This article builds on previous findings that border residents are less prone to be Eurosceptic. First, it enhances measurement by using a more exact distinction between border and core districts. Second, it extends theory by arguing that the lower propensity towards Euroscepticism among border residents is the result of their greater involvement in transnational networks and interactions. Third, the article adds to the interest-or-identity discussion in Euroscepticism research by distinguishing between goal-oriented and sociable forms of transnational interactions and testing their impact on Euroscepticism. Multilevel analyses of Eurobarometer data for France and Germany show that (1) the border effect holds only in Germany, (2) it is mediated by individual transnationalism, and (3) sociable forms of interaction are key to structuring attitudes towards European integration.
AdlerEBarnettM (1998) Security communities in theoretical perspective. In: AdlerEBarnettM (eds) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–65.
2.
AllportGW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. New York, NY: Doubleday & Company.
3.
AndersonCJ (1998) When in doubt, use proxies: Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies31(5): 569–601.
4.
AndersonCJReichertS (1995) Economic benefits and support for membership in the EU: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Public Policy15(3): 231–249.
5.
BalibarÉ (2001) Nous, citoyens d'Europe? Les frontières, l’État, le peuple. Paris: La Découverte.
6.
BaronRKennyD (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
7.
BartoliniS (2004) Old and new peripheries in the processes of European territorial integration. In: AnsellCDi PalmaG (eds) Restructuring Territoriality. Europe and the United States Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–44.
8.
BartoliniS (2005) Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring between Nation State and the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BrinegarAPJollySKKitscheltH (2004) Varieties of capitalism and political divides over European integration. In: MarksGSteenbergenMR (eds) European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–89.
11.
BurnhamKPAndersonDR (2004) Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer.
12.
CaireG (2008) Un portrait socio-statistique des ‘champions du monde’ des vacances. Laboratoire de recherche sur l'industrie et l'innovation, DT/55/2008.
13.
CareyS (2002) Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration?European Union Politics3(4): 387–413.
14.
CautrèsB (2005) Les clivages socio-politiques sur l'intégration européenne et le vote du 29 mai 2005. Cahiers du CEVIPOF42: 142–155.
15.
De VreeseCHBoomgaardenHG (2005) Projecting EU referendums: Fear of immigration and support for European integration. European Union Politics6(1): 59–82.
16.
De VriesCEEdwardsE (2009) Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public euroscepticism. Party Politics15(1): 5–28.
17.
DelheyJ (2005) Das Abenteuer der Europäisierung. Überlegungen zu einem soziologischen Begriff europäischer Integration und zur Stellung der Soziologie zu den Integration Studies. Soziologie34(1): 7–27.
18.
DeutschKW (1954) Political Community at the International Level. Problems of Definition and Measurement. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
19.
DeutschKWBurrellSAKannRAMauriceLJLichtermanMLindgrenRE (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. New York: Greenwood Press.
20.
DeutschKWEdingerLJMacridisRCMerrittRL (1967) France, Germany and the Western Alliance. New York: Scribner.
21.
Díez MedranoJ (2003) Framing Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
DürrschmidtJ (2006) So near yet so far: Blocked networks, global links and multiple exclusion in the German–Polish borderlands. Global Networks6(3): 245–263.
23.
EichenbergRCDaltonRJ (1993) Europeans and the European Union: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization47(4): 507–534.
24.
EichenbergRCDaltonRJ (2007) Post-Maastricht blues: The transformation of citizen support for European integration, 1973–2004. Acta Politica42(2–3): 128–152.
25.
European Commission (2006) Eurobarometer 65.1. The Future of Europe, Consumer Protection in Transborder Purchases, Family Planning, and Opinions and Experiences in Transborder Purchases. February–March 2006. TNS OPINION & SOCIAL, Brussels [Producer]; GESIS, Cologne [Publisher]: ZA4505.
26.
FligsteinN (2008) Euroclash. The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
GabelM (1998) Interests and Integration. Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28.
GabelMPalmerH (1995) Understanding variation in public support for European integration. European Journal of Political Research27(1): 3–19.
29.
GustafsonP (2009) More cosmopolitan, no less local – the orientations of international travellers. European Societies11(1): 25–47.
30.
HausL (2009) Europeanization, education, and school curricula: The role of historical legacies in explaining policy variation between England and France. Comparative Political Studies42(7): 916–944.
31.
HoogheLMarksG (2004) Does identity or economic rationality drive public opinion on European integration?PS-Political Science & Politics37(3): 415–420.
32.
InglehartR (1970) Cognitive mobilization and European identity. Comparative Politics3(1): 45–70.
33.
INSEE [National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies] (2005) Statistiques locales – Produit Intérieur Brut par habitant par département. URL (accessed 29 December 2009): http://www.statistiques-locales.insee.fr.
KarpJABanducciSABowlerS (2003) To know it is to love it? Satisfaction with democracy in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies36(3): 271–292.
37.
KeatingM (2008) A quarter century of the Europe of the Regions. Regional and Federal Studies18(5): 629–635.
38.
KohliM (2000) The battlegrounds of European identity. European Societies2(2): 113–137.
39.
KuhnT (2011) Individual transnationalism, globalisation and euroscepticism: An empirical test of Deutsch's transactionalist theory. European Journal of Political Research50(6): 811–837.
LubbersMScheepersP (2007) Explanations of political euro-scepticism at the individual, regional and national levels. European Societies9(4): 643–669.
42.
LuedtkeA (2005) European integration, public opinion and immigration policy: Testing the impact of national identity. European Union Politics6(1): 83–112.
43.
MacKinnonDFairchildAFritzM (2007) Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology58: 593–614.
44.
McLarenL (2006) Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
MauSMewesJZimmermannA (2008) Cosmopolitan attitudes through transnational social practices?Global Networks8(1): 1–24.
48.
PreacherKHayesA (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behaviour research methods40(3): 879–891.
49.
RipplSBückerNPetratA (2010) Crossing the frontier: Transnational social integration in the EU's border regions. International Journal of Comparative Sociology51(1–2): 5–31.
50.
RokkanS (2000) Staat, Nation und Demokratie in Europa. Die Theorie Stein Rokkans aus seinen gesammelten Werken rekonstruiert und eingeleitet von Peter Flora. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.
51.
RohrschneiderR (2002) The democratic deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science46(2): 463–475.
52.
RooseJ (2010) Vergesellschaftung an Europas Binnengrenzen. Eine vergleichende Studie zu den Bedingungen sozialer Integration. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
53.
RotherNNebeTM (2009) More mobile, more European? Free movement and EU identity. In: RecchiEFavellA (eds) Pioneers of European Integration. Citizenship and Mobility in the EU. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishers, 120–155.
SchmidbergerM (1997) Regionen und europäische Legitimität. Der Einfluss des regionalen Umfeldes auf Bevölkerungseinstellungen zur EU. Frankfurt a.M: Peter Lang.
56.
SemyonovMRaijmanRGorodzeiskyA (2006) The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review71(3): 426–449.
57.
SigalasE (2010) Cross-border mobility and European identity: The effectiveness of intergroup contact during the ERASMUS year abroad. European Union Politics11(2): 241–265.
58.
SobelME (1986) Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In: TumaN (ed.) Sociological MethodologyWashington, DC: American Sociological Association.
TaylorP (1994) The state as container. Territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography18(2): 151–162.
63.
TuckerJAPacekACBerinskyAJ (2002) Transitional winners and losers: Attitudes toward EU membership in post-communist countries. American Journal of Political Science46(3): 557–571.
64.
VobrubaG (1994) The limits of borders. In: de SwaanA (ed.) Social Policy beyond Borders: The Social Question in Transnational Perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 7–13.
65.
Wastl-WalterDVáradiMMVeiderF (2003) Coping with marginality: To stay or to go. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies29(5): 797–817.
66.
WesselsB (1995) Evaluations of the EC: Elite or mass driven. In: NiedermayerOSinnottR (eds) Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 105–136.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
