG (eds) Euros and European: Monetary Integration and the European Social Model, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 309–330.
35.
Moravcsik A (1994) Why the European Union strengthens the state: Domestic politics and international cooperation. Center for European Studies Working Papers Series 52. Available at: https://ces.fas.harvard.edu/files/working_papers/CES_WP52.pdf (accessed 24 June 2013).
36.
Pierson P (2006) The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics 48(2): 143–179.
37.
PlümperTTrögerVEManowP (2005) Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory. European Journal of Political Research44(2): 327–354.
38.
PollackMA (2005) Theorizing the European Union: International organization, domestic polity, or experiment in new governance?Annual Review of Political Science8(1): 357–398.
39.
PontussonJ (2005) Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe vs. Liberal America, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
40.
PontussonJRuedaDWayCR (2002) Comparative political economy of wage distribution: The role of partisanship and labour market institutions. British Journal of Political Science32(2): 281–308.
41.
RhodesM (1996) Globalization and west European welfare states: A critical review of recent debates. Journal of European Social Policy6(4): 305–327.
42.
RuedaDPontussonJ (2000) Wage inequality and varieties of capitalism. World Politics52(3): 350–383.
43.
ScharpfFW (1996) Negative and positive integration in the political economy of European welfare state. In: MarksGScharpfFWSchmitterPC (eds) Governance in the European Union, London: SAGE Publications, pp. 15–39.
44.
ScharpfFW (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
ScharpfFW (2002) The European social model: Coping with the challenges of diversity. Journal of Common Market Studies40(4): 645–670.
46.
ScheveKSlaugtherMJ (2004) Economic insecurity and the globalization of production. American Journal of Political Science48(4): 662–674.
47.
SmeedingTM (2005) Public policy, economic inequality, and poverty: The United States in comparative perspective. Social Science Quarterly86(Issue Supplement s1): 955–983.
48.
SolgaH (2014) Education, economic inequality and the promises of the social investment state. Socio-economic Review12(2): 269–297.
49.
StreeckWSchmitterPC (1991) From national corporatism to transnational pluralism: Organized interests in the Single European Market. Politics and Society19(2): 133–164.
50.
ThomsonR (2010) Opposition through the back door in the transposition of EU directives. European Union Politics11(4): 577–596.
51.
ThomsonRTorenvliedRArreguiJ (2007) The paradox of compliance. Infringements and delays in transposing EU directives. British Journal of Political Science37(4): 685–709.
52.
VisserJ (2013) The ICTWSS Database: Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 Countries Between 1960 and 2011, Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute of Advanced Labour Studies.
53.
WallersteinM (1999) Wage-setting institutions and pay inequality in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science43(3): 649–680.
54.
WilsonSEButlerDM (2007) A lot more to do: The sensitivity of time-series cross-section analyses to simple alternative specifications. Political Analysis15(3): 101–123.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
