This study examines the use of the term ‘radical Islam’ as a framing device from two perspectives. First, a content analysis of The New York Times and Washington Post suggested that ‘radical Islam’ is a recent addition to the public lexicon and is rapidly rising in use. The term is more recently associated with negatively charged language and linked to terrorism. Second, an experiment showed that reading about a perpetrator associated with ‘radical Islam’ (as opposed to ‘terrorism’) led to an increase in Islamophobia among all participants – indicated through fear of Muslims and Islam. An interaction effect emerged such that self-identified conservatives did not differentiate between ‘radical Islam’ and ‘terrorism’ when determining culpability, but self-identified liberals did. These results indicate that the US news media has increasingly linked ‘radical Islam’ with terrorism and other negative ideas, while some sectors of the American public struggle to disentangle the two concepts.
AhmedSMatthesJ (2016) Media representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A meta-analysis. International Communication Gazette79(3): 219–244.
2.
AliWCliftonEDussM, et al. (2011) Fear, Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Available at: http://www.americanprogress.org
AyoobM (2008) The Many Faces of Political Islam. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5.
BadiouA (2014) Infinite Thought: Truth and the Return to Philosophy. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
6.
BaleJM (2009) Islamism and totalitarianism. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions10(2): 73–96.
7.
BantimaroudisP (2015) A mediated assessment of Samuel Huntington’s ‘Clash of Civilizations’: The cultural framing hypothesis. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics11(1): 73–85.
BleichE (2011) What is Islamophobia and how much is there? Theorizing and measuring an emerging comparative concept. American Behavioral Scientist55: 1581–1600.
10.
BleichS (2007) Is it all in a word? The effect of issue framing on public support for U.S. spending on HIV/AIDS in developing countries. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12(2): 120–132.
11.
BoweBJ (2014) Framing Moral Evaluations: Moral Foundations in U.S. Newspaper Coverage of Mosque Controversies (Doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich.
12.
BoweBJHoeweJ (2016) Night and day: An illustration of framing and moral foundations in the Oklahoma shariah amendment campaign. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly93(4): 967–985.
13.
BoweBJHoeweJ (2011) Clash of coverage: Cultural framing in U.S. newspaper reporting on the 2011 protests in Bahrain. Middle East Media Educator1(1): 27–36.
14.
BoweBJFahmySWantaW (2013) Missing religion: Second level agenda setting and Islam in American newspapers. International Communication Gazette75(7): 636–653.
15.
BoweBJMakkiTW (2016) Muslim neighbors or an Islamic threat? A constructionist framing analysis of newspaper coverage of mosque controversies. Media, Culture and Society38(4): 540–558.
16.
BradburyJ (2009) Radical parties. In: McLeanIMcMillanA (eds) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
BuhrmesterMKwangTGoslingSD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science6(1): 3–5.
18.
CacciatoreMAScheufeleDAIyengarS (2016) The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society19(1): 7–23.
19.
CalfanoBRDjupePACoxD, et al. (2016) Muslim mistrust: The resilience of negative public attitudes after complimentary information. Journal of Media and Religion15(1): 29–42.
20.
CarneyDRJostJTGoslingSD, et al. (2008) The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology29(6): 807–840.
21.
D’AngeloP (2002) News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication52(4): 870–888.
22.
DixonTL (2006) Schemas as average conceptions: Skin tone, television news exposure, and culpability judgments. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly83(1): 131–149.
23.
DixonTL (2008) Crime news and racialized beliefs: Understanding the relationship between local news viewing and perceptions of African Americans and crime. Journal of Communication58(1): 106–125.
24.
DonohueWLiangYDruckmanD (2014) Validating LIWC dictionaries: The Oslo I accords. Journal of Language and Social Psychology33(3): 282–301.
25.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
26.
EntmanRM (2003) Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication20: 415–432.
27.
EntmanRM (2004) Projections of Power Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
28.
EspositoJL (2003) The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
GolanG (2006) Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage. Journalism Studies7(2): 323–333.
30.
GrossK (2008) Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology29(2): 169–192.
31.
HallidayF (1999) ‘Islamophobia’ reconsidered. Ethnic and Racial Studies22(5): 892–902.
32.
HoeweJ (2012) The Othering of terrorists: Elite U.S. newspapers’ use of the word terrorist and the subsequent mention of religion. In de BuitragoS. Reinke (Ed.), Portraying the Other in international relations: Cases of Othering, their dynamics, and the potential for transformation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
33.
HuntingtonSP (1993) The clash of civilizations?Foreign Affairs72(3): 22–49.
34.
IyengarS (1987) Television news and citizens’ explanations of national affairs. The American Political Science Review81(3): 815–831.
35.
JostJTGlaserJKruglanskiAW, et al. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin129(3): 339–375.
36.
JostJTNapierJLThorisdottirH, et al. (2007) Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin33(7): 989–1007.
37.
KahnJHTobinRMMasseyAE, et al. (2007) Measuring emotional expression with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. The American Journal of Psychology120(2): 263–286.
38.
KhalidiR (2009) Sowing Crisis the Cold War and American Dominance in the Middle East. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
39.
KhwailehTKhuwailehA (2012) The semantic confusing connotation of terrorism: Terminologies generated in Arabic and used in English. Babel58(1): 19–30.
40.
KunstJRSamDLUllebergP (2013) Perceived Islamophobia: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations37(2): 225–237.
41.
LeshnerG (2017) Experiment, laboratory. In: MatthesJDavisCSPotterRF (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0096.
MamdaniM (2002) Good Muslim, bad Muslim: A political perspective on culture and terrorism. American Anthropologist104(3): 766–775.
46.
MasonWSuriS (2012) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods44(1): 1–23.
47.
MatthesJ (2012) Framing politics: An integrative approach. American Behavioral Scientist56(3): 247–259.
48.
NacosBLTorres-ReynaO (2006) Fueling Our Fears: Stereotyping, Media Coverage, and Public Opinion of Muslim Americans. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
49.
NelsonTEClawsonRAOxleyZM (1997) Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. The American Political Science Review91(3): 567–583.
PaolacciGChandlerJIpeirotisP (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making5(5): 411–419.
52.
PennebakerJWKingLA (1999) Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(6): 1296–1312.
53.
PennebakerJWSlatcherRBChungCK (2005) Linguistic markers of psychological state through media interviews: John Kerry and John Edwards in 2004, Al Gore in 2000. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy5(1): 197–204.
54.
PowellKA (2011) Framing Islam: An analysis of U.S. media coverage of terrorism since 9/11. Communication Studies62(1): 90–112.
55.
ReeseSD (2007) The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication57: 148–154.
StolzJ (2005) Explaining Islamophobia. A test of four theories based on the case of a Swiss city. Swiss Journal of Sociology31(3): 547–566.
60.
TankardJW (2001) The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In: ReeseSGandyOHGrantAE (eds) Framing Public Life. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 95–106.
61.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science211(4481): 453–458.
62.
VargoCJGuoL (2017) Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda setting: An analysis of traditional, partisan, and emerging online U.S. news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(4): 1031–1055.
63.
VliegenthartR (2012) Framing in mass communication research–An overview and assessment. Sociology Compass6(12): 937–948.
64.
VliegenthartRvan ZoonenL (2011) Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication26(2): 101–115.
65.
von SikorskiCSchmuckDMatthesJ, et al. (2017) ‘Muslims are not terrorists’: Islamic State coverage, journalistic differentiation between terrorism and Islam, fear reactions, and attitudes toward Muslims. Mass Communication and Society20(6): 825–848.
66.
WickhamC (2002) Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism, and Political Change in Egypt. New York: Columbia University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
