Mainstream U.S. news media stand accused of bias against the forty-fifth president, Donald Trump. The relentlessness and intensity of these accusations over the course of Trump’s presidency are unusual and make for an opportunity to study perceptions of news bias. During the experiment reported here, participants (N = 315) were exposed to biased (pro- and anti-Trump) news stories that were attributed to either CNN, Breitbart, or remained unattributed to a news brand. After reading the stories, participants rated the stories for their relative slantedness in favor of, neutral, or against the president. Findings reveal that news users are sensitized to the president’s accusations of bias against CNN. For example, anti-Trump stories were rated as more slanted than pro-Trump stories when they were attributed to CNN. This was not the case when the same stories were attributed to Breitbart. Interestingly, unattributed biased news received the highest ratings for slantedness.
ArceneauxKevinJohnsonMartinMurphyChad. 2012. “Polarized Political Communication, Oppositional Media Hostility, and Selective Exposure.” The Journal of Politics74 (1): 174–86.10.1017/S002238161100123X
2.
ArendtFlorianNorthupTempleCamajLindita. 2019. “Selective Exposure and News Media Brands: Implicit and Explicit Attitudes as Predictors of News Choice.” Media Psychology22 (3): 526–43.10.1080/15213269.2017.1338963
3.
AriyantoAmarinaHornseyMatthew J.GalloisCindy. 2007. “Group Allegiances and Perceptions of Media Bias: Taking into Account Both the Perceiver and the Source.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations10 (2): 266–79.10.1177/1368430207074733
4.
ArpanLaura M.RaneyArthur A.2003. “An Experimental Investigation of News Source and the Hostile Media Effect.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly80 (2): 265–81.10.1177/107769900308000203
5.
BaumMatthew A.GussinPhil. 2008. “In the Eye of the Beholder: How Information Shortcuts Shape Individual Perceptions of Bias in the Media.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science3 (1): 1–31.10.1561/100.00007010
6.
BoxellLeviGentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2020. Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization” the National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26669.
BremsCaraTemmermanMartinaGrahamToddBroersmaMarcel. 2017. “Personal Branding on Twitter: How Employed and Freelance Journalists Stage Themselves on Social Media.” Digital Journalism5 (4): 443–59.10.1080/21670811.2016.1176534
ChiangC. F.KnightB.2011. “Media Bias and Influence: Evidence from Newspaper Endorsements.” The Review of Economic Studies78 (3): 795–820.10.1093/restud/rdq037
11.
CoeKevinTewksburyDavidBondBradley J.DrogosKristin L.PorterRobert W.YahnAshleyZhangYuanyuan. 2008. “Hostile News: Partisan Use and Perceptions of Cable News Programming.” Journal of Communication58 (2): 201–19.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00381.x
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2006. “Media Bias and Reputation.” Journal of Political Economy114 (2): 280–316.10.1086/499414
14.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.SinkinsonMichael. 2014. “Competition and Ideological Diversity: Historical Evidence from US Newspapers.” American Economic Review104 (10): 3073–3114.10.1257/aer.104.10.3073
15.
GrabeMaria E.BucyEric P.2009. Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
GrabeMaria E.KamhawiRashaYegiyanNarine. 2009. “Informing Citizens: How People with Different Levels of Education Process Television, Newspaper, and Web News.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media53 (1): 90–111.10.1080/08838150802643860
17.
GuntherAlbert C.ChristenCindy T.LiebhartJanice L.ChiaStella C.-H.2001. “Congenial Public, Contrary Press, and Biased Estimates of the Climate of Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly65 (3): 295–320.10.1086/322846
18.
GuntherAlbert C.McLaughlinBryanGotliebMelissa R.WiseDavid. 2017. “Who Says What to Whom: Content versus Source in the Hostile Media Effect.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research29 (3): 363–83.10.1093/ijpor/8.3.248
19.
HamiltonJames T.2004. All News that Fits to Sell. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
HyunKi D.SeoMihye. 2019. “The Effects of HMP and TPP on Political Participation in the Partisan Media Context.” Communication Research. Published electronically January 8. doi:10.1177/0093650218820229.
21.
IyengarShantoHahnKyu S.2009. “Red media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication59 (1): 19–39.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
22.
JonesJeffrey P.2012. “Fox News and the Performance of Ideology.” Cinema Journal51 (4): 178–85.10.1353/cj.2012.0073
23.
KalogeropoulosAntonisFletcherRichardNielsenRasmus K.2019. “News Brand Attribution in Distributed Environments: Do People Know Where They Get Their News?” New Media & Society21 (3): 583–601.10.1177/1461444818801313
24.
KayeBarbara K.JohnsonThomas J.2016. “Across the Great Divide: How Partisanship and Perceptions of Media Bias Influence Changes in Time Spent with Media.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media60 (4): 604–23.10.1080/08838151.2016.1234477
KimJooyoungBaekTae H.MartinHugh J.2010. “Dimensions of News Media Brand Personality.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly87 (1): 117–34.
27.
KimMihee. 2019. “The Role of Partisan Sources and Audiences’ Involvement in The Persuasive Press Inference.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research31 (2): 382–92.
Knobloch-WesterwickSilvia. 2012. “Selective Exposure and Reinforcement of Attitudes and Partisanship before a Presidential Election.” Journal of Communication62 (4): 628–42.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01651.x
LazerDavid M. J.BaumMatthew A.BenklerYochaiBerinskyAdam J.GreenhillKelly M.MenczerFilippoMetzgerMiriam J.NyhanBrendanPennycookGordonRothschildDavidSchudsonMichaelSlomanSteven A.SunsteinCass R.ThorsonEmily A.WattsDuncan J.ZittrainJonathan L.2018. “The Science of Fake News.” Science359 (6380): 1094–96.10.1126/science.aao2998
32.
LeeTien-Tsung. 2005. “The Liberal Media Myth Revisited: An Examination of Factors Influencing Perceptions of Media Bias.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49 (1): 43–64.10.1207/s15506878jobem4901_4
33.
LiuBingjieWeiLewen. 2019. “Machine Authorship In Situ: Effect of News Organization and News Genre on News Credibility.” Digital Journalism7 (5): 635–57.10.1080/21670811.2018.1510740
34.
MessingSolomonWestwoodSean J.2014. “Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media: Endorsements Trump Partisan Source Affiliation When Selecting News Online.” Communication Research41 (8): 1042–63.10.1177/0093650212466406
35.
Pew Research Center. 2014. “Political Polarization and Media Habits.” Pew Research Center, October21. http://pewrsr.ch/1vZ9MnM.
36.
Pew Research Center. 2018. “Partisans Remain Sharply Divided in Their Attitudes about the News Media.” Pew Research Center, September25. https://pewrsr.ch/2pqyCOQ.
37.
Pew Research Center. 2019a. “Americans Are Wary of the Role Social Media Sites Play in Delivering the News.” Pew Research Center, October2. https://pewrsr.ch/2ZVuECq.
38.
Pew Research Center. 2019b. “Many Americans Say Made-Up News Is a Critical Problem that Needs to Be Fixed.” Pew Research Center, June5. https://pewrsr.ch/2Xgk4At.
SjøvaagHelle. 2013. “Revenue and Branding Strategy in the Norwegian News Market.” Nordicom Review33 (1):53–66.10.2478/nor-2013-0004
43.
SmithGlen R.2010. “Politicians and the News Media: How Elite Attacks Influence Perceptions of Media Bias.” The International Journal of Press/Politics15 (3): 319–43.
44.
StroudNatalie J.LeeJae K.2013. “Perceptions of Cable News Credibility.” Mass Communication and Society16 (1): 67–88.10.1080/15205436.2011.646449
45.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–69.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
46.
TsfatiYariv. 2003. “Media Skepticism and Climate of Opinion Perception.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research15 (1): 65–82.10.1093/ijpor/15.1.65
47.
TullyMelissa.VragaEmily K.SmithsonAnne-Bennett. 2020. “News Media Literacy, Perceptions of Bias, and Interpretation of News.” Journalism21:209–26.10.1177/1464884918805262
48.
TurnerJoel. 2007. “The Messenger Overwhelming the Message: Ideological Cues and Perceptions of Bias in Television News.” Political Behavior29 (4): 441–64.10.1007/s11109-007-9031-z
49.
van DuynEmilyCollierJessica. 2019. “Priming and Fake News: The Effects of Elite Discourse on Evaluations of News Media.” Mass Communication and Society22 (1): 29–48.10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807
50.
WattsMark D.DomkeDavidShahDhavan V.FanDavid P.1999. “Elite Cues and Media Bias in Presidential Campaigns: Explaining Public Perceptions of a Liberal Press.” Communication Research26 (2): 144–75.10.1177/009365099026002003
51.
WinterStephanMetzgerMetzger J.FlanaginAndrew J.2016. “Selective Use of News Cues: A Multiple-Motive Perspective on Information Selection in Social Media Environments.” Journal of Communication66 (4): 669–93.10.1111/jcom.12241
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
