When the chambers of a bicameral legislature must negotiate to reach a decision outcome, the bargaining strength of each side is affected by the composition of its negotiating delegations. We examine some of the implications of this proposition for legislative negotiations between the European Parliament (EP) and the Council of Ministers. We develop and test hypotheses on how the bargaining success of the EP is affected by the choice of its chief negotiator, the rapporteur. Our findings support the argument that negotiators in a bicameral setting play a ‘two-level game’, where bargaining strength is shaped by the degree to which negotiators can credibly claim to be constrained by their parent chamber.
Achen CH ( 2006) Institutional realism and bargaining models. In: Thomson R, Stokman FN, Achen CH and König T (eds) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 86-123.
2.
Benedetto G. ( 2005) Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs: The dynamics of the codecision procedure in Europe’s Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy12(1): 67-88.
3.
Bueno de Mesquita B. ( 2003) Principles of International Politics: People’s Power, Preferences and Perceptions, 2nd edn. Washington DC: CQ Press.
4.
Bueno de Mesquita B and Stokman FN (eds) (1994) European Community Decision-making: Models Applications and Comparisons. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Corbett R., Jacobs F. and Shackleton M. ( 2005) The European Parliament, 6th edn. London: John Harper Publishing .
6.
Costello R. and Thomson R. ( 2010) The policy impact of leadership in committees: Rapporteurs’ influence on the European Parliament’s opinions. European Union Politics11(2): 219-241.
7.
Crombez C. ( 1997) The co-decision procedure in theEuropean Union. Legislative Studies Quarterly22(1): 97-119.
8.
European Parliament (2004) Conciliations and Codecision: A Guide to How Parliament Co-legislates. Brussels: European Parliament.
9.
European Parliament (2008) Working Group on Parliamentary Reform: Second Interim Report on Legislative Activities and Interinstitutional Relations. Brussels: European Parliament.
10.
European Parliament (2011) Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament(7th Parliamentary Term). Brussels: European Parliament.
11.
Farrell H. and Héritier A. ( 2004) Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision-making: Early agreements under co-decision and their impact on the European Parliament and Council. Comparative Political Studies37(10): 1184-1212.
12.
Häge F. and Kaeding M. ( 2007) Reconsidering the European Parliament’s legislative influence: Formal vs. informal procedures. Journal of European Integration29(3): 341-361.
13.
Hammond TH and Miller GJ ( 1987) The core of the constitution. American Political Science Review81(4): 1155-1174.
14.
Hix S. and Noury AG ( 2009) After enlargement: Voting patterns in the sixth European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly34(2): 159-174.
15.
Hix S., Noury AG and Roland G. ( 2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Hoyland B. ( 2006) Allocation of codecision reports in the fifth European Parliament. European Union Politics7(1): 30-50.
17.
Hug S. and König T. ( 2002) In view of ratification: Governmental preferences and domestic constraints at the Amsterdam intergovernmental conference. International Organization56(2): 447-476.
18.
König T., Lindburg B., Lechner S. and Pohlmeier W. ( 2007) Bicameral conflict resolution in the European Union: An empirical analysis of conciliation committee bargains. British Journal of Political Science37(2): 281-312.
19.
Krehbiel K., Shepsle KA and Weingast BR ( 1987) Why are Congressional committees powerful? American Political Science Review81(3): 935-945.
20.
Longley L. and Oleszek W. ( 1989) Bicameral Politics: Conference Committees in Congress . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
Mamadouh V. and Raunio T. ( 2003) The committee system: Powers, appointments and report allocation. Journal of Common Market Studies41(2): 333-352.
22.
Nagler J. ( 1989) Strategic implications of conferee selection in the House of Representatives: ‘It ain’t over till it’s over’ . American Politics Research17(1): 54-79.
23.
Napel S. and Widgrén M. ( 2006) The inter-institutional distribution of power in EU codecision . Social Choice and Welfare27(1): 129-154.
24.
Putnam RD ( 1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization42(3): 427-460.
25.
Schelling TC ( 1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Schneider G., Finke D. and Bailer S. ( 2010) Bargaining power in the European Union: An evaluation of competing game-theoretic models. Political Studies58(1): 85-103.
27.
Steunenberg B. ( 1997) Codecision and its reform: A comparative analysis of decision-making rules in the European Union. In: Steunenberg B and Van Vught F (eds) Political Institutions and Public Policy: Perspectives on European Decision-Making . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers , 205-229.
28.
Tallberg J. ( 2006) Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Thomson R. ( 2011) Resolving Controversy in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).
30.
Thomson R, Stokman FN, Achen CH and König T (eds) (2006) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
31.
Tsebelis G. and Garrett G. ( 2000) Legislative politics in theEuropean Union. European Union Politics1(1): 9-36.
32.
Tsebelis G. and Money J. ( 1997) Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Van den Bos JMM ( 1991) Dutch EC Policy Making: A Model Guided Approach to Coordination and Negotiation. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
34.
Warntjen A. ( 2008) The Council presidency: Power broker or burden? An empirical analysis. European Union Politics9(3): 315-388.
35.
White H. ( 1980) A heteroscedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test of heteroscedasticity. Econometrica48(4): 817-818.
36.
Yordanova N. ( 2011) Inter-institutional rules and the division of power in the European Parliament: Allocation of consultation and co-decision reports . West European Politics34(1): 97-121.
37.
Yoshinaka A., McElroy G. and Bowler S. ( 2010) The appointment of rapporteurs in theEuropean Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly35(4): 457-486.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
