Democracy requires an active and informed citizenry. Citizen engagement is all the more critical in complex environments such as the European Union (EU). This article examines how having an informed public matters for support for European-level policy competencies. Is public skepticism of EU authority shaped by a lack of knowledge, or are attitudes about policy jurisdiction in Europe’s multilevel system unbiased by information? Our analysis of collective opinion in 27 issue areas reveals that, in nearly every case, a paucity of knowledge about the EU reduces popular support for European policy control. Further analyses show that possessing knowledge of Europe’s institutions affects support for EU authority in areas involving cross-border political issues. In contrast, we find no consistent biasing effect on opinions about control over economic issues.
AlesinaAAngeloniISchuknechtL (2005) What does the European Union do?Public Choice123: 275–319.
2.
AlthausS (1998) Information effects in collective preferences. American Political Science Review92(3): 545–558.
3.
AlthausS (2003) Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People, New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AndersonP (2004) A flag for convenience? Discourse and motivations of the London-based Eurosceptic press. European Studies20: 151–170.
5.
AndersonPMcLeodA (2004) The great non-communicator? The mass communication deficit of the European Parliament and its press directorate. Journal of Common Market Studies42(5): 897–917.
6.
Anderson P and Weymouth A (1999) Insulting the Public? The British Press and the European Union. London: Longman.
7.
ArceneauxK (2006) The federal face of voting: Are elected officials held accountable for the functions relevant to their office?Political Psychology27(5): 731–754.
8.
BartelsL (1996) Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science40: 194–230.
9.
BlaisAGidengilEFournierPNevitteN (2009) Information, visibility, and elections: Why electoral outcomes differ when voters are better informed. European Journal of Political Research48(2): 256–280.
10.
Chabert J (2002) Toward a Constitution for European Citizens. Brussels: Secretariat of the European Convention CONV 359/02.
11.
ChristiansenT(2001) The Council of Ministers: The politics of institutionalized intergovernmentalism. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) European Union: Power and Policy-making, London: Routledge.
12.
Clark N (2010) Explaining low turnout in elections to the European Parliament: Voters’ perceptions of the European Parliament. Paper presented at the ‘Auditing Electoral Democracy in the European Union’ PIREDEU Final User Community Conference, Brussels, 18–19 November 2010.
13.
ConverseP(1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: ApterD (ed.) Ideology and Discontent, New York: Free Press.
14.
De VreeseC (2002) Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration, Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.
15.
De VreeseC (2007) A spiral of Euroscepticism: The media’s fault?Acta Politica42: 271–286.
16.
De VreeseCBanducciSSemetkoHBoomgaardenH (2006) The news coverage of the 2004 European Parliamentary election campaign in 25 countries. European Union Politics7(4): 477–504.
17.
De VriesCEdwardsETillmanE (2011a) Clarity of responsibility beyond the pocketbook: How political institutions condition EU issue voting. Comparative Political Studies44(3): 339–363.
18.
De VriesCVan der BrugWVan EgmondMVan der EijkC (2011b) Individual and contextual variation in EU issue voting: The role of political information. Electoral Studies30(1): 16–28.
19.
Delli CarpiniMKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Diez MedranoJ (2003) Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
DuchRStevensonR (2008) The Economic Vote, New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
DuchRPalmerHAndersonC (2000) Heterogeneity of perceptions of national economic conditions. American Journal of Political Science44: 635–652.
23.
Elff M (2009) Political knowledge in comparative perspective: The problem of cross-national equivalence of measurement. Paper presented at the MPSA Annual National Conference, Chicago, April.
24.
FollesdalAHixS (2006) Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies44(3): 533–562.
25.
GabelM (1998) Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics60(2): 333–354.
26.
GabelMScheveK (2006) Mixed messages: Party dissent and mass opinion on European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 37–59.
27.
GilensM (2001) Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review95(2): 379–396.
28.
GomezBWilsonJM (2008) Political sophistication and attributions of blame in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Publius38: 633–650.
29.
HoboltS (2007) Taking cues on Europe? Voter competence and party endorsements in referendums on European integration. European Journal of Political Research46: 151–182.
30.
Hobolt S and Wittrock J (2010) The second order election model revisited. Paper presented at the 68th Annual MPSA National Conference, Chicago, 22–25 April 2010.
31.
HoogheL (2003) Europe divided? Elites vs. public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics4(3): 281–304.
32.
HoogheLMarksG (2004) Does identity or economic rationality drive public opinion on European integration?PS: Political Science and Politics37(3): 415–420.
33.
Hooghe L, Bakker R, Brigevich A, De Vries C, Edwards E, Marks G, Rovny J and Steenbergen S (2008) Reliability and validity of measuring party positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
34.
InglehartR (1970) Cognitive mobilization and European identity. Comparative Politics3(1): 45–70.
35.
JacobsLShapiroR (2000) Politicians Don’t Pander, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
LewisJLinzerD (2005) Estimating regression models in which the dependent variable is based on estimates. Political Analysis13(4): 345–364.
37.
LupiaAMcCubbinsM (1998) The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Really Need To Know?, New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
McLarenL (2002) Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat?Journal of Politics64(12): 551–566.
39.
MahlerVTaylorBWozniakJ (2000) Economics and public support for the European Union: An analysis at the national, regional, and individual levels. Polity32(3): 429–453.
40.
MaierJRittbergerB (2008) Shifting Europe’s boundaries: Mass media, public opinion and the enlargement of the EU. European Union Politics9(2): 243–267.
41.
MalhotraNMargalitY (2010) Short-term communication effects or longstanding dispositions? The public’s response to the financial crisis of 2008. Journal of Politics72(3): 852–867.
42.
MeyerC (1999) Political legitimacy and the invisibility of politics: Exploring the European Union’s communication deficit. Journal of Common Market Studies37(4): 617–639.
43.
Norris P (2000) Blaming the messenger? Political communications and turnout in EU elections. In: Agné H et al. (eds) Citizen Participation in European Politics. Demokratiutredningens skrift No. 32. Stockholm: Pressens Bild / Statens Offentliga Utredningar, 99–116.
44.
PageBShapiroR (1992) The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Papacostas A (2005) Eurobarometer 62.0: Standard European Trend Questions and Sport, October–November 2004 [Computer file]. ICPSR04289-v2. Cologne, Germany: GESIS/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors].
46.
PowellGWhittenG (1993) A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of political context. American Journal of Political Science37(2): 391–414.
47.
RayL(2004) Don’t rock the boat: Expectations, fears, and opposition to EU-level policy-making. In: MarksGSteenbergenM (eds) European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 51–61.
48.
Sánchez-CuencaI (2000) The political basis of support for European integration. European Union Politics1(2): 147–171.
49.
ScharpfF (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
SchmitterP (2000) How to Democratize the European Union … And Why Bother?, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
51.
SiedentopL (2000) Democracy in Europe, London: Penguin Books.
52.
Van der EijkCFranklinM(2004) Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In: MarksGSteenbergenM (eds) European Integration and Potential Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WilliamsS(1991) Sovereignty and accountability. In: KeohaneRHoffmannS (eds) The New European Community, Boulder, CO: Westview.
54.
ZallerJ (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
