The production of social knowledge in all international organizations is problematic because all are public bureaucracies. The World Bank provides a case study of the problems of managing in-house research in an international public bureaucracy. Not only are there managerial constraints on what the Bank is willing to publish, but the binding constraints on publication evolve. The evolution in managerial objectives at the Bank in recent years and the factors that have influenced shifts in its rhetoric and policy are examined. Are these adjustments merely rhetorical? Recent research on poverty reduction, governance and conditionality is discussed to gauge how far the Bank has moved.
Ansari, J.A.1986: The political economy of international economic organization.
Rienner
.
2.
Armendariz, B.
and
Ferreira, F.1995: The World Bank and the analysis of the international debt crisis. In
Harriss, J.
,
Hunter, J.
and
Lewis, C.M.
, editors, The new institutional economics and Third World development.
Routledge
, 215–29.
3.
Barber, W.J.1990: Government as a laboratory for economic learning in the years of the Democratic Roosevelt. In
Furner, M.O.
and
Supple, B.
, editors, The state and economic knowledge: the American and British experiences.
Cambridge University Press
, 111–14.
4.
Basu, K.2003:
Globalization and the politics of international finance: The Stiglitz Verdict
. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XLI,
885–99
.
5.
Booth, D.
, editor, 2003: Fighting poverty in Africa: are PRSPs making a difference?,
Overseas Development Institute
.
6.
Chang, Ha-J.
editor, 2001: Joseph Stiglitz and the World Bank. The rebel within.
Anthem Press
.
7.
Collier, P.2000: Conditionality, dependence and coordination: three current debates in aid policy. In
Gilbert, C.
and
Vines, D.
, editors, The World Bank: structure and reform.
Cambridge University Press
.
8.
Diwan I.
and
Husain I.1989: Dealing with the debt crisis.
Washington DC: World Bank
.
9.
Dollar, D.
and
Svensson, J.2000:
What explains the success or failure of structural adjustment programmes?
, Economic Journal, 110 (October),
894–917
.
10.
Eaton, J.
and
Gersovitz, M.1981:
Debt with potential repudiation: theoretical and empirical analysis
, Review of Economic Studies, 48,
289–309
.
11.
Edwards, M.1999: Future positive: International cooperation in the 21st century.
Earthscan
.
12.
Gavin, M.
and
Rodrik, D.1995:
The World Bank in historical perspective
. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 85,
329–34
.
13.
Gerth, H.H.
and
Mills, C.W.
, editors, 1946: From Max Weber: Essays in sociology.
Oxford University Press
.
14.
Hewitt, A.2003: Evaluation of trade conditions in PRSPs,
London ODI
.
15.
Kapur D.
,
Lewis
and
Webb
. 1997: The World Bank: Its first half-century, II,
611–734
.
16.
Killick, T.1998: Aid and the political economy of change.
Routledge
.
17.
Killick, T.2004:
Politics, evidence and the new aid agenda
. Development Policy Review22,
5–29
.
18.
Lucas, R.E.1998:
On the mechanics of economic development
. Journal of Monetary Economics22,
3–42
.
19.
Magnus, J.R.
and
Morgan, M.S.1987:
The ET interview: Professor J. Tinbergen
. Econometric Theory3,
117–42
.
20.
Mason, E.S.
and
Asher, R.E.1973: The World Bank since Bretton Woods,
Brookings Institution
.
21.
Miller-Adams, M.1999: The World Bank. New agendas in a changing world.
Routledge
.
22.
Mosley, P.
,
Harrigan, J.
and
Toye, J.1995: Aid and power: The World Bank and policy-based lending, 2 vols.
Routledge
, 2nd edition.
23.
Mosley, P.
,
Noorbaksh, F.
and
Paloni, A.2003: Compliance with World Bank Conditionality: Implications for the Selectivity Approach to Policy-based Lending and the Design of Conditionality. CREDIT Research Paper No. 03/20,
University of Nottingham
.
24.
Rudolph, L.I.
and
Rudolph, S.H.1979:
Authority and power in bureaucratic and patrimonial administration: A revisionist interpretation of Weber on bureaucracy
. World Politics38,
195–227
.
25.
Scott, M.F.G.1989: A new theory of economic growth.
Oxford University Press
.
26.
Squire, L.2000: Why the World Bank should be involved in development research. In
Gilbert, C.L.
and
Vines, D.
, editors, The World Bank: Structure and policies.
Cambridge University Press
, 108–33.
27.
Stern, N.
and
Ferreira, F.1997: The World Bank as an ‘Intellectual Actor’. In
Kapur, D.
,
Lewis, J.P.
and
Webb, R.
, editors, The World Bank: Its first half century 2: Perspectives,
Brookings Institution
. 523–610.
28.
Stiglitz, J.E.2001: More instruments and broader goals: Moving towards the post-Washington Consensus. In
Chang, Ha-J.
, editor, Stiglitz, Joseph and the World Bank: The rebel within.
Anthem Press
, 17–56.
29.
Stiglitz, J.E.2002: Globalization and its discontents.
Allen Lane
.
30.
Tinbergen, J.1958: The Design of Development.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press for IBRD
.
31.
Tooze, J.A.2001: Statistics and the German state, 1900–1945: The making of modern economic knowledge.
Cambridge University Press
.
32.
Toye, J.1993: Dilemmas of development.
Oxford, Basil Blackwell
, (1987).
33.
Toye, J.
and
Toye, R.2004: The UN and Global Political Economy.
Indiana University Press
.
34.
Wade, R.1996:
Japan, the World Bank and the art of paradigm maintenance: The east Asian miracle in political perspective
. New Left Review, May–June.
3–36
.
35.
Wade, R.1997: The Greening of the Bank: The struggle over the environment 1970–1995. In
Kapur, D.
,
Lewis, J.P.
and
Webb, R.
, editors, The World Bank, II, 611–734.
36.
Wade, R.2001:
Showdown at the World Bank
. New Left Review, 2nd Series No. 7,
124–37
.
37.
Williamson, J.1990: What Washington means by policy reform. In
Williamson, J.
, editor, Latin American adjustment: How much has happened?Institute for International Economics
.
38.
Woods, N.2003: Order, justice, the IMF and the World Bank. In
Foot, R.
,
Gaddis, J.L.
and
Hurrell, A.
, editors, Order and justice in international relations.
Oxford University Press
, 80–102.
