Most current debate about the democratic deficit equates democracy with party government and popular direction of policy (popular sovereignty). Alternative conceptions of democracy, pluralist or veto-group liberalism, are more consistent with European political and social circumstances and with EU institutions. After developing the difference between popular sovereignty and liberal models of democracy, the paper uses data from a survey of members of the European Parliament and members of the national parliaments in the EU to show that MP orientations with respect to these democratic values contribute significantly to explaining their evaluations of the quality of EU democracy and their preferences for EU institutional development.
Andersen, Cecilia
(1996) `European Union Policy-making and National Institutions - the Case of Belgium', in Svein A. Andersen and Kjell A. Eliassen (eds) The European Union: How Democratic Is It?, pp. 83-100. London: Sage.
2.
Barber, Benjamin
(1984) Strong Democracy.Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Bentham, Jeremy
(1962) Constitutional Code in The Works of Jeremy Bentham.New York: Russell & Russell, vol 9.
4.
Berman, Sheri
and Kathleen McNamara (1999) `Bank on Democracy: Why Central Banks Need Public Oversight', Foreign Affairs78(2): 2-8.
5.
Bindi, Federiga Maria
(1996) `Italy: in Need of More EU Democracy', in Svein A. Andersen and Kjell A. Eliassen (eds) The European Union: How Democratic Is It?, pp. 101-115. London: Sage.
6.
Bradley, Kieran
and Alastair Sutton (1994) `European Union and the Rule of Law', in Andrew Duff, John Pinder and Roy Pryce (eds) Maastricht and Beyond.London: Routledge.
7.
Buchanan, James M.
and Gordon Tullock (1962) The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
Calhoun, John C.
(1943) Disquisition on Government.New York: Peter Smith.
9.
Caporaso, James A.
(1996) `The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern?', Journal of Common Market Studies34: 29-52.
10.
Coultrap, John
(1999) `From Parliamentarism to Pluralism: Models of Democracy and the European Union's “Democratic Deficit” ', Journal of Theoretical Politics11: 107-135.
11.
Dahl, Robert A.
(1971) Polyarchy.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Dahl, Robert A.
(1989) Democracy and Its Critics.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Dehousse, Renaud
(1995) `Constitutional Reform in the European Community. Are There Alternatives to the Majority Avenue?'West European Politics18(3): 118-136.
14.
Duverger, Maurice
(1959) Political Parties.New York: John Wiley.
15.
Federalist 10(n.d.) New York: Random House.
16.
Gabel, Matthew J.
(1998) `The Endurance of Supranational Governance: A Consociational Interpretation of the European Union', Comparative Politics30: 463-475.
17.
Hix, Simon
(1998) `The Study of the European Union II: The “New Governance” Agenda and Its Rival', Journal of European Public Policy5: 38-65.
18.
Katz, Richard S.
(1986) `Party Government: A Rationalistic Conception', in Francis G. Castles and Rudolf Wildenmann (eds) Visions and Realities of Party Government.Berlin: de Gruyter.
19.
Katz, Richard S.
(1994) `The Problem of Legitimacy in the European Community/European Union', paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops, Madrid.
20.
Katz, Richard S.
(1997) Democracy and Elections.New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Katz, Richard S.
(1999) `Role Orientations in Parliaments', in Richard S. Katz and Bernhard Wessels (eds) The European Parliament, the National Parliaments, and European Integration, pp. 21-44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Katz, Richard S.
and Bernhard Wessels (eds) (1999) The European Parliament, the National Parliaments, and European Integration.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
Lehner, Franz
and Benno Homann (1987) `Consociational Decision-Making and Party Government in Switzerland', in Richard S. Katz (ed.) Party Governments: European and American Experiences, pp. 243-269. Berlin: de Gruyter.
24.
Lequesne, Christian
(1996) `The French EU Decision-making: Between Destabilisation and Adaptation', in Svein A. Andersen and Kjell A. Eliassen (eds) The European Union: How Democratic Is It?, pp. 73-82. London: Sage.
25.
Lijphart, Arend
(1968) The Politics of Accommodation.Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Lipset, Seymour Martin
(1960) Political Man.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
27.
Lodge, Juliet
(1991) `The Democratic Deficit and the European Parliament', Fabian Society Discussion Paper No. 4. London: Fabian Society.
28.
Majone, Giandomenico
(1992) `Regulatory Federalism in the European Community', Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy10: 299-316.
29.
Majone, Giandomenico
(1993) `The European Community between Social Policy and Social Regulation', Journal of Common Market Studies31: 153-170.
30.
Majone, Giandomenico
(1994a) `The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe', West European Politics17: 77-101.
31.
Majone, Giandomenico
(1994b) `The European Community: An “Independent Fourth Branch of Government?” ', in G. Bruggemeier (ed.) Verfassungen für ein ziviles Europa, pp. 23-43. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
32.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33.
Norton, Philip
(ed.) (1996) National Parliaments and the European Union.Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
34.
Obradovic, Daniela
(1996) `Policy Legitimacy and the European Union', Journal of Common Market Studies34: 191-222.
35.
Ranney, Austin
(1962) The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
36.
Reif, Karlheinz
and Hermann Schmitt (1980) `Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results', European Journal of Political Research8: 3-44.
37.
Rose, Richard
(1974) The Problem of Party Government.London: Macmillan.
38.
Scharpf, Fritz W.
(1997) `Economic Integration, Democracy and the Welfare State', Journal of European Public Policy4: 18-36.
39.
Schmitt, Hermann
and Jacques Thomassen (eds) (1999) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Schmitter, Philippe
(1996) `Imagining the Future of the Euro-Polity with the Help of New Concepts', in Gary Markset al. (eds) Governance in the European Union, pp. 121-150. London: Sage.
41.
Thomassen, Jacques
and Hermann Schmitt (1999) `Introduction: Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union', in Hermann Schmitt and Jacques Thomassen (eds) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union, pp. 3-21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
Van der Eijk, Cees
and Mark Franklin (1996) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
43.
Weiler, J.H.H.
with Ulrich R. Haltern and Franz C. Mayer (1995) `European Democracy and Its Critique', West European Politics18(3): 4-39.
44.
Williams, Shirley
(1990) `Sovereignty and Accountability in the European Community', Political Quarterly61: 299-317.
45.
Williams, Shirley
(1991) `Sovereignty and Accountability in the European Community', in Robert O. Keohane and Stanley Hoffmann (eds) The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change.Boulder, CO: Westview.
