Contemporary European studies concur that public pressure and responsiveness have become key ingredients of the EU policy arena. Nonetheless, there is little known about when and how the elites in Brussels articulate public interests in EU policy debates. This article bridges this gap by examining the conditions under which political elites involved in EU legislative procedures address public interests in the news. It is expected that the politicization of EU policy processes stimulates elites to articulate public interests. The dataset consists of 2164 media statements in six European media outlets on a sample of 125 legislative proposals (2008–2010). The results demonstrate that elites address public interests in the media predominantly when issues are publicly salient and attract intensive mobilization by civil society groups. Elites stay silent about public interests when policy processes are crowded with business lobbyists and are of low salience to European citizens.
AlexandrovaPRasmussenAToshkovD (2015) Agenda responsiveness in the European Council: Public priorities, policy problems and political attention. West European Politics39(4): 605–627.
2.
ArmingeonKCekaB (2013) The loss of trust in the European Union during the great recession since 2007: The role of heuristics from the national political system. European Union Politics15(1): 82–107.
3.
BaumgartnerFRMahoneyC (2008) The two faces of framing: Individual-level framing and collective issue definition in the European Union. European Union Politics9(3): 435–449.
4.
BeyersJDe BruyckerIBallerI (2015) The alignment of parties and interest groups in EU legislative politics.. A tale of two different worlds?Journal of European Public Policy22(4): 534–551.
5.
BeyersJDürAMarshallDet al. (2014) Policy-centred sampling in interest group research: Lessons from the INTEREURO project. Interest Groups & Advocacy3(2): 160–173.
6.
BinderkrantzAS (2012) Interest groups in the media: Bias and diversity over time. European Journal of Political Research51(1): 117–139.
7.
BølstadJ (2015) Dynamics of European integration: Public opinion in the core and periphery. European Union Politics16(1): 23–44.
8.
BörzelTARisseT (2009) Revisiting the nature of the beast–politicization, European identity, and postfunctionalism: A comment on Hooghe and Marks. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 217–220.
9.
BursteinP (2014) American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress: What the Public Wants and What it Gets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CulpepperPD (2010) Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DaviterF (2011) Policy Framing in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
De BruyckerIBeyersJ (2015) Balanced or biased? Interest groups and legislative lobbying in the European news media. Political Communication32(3): 453–474.
13.
De BruyckerI (2016a) Pressure and expertise: Explaining information supply in EU legislative lobbying. Journal of Common Market Studies54(3): 599–616.
14.
De BruyckerI (2016b) Power and position: Which EU party groups do lobbyists prioritize and why?Party Politics22(4): 552–562.
15.
De WildePLeupoldASchmidtkeH (2016) Introduction: The differentiated politicisation of European governance. West European Politics39(1): 3–22.
16.
De WildePLordC (2016) Assessing actually-existing trajectories of EU politicisation. West European Politics39(1): 145–163.
17.
DürAMateoG (2013) Gaining access or going public? Interest group strategies in five European countries. European Journal of Political Research52(5): 660–686.
18.
FollesdalAHixS (2006) Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies44(3): 533–562.
19.
GaltungJRugeM (1965) The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research2(1): 64–90.
20.
GolanG (2006) Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage. Journalism7(2): 323–333.
21.
HarcupTO’NeillD (2001) What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies2(2): 261–280.
22.
HigleyJ (2010) Elite theory and elites. In: LeichtKJenkinsC (eds) Handbook of Politics, New York: Springer, pp. 161–176.
23.
HoboltSBKlemmensenR (2008) Government responsiveness and political competition in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies41(3): 309–337.
24.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
25.
HopmannDNVan AelstPLegnanteG (2012) Political balance in the news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 240–257.
26.
HutterSGrandeE (2014) Politicizing Europe in the national electoral arena: A comparative analysis of five West European countries, 1970–2010. Journal of Common Market Studies52(5): 1002–1018.
27.
KatzELazarsfeldPF (1966) Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
28.
KoopmansRErbeJ (2004) Towards a European public sphere? Vertical and horizontal dimensions of Europeanized political communication. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research17(2): 97–118.
29.
KoopmansRStathamP (1999) Political claims analysis: Integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization: An International Quarterly4(2): 203–221.
30.
KriesiHTreschAJochumM (2007) Going public in the European Union: Action repertoires of Western European collective political actors. Comparative Political Studies40(1): 48–73.
31.
MahoneyC (2008) Brussels Versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union, Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
32.
PageBIShapiroRY (1983) Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review77(1): 175–190.
33.
Rasmussen, A, Mäder L and Reher S (2017) With a little help from the people? The role of public opinion in advocacy success. Comparative Political Studies. Epub ahead of Print 22 March 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0010414017695334.
34.
RooduijnMPauwelsT (2011) Measuring populism: Comparing two methods of content analysis. West European Politics34(6): 1272–1283.
35.
SchattschneiderEE (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
36.
SteenbergenMREdwardsEEDe VriesCE (2007) Who’s cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 13–35.
37.
ThomsonR (2011) Resolving Controversy in the European Union: Legislative Decision-Making Before and After Enlargement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
ToshkovD (2011) Public opinion and policy output in the European Union: A lost relationship. European Union Politics12(2): 169–191.
39.
TrenzH-J (2004) Media coverage on European governance: Exploring the European public sphere in national quality newspapers. European Journal of Communication19(3): 291–319.
40.
Van AelstPMaddensBNoppeJet al. (2008) Politicians in the news: Media or party logic? Media attention and electoral success in the Belgian election campaign of 2003. European Journal of Communication23(2): 193–210.
41.
Van AelstPWalgraveS (2016) Information and arena: The dual function of the news media for political elites. Journal of Communication66(3): 496–518.
42.
Van DalenA (2012) Structural bias in cross-national perspective: How political systems and journalism cultures influence government dominance in the news. The International Journal of Press/Politics17(1): 32–55.
43.
Van Egmond M, van der Brug W, Hobolt S, et al. (2011) European parliament election study 2009, voter study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5055 Data file Version 1.
44.
WlezienC (2004) Patterns of representation: Dynamics of public preferences and policy. Journal of Politics66(1): 1–24.
45.
WlezienC (2005) On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem’. Electoral Studies24: 555–579.
46.
Wonka A, De Bruycker I, De Bièvre D, et al. (2015) The structure of conflict in EU interest group politics: Positions, actor alignments and divisiveness. In: 14th EUSA conference, Boston, USA.
47.
ZallerJ (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
ZürnM (2006) Zur Politisierung der Europäischen Union. Politische Vierteljahresschrift47(2): 242–251.
49.
ZürnM (2016) Opening up Europe: Next steps in politicisation research. West European Politics39(1): 164–182.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
