Although the determinants of territorial mobilization at the level of the European Union (EU) have been examined since the 1990s, the analysis of the interaction between regional and state interest representation has been rather neglected. This article focuses on a single policy area – environmental affairs – in order to evaluate the impact of policy-specific preference intensity (salience) on state–region relationships in Brussels. Using original survey data, I demonstrate that greater salience tends to increase cooperative interest representation and to decrease state-bypassing interest representation. This finding shows how important salience configurations are in the strategic interactions between state and non-state players in the EU arena.
BacheIFlindersM (2004) Multi-level governance: Conclusions and implications. In: BacheIFlindersM (eds) Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–206.
2.
BauerMW (2006) The German Länder and the European Constitutional Treaty — Heading for a differentiated theory of regional elite support for European integration. Regional & Federal Studies16(1): 21–42.
3.
BauerMWBörzelTA (2010) Regions and the EU. In: ZürnMEnderleinHWältiS (eds) Handbook on Multilevel Governance. Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 253–263.
4.
BlatterJKreutzerMRentlMThieleJ (2008) The foreign relations of European regions: Competences and strategies. West European Politics31(3): 464–490.
5.
BlatterJKreutzerMRentlMThieleJ (2009) Preconditions for foreign activities of European regions: Tracing causal configurations of economic, cultural and political strategies. Publius: The Journal of Federalis40(1): 171–199.
6.
BombergEPetersonJ (1998) European Union decision making: The role of sub-national authorities. Political Studies40(2): 219–235.
7.
BorghettoEFranchinoF (2010) The role of subnational authorities in the implementation of EU Directives. Journal of European Public Policy17(6): 759–780.
8.
BörzelT (2002) States and Regions in the European Union: Institutional Adaptation in Germany and Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BrownA (2001) EU Environmental Policies in Subnational Regions: The Case of Scotland and Bavaria. Aldershot: Ashgate.
10.
BulmerSBurchMCarterCHogwoodPScottA (2002) British Devolution and European Policy-Making: Transforming Britain into Multi-Level Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
CameronCMcCarthyN (2004) Models of vetoes and veto bargaining. Annual Review of Political Science7: 409–435.
12.
CohenJ (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin112(1): 155–159.
13.
Committee on Constitutional Affairs (2002) Report on the Division of Competences between the European Union and the Member States. Strasbourg: European Parliament.
14.
FairbrassJJordanA (2004) Multi-level governance and environmental policy. In: BacheIFlindersM (eds) Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–164.
FriedenJ (1999) Actors and preferences in international relations. In: LakeDPowellR (eds) Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 147–164.
17.
GreenwoodJ (2007) Interest Representation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
HixS (2005) The Political System of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
HoogheLMarksG (2003) Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review97(2): 233–243.
20.
HoogheLMarksGSchakelAH (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
21.
HuysseuneMJansT (2008) Bruxelles, capitale de l’Europe des régions? Les bureaux régionaux, acteurs politiques européens. Brussels Studies No. 16, 28 February.
22.
JefferyC (2007) A regional rescue of the nation-state: Changing regional perspectives on Europe. Europa Institute, Mitchell Working Paper Series 5/2007.
23.
JefferyCWincottD (2010) The challenge of territorial politics: Beyond methodological nationalism. In: HayC (ed.) New Directions in Political Science. Responding to the Challenges of an Interdependent World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 167–188.
24.
KeatingM (2008) A quarter century of the Europe of the regions. Regional & Federal Studies18(5): 629–635.
25.
KeatingMHoogheL (2006) Bypassing the nation-state? Regions and the EU policy process. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) European Union: Power and policy-making. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 269–286.
26.
LakeDPowellR (eds) (1999) Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
LongSJFreeseJ (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. Lakeway Drive, College Station: Stata Press.
28.
MagoneJ (2003) The third level of European integration: New and old insights. In: MagoneJ (ed.) Regional Institutions and Governance in the European Union. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, pp. 1–28.
29.
MandrinoC (2008) The Lisbon Treaty and the new powers of regions. European Journal of Law Reform10(4): 515–534.
30.
MaozZ (1983) Resolve, capabilities, and the outcome of interstate disputes, 1816–1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution27: 195–229.
31.
MarksGHaeslyRMbayeH (2002) What do subnational offices think they are doing in Brussels?. Regional and Federal Studies12(3): 1–23.
32.
MarksGNielsenFRayLSalkJ (1996) Competencies, cracks, and conflicts: Regional mobilization in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies29(2): 164–192.
33.
MbayeH (2009) So What’s New? Mapping a Longitudinal Regional Office Footprint in Brussels. Marina del Rey, CA: European Union Studies Association.
34.
MooreC (2008) A Europe of the regions vs. the regions in Europe: Reflections on regional engagement in Brussels. Regional & Federal Studies18(5): 517–535.
35.
NeshkovaMI (2010) The impact of subnational interests on supranational regulation. Journal of European Public Policy17(8): 1193–1211.
36.
NielsenFSalkJ (1998) Ecology of collective action and regional representation in the European Union. European Sociological Review14(3): 231–254.
37.
PitschelDBauerMW (2009) Subnational governance approaches on the rise – Reviewing a decade of Eastern European regionalization research. Regional & Federal Studies19(3): 327–347.
38.
SalkJENielsenFMarksG (2001) Patterns of Cooperation among Regional Offices in Brussels: Homophily, Complementarity, and National Embeddedness. Atlanta, GA: Southern Sociological Society.
39.
SnyderGDiesingP (1977) Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
SoldatosP (1990) An explanatory framework for the study of federated states as foreign-policy actors. In: MichaelmannHSoldatosP (eds) Federalism and International Relations. The Role of Subnational Units. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 34–53.
41.
TathamM (2010) With or without you? Revisiting territorial state-bypassing in EU interest representation. Journal of European Public Policy17(1): 76–99.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
