Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-5
The news expectation predicament: Comparing and explaining what audiences expect from the roles and reporting practices of reporters on right-wing extremism
News about right-wing extremism pertains to the media’s information and watchdog functions in democratic societies. Since audience orientation is important to the journalistic profession, it is important to know what different news audiences expect of journalists regarding their professional role and their reporting practices when it comes to media coverage of right-wing extremism. To bridge this research gap, by employing a quota sample representative of the general German population (n = 1314) and an independent sample of Muslims living in Germany (n = 248), we demonstrated that Muslims expect a more active role from journalists and even accept controversial reporting practices to combat right-wing extremism. More left-leaning individuals were found to expect more controversial reporting unless they were afraid of right-wing extremism. Among these more left individuals, fear of terrorism seems to activate the argument that a democratic society should not give up its core principles, including the professional autonomy of its journalists and ethical reporting practices.
BaugutPNeumannK (2019a) Die Beziehungen zwischen Journalisten und Rechtsextremisten. Wechselseitige Wahrnehmungen, Ziele und Interaktionen [Relations between journalists and right-wing extremists. Mutual perceptions, goals and interactions]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft67(2): 144–166.
2.
BaugutPNeumannK (2019b) How right-wing extremists use and perceive news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly96(3): 696–720.
3.
BaugutPScherrS (2017) Who justifies questionable reporting practices? Answers from a representative survey of journalists in Germany. Global Media Journal7(1): 1–5.
4.
BreckenridgeJNZimbardoPGSweetonJL (2010) After years of media coverage, can one more video report trigger heuristic judgments? A national study of American terrorism risk perceptions. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression2(3): 163–178.
5.
DarlingtonRBHayesAF (2017) Regression Analysis and Linear Models: Concepts, Applications, and Implementation. London: Guilford.
6.
EllinasAA (2018) Media and the radical right. In: RydgrenJ (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.269–284.
HanitzschT (2007) Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a universal theory. Communication Theory17(4): 367–385.
9.
HanitzschTVosTPStandaertO, et al. (2019) Role orientations: Journalists’ views on their place in society. In: HanitzschTHanuschFRamaprasadJ, et al. (eds) Worlds of Journalism: Journalistic Cultures around the Globe. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
10.
HaugSMüssigSStichsA (2009) Muslimisches Leben in Deutschland [Muslim life in Germany]. Available at: https://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Forschung/ Forschungsberichte/fb06-muslimisches-leben.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=11
11.
HeiderDMcCombsMPoindexterPM (2005) What the public expects of local news: Views on public and traditional journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly82(4): 952–967.
12.
HeiseNWiebkeLReimerJ, et al. (2014) Including the audience: Comparing the attitudes and expectations of journalists and users towards participation in German TV news journalism. Journalism Studies 15(4): 411–430.
13.
JostJTNapierJLThorisdottirH, et al. (2007) Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin33(7): 989–1007.
14.
JungHGilJ-A (2019) Does college education make people politically liberal? Evidence from a natural experiment in South Korea. Social Science Research81: 209–220.
15.
KallisA (2018) The radical right and Islamophobia. In: RydgrenJ (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.42–60.
16.
KepplingerHMKnirschK (2001) The relevance of Weberian ethics for contemporary journalism. European Journal of Communication16(1): 5–23.
17.
LambeJLCaplanSECaiX, et al. (2004) Public perceptions of media performance at the beginning of the war on terrorism. Communication Research Reports21(3): 299–309.
18.
LeeT-T (2010) Why they don’t trust the media: An examination of factors predicting trust. American Behavioral Scientist54(1): 8–21.
19.
LidbergJMullerD (2018) In the Name of Security: Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism. London: Anthem Press.
20.
MakovecM (2020) An den Grenzen der Demokratie: Die diskursive Konstruktion des Rechtsextremismus zwischen Normalität und Illegitimität [At the limits of democracy: The discursive construction of right-wing extremism between normality and illegitimacy]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
21.
MattesAGoetschKRosenbergerS (2017) Restoring routine by debating tolerance? Discursive responses to jihadist terrorist attacks. Politics, Religion & Ideology18(3): 264–281.
22.
McLeodDMPerseESignorielliN, et al. (1993) Public perceptions and evaluations of the function of the media in the Persian Gulf War. In: GreenbergBSGantzW (eds) Desert Storm and the Mass Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp.197–212.
23.
NahSChungDS (2012) When citizens meet both professional and citizen journalists: Social trust, media credibility, and perceived journalistic roles among online community news readers. Journalism13(6): 714–730.
24.
NeumannPR (2013) The trouble with radicalization. International Affairs89: 873–893.
25.
NorrisPInglehartR (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
ÖrnebringH (2020) Journalistic autonomy. In: Örnebring H (ed.) The Oxford Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. Oxford University Press, pp.762–778.
27.
PassiniSVillanoP (2018) Left-right orientation and electoral choices: Divergences in the relationships with authority and out-groups. Psychological Reports121(6): 1131–1146.
28.
PlaisancePLSkewesEAHanitzschT (2012) Ethical orientations of journalists around the globe: Implications from a cross-national survey. Communication Research39(5): 641–661.
29.
RamaprasadJHanitzschTLaukE, et al. (2019) Ethical considerations: Journalists’ perceptions of professional practice. In: HanitzschTHanuschFRamaprasadJ, et al. (eds) Worlds of Journalism: Journalistic Cultures around the Globe. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
30.
ReichJWInfurnaFJ (2016) Perceived Control: Theory, Research, and Practice in the First 50 Years. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
ReinemannCStanyerJScherrS, et al. (2012). Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 221–239.
32.
SaleemMWojcieszakMEHawkinsI, et al. (2019) Social identity threats: How media and discrimination affect Muslim Americans’ identification as Americans and trust in the U.S. government. Journal of Communication69(2): 214–236.
33.
SlovicPFinucaneMLPetersE, et al. (2007) The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research177(3): 1333–1352.
34.
ThorisdottirHJostJTLiviatanI, et al. (2007) Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly71(2): 175–203.
35.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology5(2): 207–232.
36.
van der WurffRSchoenbachK (2014) Civic and citizen demands of news media and journalists: What does the audience expect from good journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly91(3): 433–451.
VosTPEichholzMKaraliovaT (2019) Audiences and journalistic capital. Journalism Studies20(7): 1009–1027.
39.
WeaverDHWilhoitGC (1996) The American Journalist in the 1990s: U.S. News People at the End of An Era. LEA’s Communication Series. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40.
WeaverDHWillnatL (2012) Journalists in the 21st century: Conclusions. In: WeaverDHWillnatL (eds) The Global Journalist in the 21st Century. New York: Routledge, pp.529–551.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
