The legislative organization of the European Parliament (EP) has far-reaching implications for its ability to solve the democratic deficit problem of the European Union (EU). Recognizing that, this article reviews the literature on the EP organization with a view to consolidating existing knowledge and identifying outstanding research gaps. It calls for a new generation of research to go beyond the congressional theoretical literature and develop theoretical accounts of the EP's internal organizational adaptation in response to its rising legislative powers and the development of true EU bicameralism. Generalizing such accounts can add to broader theories of legislative organization, which have hitherto failed to explicitly incorporate the effect of external (institutional) developments in their predictions.
BenedettoG (2005) Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs: The dynamics of codecision procedure in Europe's parliament. Journal of European Public Policy12(1): 67–88.
2.
BowlerSFarrellDM (1995) The organizing of the European Parliament: Committees,specialization and co-ordination. British Journal of Political Science25(2): 219–243.
3.
CorbettRJacobsFShackletonM (2003) The European Parliament at fifty: A view from the inside. Journal of Common Market Studies41(2): 353–373.
4.
CorbettRJacobsFShackletonM (2007) The European Parliament, 7th. London: John Harper.
5.
CostelloRThomsonR (2010) The policy impact of leadership in committees: Rapporteurs’ influence on the European Parliament's opinions. European Union Politics11(2): 219–240.
6.
CoxGWMcCubbinsMD (1993) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
CoxGWMcCubbinsMD (2007) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. 2nd. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
DiermeierDMyersonRB (1999) Bicameralism and its consequences for the internal organization of legislatures. American Economic Review89(5): 1182–1196.
FarrellHHéritierA (2004) Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision making: Early agreements under codecision and their impact on the European Parliament and Council. Comparative Political Studies37(10): 1184–1212.
12.
FarrellDMScullyR (2002) MEPs as representatives: Individual and institutional roles. Journal of Common Market Studies41(2): 269–288.
13.
HägeFMKaedingM (2007) Reconsidering the European Parliament's legislative influence: Formal vs. informal procedures. Journal of European Integration29(3): 341–361.
14.
HagemannSHøylandB (2010) Bicameral politics in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies48(4): 811–833.
15.
HausemerP (2006) Participation and political competition in committee report allocation: Under what conditions do MEPs represent their constituents?. European Union Politics7(4): 505–530.
16.
HéritierA (2007) Explaining Institutional Change in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
HixS (2004) Electoral institutions and legislative behaviour: Explaining voting defection in the European Parliament. World Politics56194–223.
18.
HixSNouryA (2009) After Enlargement: Voting patterns in the sixth European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly34(2): 159–174.
19.
HixSNouryARolandG (2006) Dimensions of politics in the European Parliament. American Journal of Political Science50(2): 494–511.
20.
HixSNouryARolandG (2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HixSRaunioTScullyR (2003) Fifty years on: Research on the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies41(2): 191–202.
22.
Hooghe L, Bakker R, Brigevich A, De Vries C, Edwards E, Marks G, Rovny J and Steenbergen M (2008) Reliability and validity of measuring party positions: the Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006. Mimeo.
23.
HøylandB (2006) Allocation of codecision reports in the fifth European Parliament. European Union Politics7(1): 30–50.
24.
HøylandBSircarIHixS (2009) Forum section: An automated database of the European Parliament. European Union Politics10(1): 143–152.
25.
JudgeDEarnshawD (2003) The European Parliament. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
JudgeDEarnshawD (2008) The European Parliament, 2nd. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
KaedingM (2004) Rapporteurship allocation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics5(3): 353–371.
28.
KaedingM (2005) The world of committee reports: Rapporteurship assignment in the European Parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies11(1): 82–104.
29.
KardashevaR (2009) The power of delay: The European Parliament's influence in the consultation procedure. Journal of Common Market Studies47(2): 385–409.
30.
KrehbielK (1991) Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31.
KreppelA (2002a) The European Parliament and Supranational Party System: A Study of Institutional Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
KreppelA (2002b) Moving beyond procedure: An empirical analysis of European Parliament legislative influence. Comparative Political Studies35(7): 784–813.
33.
KreppelA (2003) Necessary but not sufficient: Understanding the impact of treaty reform on the internal development of the European Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy10(6): 844–911.
34.
LindbergB (2008) Are political parties controlling legislative decision-making in the European Parliament? The case of the services directive. Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1184–1204.
35.
McElroy G (2001) Committees and party cohesion in the European Parliament. EPRG working paper No. 8.
36.
McElroyG (2006) Committee representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics7(1): 5–29.
37.
McElroyG (2007) Legislative politics. RosamondBJJorgensenKEPollackMHandbook of European Union Politics. London: Sage, 175–194.
38.
McElroyGBenoitK (2007) Party groups and policy positions in the European Parliament. Party Politics13(1): 5–28.
39.
MaltzmanF (1997) Competing Principals: Committees, Parties and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
MamadouhVRaunioT (2003) The committee system: Powers, appointment and report allocation. Journal of Common Market Studies41(2): 333–351.
41.
MarksGSteenbergenM (2004) European Integration and Political Conflict: Citizens, Parties, Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MayhewD (1974) The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
MoravcsikA (1998) In defence of the ‘democratic deficit’: Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies40(4): 603–624.
44.
Neuhold C (2001) The ‘legislative backbone’ of keeping the institution upright? The role of European Parliament committees in the EU policy-making process. European Integration online Papers, vol. 5, no. 10. URL (accessed 6 July 2011): http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-010a.htm.
45.
NouryA (2002) Ideology, nationality, and Euro-parliamentarians. European Union Politics3(1): 33–58.
46.
PolsbyNW (1968) The institutionalization of the U.S. house of representatives. American Political Science Review62(1): 144–168.
47.
RingeN (2010) Who Decides, and How? Preferences, Uncertainty, and Policy Choice in the European Parliament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
RittbergerB (2005) Building Europe's Parliament. Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
ScarrowSE (1997) Political career paths and the European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly22(2): 253–262.
50.
SchmittHThomassenJ (2009) The European party system after Enlargement. ThomassenJThe Legitimacy of the European Union after Enlargement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–43.
51.
SettembriPNeuholdC (2009) Achieving consensus through committees: Does the European Parliament manage?. Journal of Common Market Studies47(1): 127–151.
52.
ShepsleKWeingastB (1987) The institutional foundation of committee power. American Political Science Review81(1): 85–104.
53.
ShepsleKWeingastB (1995) Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
54.
ThomassenJNouryAVoetenE (2004) Political competition in the European Parliament: Evidence from roll call and survey analyses. MarksGSteunbergenMEuropean Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–161.
55.
VoetenE (2009) Enlargement and the ‘normal’ European Parliament. ThomassenJThe Legitimacy of the European Union after Enlargement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93–113.
56.
WestlakeM (1994) A Modern Guide to the European ParliamentLondon and New York: Pinter Publishers.
57.
WhitakerR (2001) Party control in a committee-based legislature? The case of the European Parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies7(4): 63–88.
58.
WhitakerR (2005) National parties in the European Parliament. European Union Politics6(1): 5–28.
59.
YordanovaN (2009) Rationale behind committee assignments in the European Parliament: Distributive, informational and partisan perspectives. European Union Politics10(2): 263–290.
60.
YordanovaN (2010) Legislative organisation of the European Parliament: The role of committees. Florence: Unpublished doctoral thesis, European University Institute.
61.
YordanovaN (2011) The effect of inter-institutional rules on the division of power in the European Parliament: Allocation of consultation versus codecision reports. West European Politics34(1): 1501–1525.
62.
YoshinakaAMcElroyGBowlerS (2010) The appointment of rapporteurs in the European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly35(4): 457–486.
