Attracting the news: Algorithms,platforms,and reframing incidental exposure

Abstract

This article argues for new approaches to the study of incidental exposure that better account for the role of algorithms, platforms, and processes of datafication in shaping the likelihood of news exposure online. It offers a critique of three themes prominent in the incidental exposure literature: (1) incidental exposure connotes accidental exposure to news on social media, (2) news content is ubiquitous on social media, and (3) incidental exposure can be conceptually distinguished from intentional exposure to news on social media. This article proposes a new metaphor to reframe research on incidental exposure: ‘attraction’ to news.

Keywords

Incidental exposure social media information inequality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmadi

Wohn

(2018) The antecedents of incidental news exposure on social media. Social Media+ Society 4(2): 2056305118772827.

Ananny

(2016) Toward an ethics of algorithms: Convening, observation, probability, and timeliness. Science, Technology, & Human Values 41(1): 93–117.

Baum

(2002) Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review 96(1): 91–109.

Bell

Owen

Brown

, et al. (2017) The platform press: How Silicon Valley reengineered journalism. Available at: https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8R216ZZ

Boczkowski

Mitchelstein

Matassi

(2018) News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New Media & Society 20(10): 3523–3539.

Bode

(2016) Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society 19(1): 24–48.

Bucher

(2012) Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society 14(7): 1164–1180.

DeVito

(2017) From editors to algorithms: A values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed. Digital Journalism 5(6): 753–773.

Downs

(1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.

10.

Facebook (n.d.) Available at: https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/

11.

Feezell

(2018) Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly 71(2): 482–494.

12.

Fletcher

Nielsen

(2018) Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society 20(7): 2450–2468.

13.

Gil de Zúñiga

Weeks

Ardèvol-Abreu

(2017) Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 22(3): 105–123.

14.

Haenschen

(2019) Self-reported versus digitally recorded: Measuring political activity on Facebook. Social Science Computer Review. Epub ahead of print 16 January. DOI: 10.1177/0894439318813586.

15.

Kaiser

Keller

Kleinen-von Königslöw

(2018) Incidental news exposure on Facebook as a social experience: The influence of recommender and media cues on news selection. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 23 October. DOI: 0.1177/0093650218803529.

16.

Kantrowitz

(2018) 18 February. Available at: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/alexkantrowitz/facebook-wont-release-its-5-of-news-feed-content-is-news

17.

Karnowski

Kümpel

Leonhard

, et al. (2017) From incidental news exposure to news engagement. How perceptions of the news post and news usage patterns influence engagement with news articles encountered on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 76: 42–50.

18.

Kim

Chen

De Zúñiga

(2013) Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior 29(6): 2607–2614.

19.

Kim

Hsu

Neiman

, et al. (2018) The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication 35(4): 515–541.

20.

Klinger

Svensson

(2015) The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society 17(8): 1241–1257.

21.

Kreiss

McGregor

(2018) Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 US presidential cycle. Political Communication 35(2): 155–177.

22.

Krippendorff

(1993) Major metaphors of communication and some constructivist reflections on their use. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 2(1): 3.

23.

Kümpel

(2018) The issue takes it all? Incidental news exposure and news engagement on Facebook. Digital Journalism 7: 165–186.

24.

Kümpel

(this issue) The Matthew Effect in social media news use: Assessing inequalities in news exposure and news engagement on social network sites (SNS). Journalism.

25.

Lee

Tandoc

Jr (2017) When news meets the audience: How audience feedback online affects news production and consumption. Human Communication Research 43(4): 436–449.

26.

Lee

Kim

(2017) Incidental exposure to news: Predictors in the social media setting and effects on information gain online. Computers in Human Behavior 75: 1008–1015.

27.

Meadows

(2008) Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

28.

Mendoza

(2018) Inside the local news subscriptions accelerator: Publishers share their results. Available at: https://facebookjournalismproject.com/article/inside-the-local-news-subscriptions-accelerator-publishers-share-their-results/

29.

Min

(2010) From the digital divide to the democratic divide: Internet skills, political interest, and the second-level digital divide in political internet use. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 7(1): 22–35.

30.

Möller

van de Velde

Merten

, et al. (2019) Explaining online news engagement based on browsing behavior: Creatures of habit? Social Science Computer Review. Epub ahead of print 10 February. DOI: 10.1177/0894439319828012.

31.

Müller

Schneiders

Schäfer

(2016) Appetizer or main dish? Explaining the use of Facebook news posts as a substitute for other news sources. Computers in Human Behavior 65: 431–441.

32.

Napoli

(2014) Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption. Communication Theory 24(3): 340–360.

33.

Nielsen

Ganter

(2018) Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society 20(4): 1600–1617.

34.

Oeldorf-Hirsch

(2018) The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media. Mass Communication and Society 21(2): 225–247.

35.

Oxford Dictionaries (n.d.) Incidental. Available at: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/incidental

36.

Pew Research Center (n.d.) Available at: https://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018/

37.

Prior

(2007) Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

38.

Srnicek

(2017) Platform Capitalism. Polity. Cambridge, UK.

39.

Statt

(2019) Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/30/18523265/facebook-events-groups-redesign-news-feed-features-f8-2019

40.

Strömbäck

Djerf-Pierre

Shehata

(2013) The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25(4): 414–435.

41.

Tewksbury

Weaver

Maddex

(2001) Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 78(3): 533–554.

42.

Thorson

Wells

(2016) Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory 26(3): 309–328.

43.

Thorson

Cotter

Medeiros

, et al. (2019a) Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society. Epub ahead of print 1 January. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642934.

44.

Thorson

Medeiros

Cotter

, et al. (2019b) Platforms, algorithms, and unequal exposure to news. Unpublished Manuscript.

45.

Thorson

Edgerly

(2018) Political inequalities start at home: Parents, children, and the socialization of civic infrastructure online. Political Communication 35(2): 178–195.

46.

Valeriani

Vaccari

(2016) Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society 18(9): 1857–1874.

47.

Van Aelst

Strömbäck

Aalberg

, et al. (2017) Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association 41(1): 3–27.

48.

Van Dijck

(2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society 12(2): 197–208.

49.

Van Dijck

Poell

De Waal

(2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

50.

Webster

(2011) The duality of media: A structurational theory of public attention. Communication Theory 21(1): 43–66.

51.

Welbers

Van Atteveldt

Kleinnijenhuis

, et al. (2016) News selection criteria in the digital age: Professional norms versus online audience metrics. Journalism 17(8): 1037–1053.

52.

Wells

Thorson

(2017) Combining big data and survey techniques to model effects of political content flows in Facebook. Social Science Computer Review 35(1): 33–52.

53.

Yadamsuren

Erdelez

(2010) Incidental exposure to online news. In: Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T annual meeting on navigating streams in an information ecosystem, Pittsburgh, PA, 23–28 October, vol. 47, p. 22. Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science.

54.

Yurieff

Kelley

(2019) 10 April. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/10/tech/facebook-integrity-updates/index.html