The ‘Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness’ addressed the roles of donor and recipient country governments in the achievement of development that is more ‘fit for purpose’. This article considers progress on its implementation, specific to engagement with civil society.
It is argued that such engagement has not been adequately addressed. Core ethical issues remain unanswered. Who is development for? What should be its objectives? Why should civil society actors continue to engage in development that remains unfit for purpose in terms of achieving desirable outcomes? Who should decide on priorities and who should evaluate activities so as to achieve an honest appraisal of outcomes? Whose voices matter most, and to whom should donor and recipient country governments be accountable?
Accra 3rd HLF. 2008: Accra Agenda for Action: Final draft 25th July 2008.
2.
ActionAid. 2008: Making aid accountable and effective. The challenge for the Third High Level Forum on aid effectiveness. An ActionAid Ten Point Plan for real aid reform.
3.
AG-CS. 2007a: Concept Paper.
4.
AG-CS 2007b: Issues Paper.
5.
Agg, C.2006: Trends in government support for non-governmental organisations – is the ‘golden age’ of the NGO behind Us? UNRISD Civil Society and Social Movements’ Programme Paper (23).
6.
Agulhas Development Consultants Ltd. 2006: Do country-led approaches deliver results? A synthesis of emerging evidence.
7.
Burall, S. and Maxwell, S. with A. Rocha Menocal . 2006: Reforming the international aid architecture: Options and ways forward. Overseas’ Development Institute ; Working Paper 278.
8.
Civil Society Voices for Better Aid. 2008: Civil society statement in Accra warns urgency for action on aid. 1st September 2008.
9.
COWI Evaluation Team. 2006: Evaluation of DFID’s policy and practice in support of gender equality and women’s empowerment. Thematic Studies: Volume 3. DFID Evaluation Report Ev669.
10.
DFID. 2005: Using drivers of change to improve aid effectiveness. Briefing November 2005: a DFID Practice Paper.
11.
DFID 2006a: How to use PRBS to make progress on sector and crosscutting issues: Evidence and guidance. Background Note: Draft 4 (November 2006).
12.
DFID 2006b: DFID’s medium-term action plan on aid effectiveness: Our response to the Paris Declaration. DFID: Donor Policy and Partnerships’ Team; Policy Division .
13.
DFID 2007: How does General Budget Support affect ownership and accountability? The Joint Evaluation of General Budget Support: Thematic Briefing Papers (4).
14.
DFID (not dated) 2007–8: Webpage on Direct Budget Support.
15.
Eberli, W.2007: Accountability in Poverty Reduction Strategies: The role of empowerment and participation. The World Bank: Social Development Dept ; Participation and Civil Engagement Team. Social Development Papers: Paper 104.
16.
Eurodad. 2008: Turning the tables: Aid and accountability under the Paris framework; a civil society report. European Network on Debt and Development: a joint NGO report written by L. Hayes and J. Pereira.
17.
Eurodad. 2007: Brief analysis of 2006 monitoring survey. Briefing by Lucy Hayes.
18.
Evans, A.2007: ODI Annual Report. Overseas’ Development Institute : Comment from the Director of Programmes, Poverty and Public Policy.
19.
Foresti, M. , Booth, D. and O’Neill, T.2006: Aid effectiveness and human rights: strengthening the implementation of the Paris Declaration. Overseas’ Development Institute .
20.
Fleming S , M Cox , K Sen , K Wright-Revolledo . 2007: Strengthening the Poverty Impact of the Paris Declaration: Aid Effectiveness evidence gathering project on gender equality, human rights and social exclusion. Conceptual Framework and Partnership Strategy. Background documents for phase 2. Report prepared for DFID.
21.
FRIDE. 2008: ‘ From Paris to Accra: Building the global governance of aid ’. Fundación para les Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior. Development in Context (16); August 2008.
22.
German Marshall Fund of the US and Eurodad. 2008: Harmonization and alignment: challenges and opportunities for US and European donors post-Accra.
23.
Green, M.2006: Technical consultation of global partners’ forum on children affected by HIV and AIDS. Improving outcomes for children affected by HIV and AIDS: recapacitating social policy and the state in Africa. University of Manchester: Department of Social Anthropology .
24.
Gruber, J.2007: Interim evaluation of ‘Taking Action’: The UK government’s strategy for tackling HIV and AIDS in the developing world. Working Paper 2: report on women, young people and vulnerable groups. Draft internal report.
25.
Hayes, L.2008: Bank both player and referee in road to Accra. Eurodad .
26.
HLSP. 2006: Strengthening the links: Integrating work on sexual and reproductive health, HIV and AIDS: Key issues, challenges and opportunities for scaling up. Findings and recommendations of a DFID study.
27.
International Civil Society Steering Group for the Accra HLF. 2007: From Paris 2005 to Accra 2008: Will aid become more accountable and effective? A critical approach to the aid effectiveness agenda.
28.
International Civil Society Steering Group. 2008a: Better aid: A civil society position paper for the 2008 Accra High Level Forum on aid effectiveness.
29.
International Civil Society Steering Group 2008b: Without concrete commitments, the Accra outcome will be an agenda for inaction. Response from the CSO International Steering Group to the Final Draft of the Accra Agenda for Action (25 July 2008).
30.
IDD and Associates. 2006: Evaluation of General Budget Support: synthesis report. A joint evaluation of GBS 1994–2004. Birmingham University: International Development Department; School of Public Policy .
31.
IDD and DFID. 2007a: What are the effects of General Budget Support? The joint evaluation of GBS 1994–2004. Thematic Briefing Paper 1.
32.
IDD and DFID 2007b: How can the risks of GBS be managed? The joint evaluation of GBS 1994–2004. Thematic Briefing Paper 3.
33.
IDD and DFID 2007c: How does GBS affect ownership and accountability? The joint evaluation of GBS 1994–2004. Thematic Briefing Paper 4.
34.
Lavergne, R. and Wood, J.2006: Aid effectiveness and non-state partnerships: analytical considerations. Paper provided for Canadian CIDA.
35.
Payne L and S Neville2006: Aid instruments: social exclusion and gender. Social Development Direct: background paper for DFID; Internal Guidance on Aid Instruments.
36.
Wanyeki, Muthoni L.2006: Implementing the Paris Declaration: A southern civil society experience. In The Reality of Aid et al. (2007).
37.
ODI. 2007: Voice for accountability: Citizens, the state and realistic governance. London: Overseas’ Development Institute .
38.
ODI, Christian Michelsen Institute, Economic and Social Research Foundation and Center for Democratic Development. 2008: Good governance, aid modalities and poverty reduction. From better theory to better practice. Research project (RP-05-GG) for the Advisory Board for Irish Aid.
39.
OECD-DAC. 2005: Paris Declaration on aid effectiveness: ownership, harmonisation, alignment, results and mutual accountability.
40.
OECD-DAC GOVNET. 2005: Lessons learned on the use of power and drivers of change analyses in development co-operation. Review commissioned by the OECD-DAC Network on Governance (GOVNET).
41.
OECD. 2007: 2006 survey on monitoring the Paris Declaration – overview of the results.
42.
OECD DAC Secretariat. 2008a: DAC news: Ideas on aid (July 2008).
43.
OECD DAC Secretariat 2008b: ‘International aid in transition: Reporting on the views of Jan Cedergren, Chair of the OECD-DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness’. DAC news: Ideas on aid (July 2008).
44.
Payne, L. and Neville, S.2006: Aid instruments: Social exclusion and gender. Social Development Direct: background paper for DFID; internal guidance on aid instruments.
45.
Social Development Direct (SDD), Working Together Ltd and Oxford Policy Management (OPM). 2008a: Making aid more effective through gender, rights and inclusion: Evidence from implementing the Paris Declaration. Analytical summary.
46.
Social Development Direct (SDD), Working Together Ltd and Oxford Policy Management (OPM). 2008b: Making aid more effective through gender, rights and inclusion: Evidence from implementing the Paris Declaration. Additional case studies.
47.
TGNP. 2005: Personal communication: Inputs on equity and gender to PRS II development discussions.
The Reality of Aid, CCIC and BOND. 2007: ‘The Paris Declaration: Towards aid effectiveness?’. Reality Check (January 2007).
50.
The Reality of Aid Management Committee. 2008: The reality of aid 2008. Aid effectiveness: Democratic ownership and human rights.
51.
Tomlinson, B.2006: The Paris Declaration and aid effectiveness: Donor commitments and civil society critiques. In The Reality of Aid et al. (2007).
52.
UNAIDS, UNDP and the World Bank. 2005: Main-streaming AIDS in development instruments and processes at the national level.
53.
UNDP. 2006: Capacity development and aid effectiveness. A UNPD capacity development resource. UNDP: Capacity Development Group; Bureau for Development Policy . Conference paper working draft (November 2006).
54.
UN Millennium Campaign and OECD. 2008: Reaching our development goals: Why does aid effectiveness matter?
55.
WP-EFF. 2008: Civil society and aid effectiveness. Synthesis of findings and recommendations. 2nd working draft (30 May 2008).
56.
Wright-Revolledo, K.2007: Diverse state-society relations: Implications of implementing the Paris Declaration. INTRAC .
