Recent processes of decentralization have dramatically changed local political configurations and access to resources throughout Indonesia. In particular, the resource-rich regions at the margins of the state have, in the name of regional autonomy, experienced new spaces for manoeuvre in their claims for a larger share of forest resources. By stressing the unfolding relationship between local ethnic elites and the state, and their different strategies in negotiating and claiming authority over forests within Indonesia's changing forest regimes, the paper examines how local-level politics has taken on its special configuration in the remote border region of West Kalimantan, Indonesia. The author demonstrates this by focusing on the ongoing struggle over forest resources and by tracking the fate of a political movement for a new district in this resource-rich region. The paper further examines how current local elite strategies and networks can be related back to the period of border militarization in the 1960s and, once again, how these seem to challenge the exclusivity of the Indonesian–Malaysian border. The main argument is that central authority in the borderland has never been absolute, but waxes and wanes, and thus that state rules and laws are always up for local interpretation and negotiation, although the degree of such negotiation changes depending on the strength of the central state.
AbrahamI.van SchendelW. (2005), ‘Introduction: The making of illicitness’, in van SchendelW.AbrahamI., eds, Illicit Flows and Criminal Things: States, Borders, and the Other Side of Globalization, Tracking Globalization, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, pp 1–37.
2.
Bappenas (2004), Kawasan Perbatasan: Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengelolaan Kawasan Perbatasan Antarnegara di Indonesia, Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, Jakarta.
3.
DavidsonJ.KammenD. (2002), ‘Indonesia's unknown war and the lineages of violence in West Kalimantan’, Indonesia, Vol 73, April, pp 1–36.
4.
Dephut (2005), ‘Tiga Warga Negara Malaysia Tersangka Pelaku Illegal Logging Segara Disidangkan’, Departmen Kehutanan Republik Indonesia, No S. 210/II/PIK-1/2005, Jakarta.
5.
DermawanA. (2004), ‘Has the big bang hit the trees and people? The impacts of Indonesia's decentralization on forest conservation and the livelihood of communities’, MSc thesis, Department of Economics and Resource Management, Agricultural University of Norway, Aas.
6.
DuncanC. R. (2007), ‘Mixed outcomes: The impact of regional autonomy and decentralization on indigenous ethnic minorities in Indonesia’, Development and Change, Vol 38, No 4, pp 11–33.
7.
FitraniF.HofmanB.KaiserK. (2005), ‘Unity in diversity? The creation of new local governments in a decentralising Indonesia’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol 41, No 1, p 57–79.
8.
FoxJ.AdhuriD. S.ResosudarmoI. A. P. (2005), ‘Unfinished edifice or Pandora's box? Decentralisation and resource management in Indonesia’, in ResosudarmoB. P., ed, The Politics and Economics of Indonesia's Natural Resources, ISEAS Publications, Singapore, pp 92–108.
9.
HarwellE. (2000), ‘The un-natural history of culture: Ethnicity, tradition and territorial conflict in West Kalimantan, Indonesia, 1800–1997’, PhD dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
10.
HenleyD.DavidsonJ. (2008), ‘In the name of adat: Regional perspectives on reform, tradition, and democracy in Indonesia’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol 42, No 4, pp 815–852.
11.
Inpres (2005), Pemberantasan Penebangan Kayu Secara Illegal di Kawasan Hutan dan Peredarannya di Seluruh Wilayah Republik Indonesia, Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia, No 4, Jakarta.
12.
Kalimantan Review (2005), ‘Kemerdekaan warge perbatasan’, Kalimantan Review (Indonesian edition) Vol 121, No XIV (September), pp 9–12.
13.
HuluKapuas (2006), Data Pokok Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu, Kantor Penelitian, Pengembangan dan Informatika, Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu, Putussibau.
14.
KaterC. (1883), ‘Iets over de Batang Loepar Dajakhs in de “Westerafdeeling van Borneo”’, De Indische Gids, Vol 5, pp 1–14.
15.
KingV. (1976), ‘Some aspects of Iban–Maloh contact in West Kalimantan’, Indonesia, Vol 21, pp 85–114.
16.
KNPDT (2007), Rencana Aksi Nasional Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal Tahun 2007–2009, Kementerian Negara Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, Jakarta.
17.
LumentaD. (2005), ‘Borderland identity construction within a market place of narrative. Preliminary notes on the Batang Kanyau Iban in West Kalimantan’, Masyarakat Indonesia–Majalah Ilmu–Ilmu Social Indonesia, Vol XXX, No 2, pp 1–26.
18.
MackieJ. A. C. (1974), Konfrontasi: The Indonesia-Malaysia Dispute. 1963–1966, Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur.
19.
McCarthyJ. (2004), ‘Changing to gray: Decentralization and the emergence of volatile socio-legal configurations in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia’, World Development, Vol 32, No 7, pp 1199–1223.
20.
McCarthyJ. (2007), ‘Sold down river: Renegotiating public power over nature in Central Kalimantan’, in NorholdtH. Schultevan KlinkenG., eds, Renegotiating Boundaries: Local Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia, KITLV Press, Leiden, pp 151–176.
21.
McKeownF. (1984), ‘The Merakai Iban: An ethnographic account with special reference to dispute settlement’, PhD dissertation, Monash University, Melbourne.
22.
MorishitaA. (2008), ‘Contesting power in Indonesia's resource-rich regions in the era of decentralization: New strategy for central control over the regions’, Indonesia, Vol 86, October, pp 81–107.
23.
ObidzinskiK.AndriantoA.WijayaC. (2007), ‘Cross-border timber trade in Indonesia: Critical or overstated problem? Forest governance lessons from Kalimantan’, International Forestry Review, Vol 9, No 1, pp 526–535.
24.
Perdu (1999), Pengusahaan Hutan dan Pemungutan Hutan pada Hutan Produksi, Peraturan Pemerintah, No 6, Jakarta.
25.
Perdu (2002), Tata Hutan dan Penyusunan Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan, Pemanfaatan Hutan dan Pengunaan Kawasan Hutan, Peraturan Pemerintah, No 32, Jakarta.
26.
PPKPU (2007), Gambaran Umum Kelayakan Pemekaran Pembentukan Kabupaten Perbatasan Utara di Kapuas Hulu, Kalimantan Barat, Panitia Pembentukan Kabupaten Perbatasan Utara, Pontianak/Jakarta.
27.
RachmadiRaden (2006), ‘Department Dalam Negeri Susun RUU Perbatasan’, Tempo, 20 January.
28.
RachmanA.MansjurA.SalijoL., and Staff Semdam XII Tanjungpura (1970), Tanjungpura Berdjuang – Sejarah Kodam XII/Tanjungpura, Kalimantan Barat, Kodam Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat.
29.
RothD. (2007), ‘Many governors, no province: The struggle for a province in the Luwu-Tana Toraja area in South Sulawesi’, in NordholtH. Schultevan KlinkenG., eds, Renegotiating Boundaries: Local Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia, KITLV Press, Leiden, pp 121–147.
30.
NordholtH. Schultevan KlinkenG. (2007), ‘Introduction’, in NordholtH. Schultevan KlinkenG., eds, Renegotiating Boundaries: Local Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia, KITLV Press, Leiden, pp 1–29.
31.
ScottJ. C. (1998), Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
32.
HuluSkep Kapuas (2001), Prosedur tetap permohonan ijin hak pemungutan hasil hutan dengan luas maksimal 100 Ha. Putussibau, Surat Keputusan Bupati Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu, No 8, Putussibau.
33.
Soemadi (1974), Peranan Kalimantan Barat dalam Menghadapi Subversi Komunis Asia Tenggara: Suatu Tinjauan Internasional Terhadap Gerakan Komunis Dari Sudut Pertahanan Wilayah Khususnya Kalimantan Barat, Yayasan Tanjungpura, Pontianak.
34.
StockwellA. J. (2004), ‘Britain and Brunei, 1945–1963: Imperial retreat and royal ascendancy’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol 38, No 4, pp 785–819.
35.
SulistyoriniPembayun (2004), ‘Pemberontakan PGRS/PARAKU di Kalimantan Barat’, Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya Kalimantan, Vol 3, p 79.
36.
TanasaldyT. (2007), ‘Ethnic identity politics in West Kalimantan’, in NordholtH. Schultevan KlinkenG., eds, Renegotiating Boundaries: Local Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia, KITLV Press, Leiden, pp 349–371.
37.
WadleyR. (1998), ‘The road to change in the Kapuas Hulu borderlands: Jalan Lintas Utara’, Borneo Research Bulletin, Vol 29, pp 71–94.
38.
WadleyR. (2005), ‘Boundaries, territories and resource access in West Kalimantan, Indonesia’, in WadleyR., ed, Histories of the Borneo Environment: Economic, Political, and Social Dimensions of Change and Continuity, KITLV Press, Leiden, pp 137–157.
39.
WadleyR.EilenbergM. (2005), ‘Autonomy, identity, and “illegal” logging in the borderland of West Kalimantan, Indonesia’, Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, Vol 6, No 1, pp 19–34.
40.
WadleyR.EilenbergM. (2006), ‘Vigilantes and gangsters in the borderland of West Kalimantan, Indonesia’, in HorstmannA., ed, State, People and Borders in Southeast Asia, A Special Issue of The Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, Vol 7.
41.
WadleyR.KuyahF. (2001), ‘Iban communities in West Kalimantan’, in SutliveV.SutliveJ., eds, The Encyclopaedia of Iban Studies. Vol 2, Tun Jugah Foundation, Kuching.
42.
WilsonT.DonnanH. (1998), Border Identities: Nation and State at International Frontiers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43.
WollenbergE.MoelionoM.LimbergG.IvanR.RheeS.SudanaM. (2006), ‘Between state and society: Local governance of forest in Malinau, Indonesia’, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol 8, No 4, pp 421–433.
44.
YasmiY.AnshariG.KomarudinH.AlqadriS. (2006), ‘Stakeholder conflicts and forest decentralization policies in West Kalimantan: Their dynamics and implications for future forest management’, Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, Vol 16, pp 167–180.
