This study used the dual-coding hypothesis to examine how melodramatic animation in crime news reports affects news learning among older children in Hong Kong. In total, 74 older children (mean age = 15.3) were exposed to news videos that either did or did not include melodramatic animation. The results showed that melodramatic animation helped the participants learn the news. The social implications of the results are discussed.
BerryCBrosiusH-B (1991) Multiple effects of visual format on TV news learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology5(6): 519–528.
3.
BioccaFKimJChoiY (2001) Visual touch in virtual environments: An exploratory study of presence, multimodal interfaces, and cross-modal sensory illusions. Presence10(3): 247–265.
4.
ButlerACZarombFMLyleKB, et al. (2009) Using popular films to enhance classroom learning. Psychological Science20(9): 1161–1168.
5.
ChanKMcNealJU (2003) Parent-child communications about consumption and advertising in China. Journal of Consumer Marketing20(4): 317–334.
6.
ChanLinLJ (2000) Attributes of animation for learning scientific knowledge. Journal of Instructional Psychology24(4): 228–238.
7.
ChengBKLLoWH (2012) Can news be imaginative? An experiment testing the perceived credibility of melodramatic animated news, news organizations, media use, and media dependency. Electronic News6(3): 131–150.
8.
ChengBKLLoWH (2015) The effects of melodramatic animation in crime-related news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly92(3): 559–579.
9.
ClarkJMPaivioA (1991) Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review3(3): 149–210.
EitelAScheiterKSchülerA, et al. (2013) How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction28: 48–63.
13.
EvelandWP (2002) News information processing as mediator of the relationship between motivations and political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly79(1): 26–40.
14.
FindahlOHoijerB (1981) Media content and human comprehension. In: RosengrenKE (ed.) Advances in Content Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 111–132.
15.
FlanaginAJMetzgerMJ (2007) The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media & Society9(2): 319–342.
16.
FoxJRLangAChungY, et al. (2004) Picture this: Effects of graphics on the processing of television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media48(4): 646–674.
17.
GlaserMGarsoffkyBSchwanS (2012) What do we learn from docutainment? Processing hybrid television documentaries. Learning and Instruction22(1): 37–46.
18.
GraberDA (1990) Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication40(3): 134–156.
19.
GrimesT (1990) Audio-video correspondence and its role in attention and memory. Educational Technology Research and Development38(3): 15–25.
20.
GunterBFurnhamAGriffithsS (2000) Children’s memory for news: A comparison of three presentation media. Media Psychology2(2): 93–118.
21.
JaumeNAAbbissMWrayJ, et al. (2015) CHILDSPLA: A collaboration between children and researchers to design and animate health states. Child Care, Health and Development41(6): 1140–1151.
22.
JohnDR (1999) Consumer socialization of children: A retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research26(3): 183–213.
KimTBioccaF (1997) Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication3(2): p. JCMC325.
25.
KiousisS (2006) Exploring the impact of modality on perceptions of credibility for online news stories. Journalism Studies7(2): 348–359.
26.
KnightAD (2007) Who is a Journalist? In:Proceedings of the 16th AMIC annual conference/1st WJEC media, education and development: The quest for new paradigms, Singapore, 25–28 June.
27.
LachmanRJLachmanLButterfieldEC (1979) Cognitive Psychology and Information Processing: An Introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
LeeRSH (1978) Credibility of newspaper and TV news. Journalism Quarterly55(2): 282–287.
29.
LeutnerDLeopoldCSumflethE (2009) Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior25(2): 284–289.
30.
LevinSRAndersonDR (1976) The development of attention. Journal of Communication26(2): 126–135.
31.
LinLAtkinsonRK (2011) Using animations and visual cueing to support learning of scientific concepts and processes. Computers & Education56(3): 650–658.
32.
LoWHChengBKL (2013) Fuelling the debate: Predictive relationships among personality characteristics, motives and effects of melodramatic animated news viewing. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies2(1): 135–160.
33.
LoWHChengBKL (2015) The use of melodramatic animation in news, presence and news credibility. Journalism Studies18(6): 787–805.
34.
LoweRK (2003) Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction13(2): 157–176.
35.
LullRBBushmanBJ (2015) Do sex and violence sell? A meta-analytic review of the effects of sexual and violent media and ad content on memory, attitudes, and buying intentions. Psychological Bulletin141(5): 1022–1048.
36.
MayerRE (2014) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2nd edn.New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
MayerREMorenoR (2002) Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review14(1): 87–99.
38.
MerktMSchwanS (2017) What you see is what you remember? Depictions of historical figures influence memory for historical facts. Learning and Instruction52: 112–121.
39.
MerktMWeigandSHeierA, et al. (2011) Learning with videos vs. learning with print: The role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction21(6): 687–704.
40.
MorenoRMayerRE (1999) Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction17(3): 215–248.
RieberLP (1991) Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology83(3): 318–328.
50.
SadoskiMPaivioA (2013) Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing, 2nd edn.New York: Routledge.
51.
ThompsonSVRidingRJ (1990) The effect of animated diagrams on the understanding of a mathematical demonstration in 11- to 14-year-old pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology60(1): 93–98.
52.
UmanathSButlerACMarshEJ (2012) Positive and negative effects of monitoring popular films for historical inaccuracies. Applied Cognitive Psychology26(4): 556–567.
53.
Van der MolenJHWKlijnME (2004) Recall of television versus print news: Retesting the semantic overlap hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media48(1): 89–107.
54.
Van der MolenJHWvan der VoortTHA (1997) Children’s recall of television and print news: A media comparison study. Journal of Educational Psychology89(1): 82–91.
55.
Van der MolenJHWvan der VoortTHA (1998) Children’s recall of the news: TV news stories compared with three print versions. Educational Technology Research and Development46(1): 39–52.
56.
Van der MolenJHWvan der VoortTHA (2000) The impact of television, print, and audio on children’s recall of the news: A study of three alternative explanations for the dual-coding hypothesis. Human Communication Research26(1): 3–26.
57.
WeibelDWissmathBGronerR (2008) How gender and age affect newscasters’ credibility – An investigation in Switzerland. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media52(3): 466–484.
58.
ZaragozaMSMitchellKJ (1996) Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories. Psychological Science7(5): 294–300.