Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines the actions of readers as press critics and, therefore, as potentially powerful shapers of journalism’s cultural capital. An analysis of 2 years’ worth of online reader comments on the ombudsman columns of three national news organizations reveals readers’ support of – and even nostalgia for – mainstream journalism values such as objectivity, echoing earlier research suggesting the stability of the journalistic field in the face of challenges from new players such as bloggers. But commenters’ critiques of journalistic performance also employed social, and not only professional, values, representing a potential challenge to journalist autonomy.

Keywords

Field theory journalistic capital objectivity ombudsmen online comments press criticism transparency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alag

(2009) Collective Intelligence in Action. Greenwich, CT: Manning.

Allen

(2005) Democracy, Inc.: The Press and Law in the Corporate Rationalization of the Public Sphere. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Anderson

(2011) Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism 12(5): 550–566.

Baek

Wojcieszak

Delli Carpini

(2012) Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects? New Media & Society 14(3): 363–383.

Benson

(1999) Field theory in comparative context: A new paradigm for media studies. Theory and Society 28(3): 463–498.

Benson

Neveu

(2005) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Malden, MA: Polity.

Black

(1997) Mixed News: The Public/Civic/Communitarian Journalism Debate. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Boczkowski

Mitchelstein

(2013) The News Gap: When the Information Preferences of the Media and the Public Diverge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Bourdieu

(1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

10.

Bourdieu

(2005) The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In: Benson

Neveu

(eds) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Malden, MA: Polity, pp. 29–47.

11.

Carlson

(2009) Media criticism as competitive discourse: Defining reportage of the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication Inquiry 33(3): 258–277.

12.

Charmaz

(2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

13.

Coddington

(2013) Normalizing the hyperlink: How bloggers, professional journalists, and institutions shape linking values. Digital Journalism. Epub ahead of print 5 April. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2013.785813.

14.

Commission on Freedom of the Press (1947) A Free and Responsible Press: A General Report on Mass Communication: Newspapers, Radio, Motion Pictures, Magazines, and Books. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

15.

Demers

(1995) Autonomy, satisfaction high among corporate news staffs. Newspaper Research Journal 16(2): 91–111.

16.

Deuze

(2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism 6(4): 442–464.

17.

Gans

(1979) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Vintage Books.

18.

Glaser

Strauss

(1968) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

19.

Hanitzsch

(2007) Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a universal theory. Communication Theory 17(4): 367–385.

20.

Hayes

Singer

Ceppos

(2007) Shifting roles, enduring values: The credible journalist in a digital age. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22(4): 262–279.

21.

Hellmueller

Vos

Poepsel

(2013) Shifting journalistic capital? Transparency and objectivity in the 21st century. Journalism Studies 14(3): 287–304.

22.

Kapoor

Smith

(1979) The newspaper ombudsman – A progress report. Journalism Quarterly 56(3): 628–631.

23.

Kim

(2002) Gatekeeping international news: An attitudinal profile of U.S. television journalists. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 46(3): 431–453.

24.

Kovach

Rosenstiel

(2007) The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect, 1st edn. New York: Three Rivers Press.

25.

Lippmann

(1922) Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.

26.

Litt

(2012) Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56(3): 330–345.

27.

Lowrey

(2006) Mapping the journalism-blogging relationship. Journalism 7(4): 477–500.

28.

McCluskey

Hmielowski

(2012) Opinion expression during social conflict: Comparing online reader comments and letters to the editor. Journalism 13(3): 303–319.

29.

McManus

(1994) Market-Driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware? Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

30.

Napoli

(2003) Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace. New York: Columbia University Press.

31.

Robinson

(2010) Traditionalists vs. convergers: Textual privilege, boundary work, and the journalist – Audience relationship in the commenting policies of online news sites. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 16(1): 125–143.

32.

Rohlinger

(2007) American media and deliberative democratic processes. Sociological Theory 25(2): 122–148.

33.

Rosen

(1999) What Are Journalists for? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

34.

Rosenberry

(2010) Virtual community support for offline communities through online newspaper message forums. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 87(1): 154–169.

35.

Santana

(2011) Online readers’ comments represent new opinion pipeline. Newspaper Research Journal 32(3): 66–81.

36.

Shafer

(2013). Does anyone care about newspaper ombudsmen? Reuters, 4 March. Available at: http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2013/03/04/does-anyone-care-about-newspaper-ombudsmen/ (accessed 1 November 2013).

37.

Shoemaker

Vos

(2009) Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.

38.

Singer

(2007) Contested autonomy. Journalism Studies 8(1): 79–95.

39.

Singer

Domingo

Heinonen

. (2011) Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

40.

Sumpter

(2000) Daily newspaper editors’ audience construction routines: A case study. Critical Studies in Media Communication 17(3): 334–346.

41.

Tandoc

(2014) Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping. New Media & Society 16(4): 559–575.

42.

Van Dalen

Deuze

(2006) Readers’ advocates or newspapers’ ambassadors? European Journal of Communication 21(4): 457–475.

43.

Vos

Craft

Ashley

(2012) New media, old criticism: Bloggers’ press criticism and the journalistic field. Journalism 13(7): 848–866.

44.

Wahl-Jorgenson

(2002) The construction of the public in letters to the editor: Deliberative democracy and the idiom of insanity. Journalism 3(2): 183–204.

45.

Weaver

Beam

Brownlee

. (2007) The American Journalist in the 21st Century: U.S. News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

46.

Wyatt

(2007) Critical Conversations: A Theory of Press Criticism. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

47.

Zelizer

(1993) Journalists as interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 10(3): 219–237.

48.

Brisbane

(2011a) An American in Pakistan. The New York Times, 26 February. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/opinion/27pubed.html

49.

Brisbane

(2011b) Hanging on as the boundaries shift. The New York Times, 8 January. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/opinion/09pubed.html

50.

Brisbane

(2011c) Name withheld, but not his identity. The New York Times, 17 December. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/18/opinion/sunday/name-withheld-but-not-his-identity.html

51.

Brisbane

(2011d) The secrets of government killing. The New York Times, 9 October. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/opinion/sunday/the-secrets-of-government-killing.html

52.

Brisbane

(2011e) Who is Occupy Wall Street? The New York Times, 12 November. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/13/opinion/sunday/who-is-occupy-wall-street.html

53.

Brisbane

(2012a) Should the Times be a truth vigilante? The New York Times, 12 January. Available at: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/12/should-the-times-be-a-truth-vigilante/

54.

Brisbane

(2012b) Lolo Jones article is too harsh. The New York Times, 9 August. Available at: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/09/lolo-jones-article-is-too-harsh/

55.

Brisbane

(2012c) Pre-publication disclosure of Dowd column: A breach of two boundaries. The New York Times, 29 August. Available at: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/29/pre-publication-disclosure-of-dowd-column-a-breach-of-two-boundaries/

56.

Brisbane

(2012d) The Times’s agenda project for campaign: Some readers vote yes, some scoff. The New York Times, 1 August. Available at: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/01/the-timess-agenda-project-for-campaign-some-readers-vote-yes-some-scoff/

57.

Burgess

(2012) A note to readers. The New York Times, 30 August. Available at: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/30/public-editor-transition/

58.

Pexton

(2011a) A journalist’s No. 1 ‘platform-neutral’ duty. The Washington Post, 29 April. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opininos/a-journalists-no-1-platform-neutral-duty/2011/04/29/AFi1KyGF_story.html

59.

Pexton

(2011b) At The Post, reporters get socialized to social media. The Washington Post, 1 July. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/at-the-post-reporters-get-socialized-to-social-media/2011/07/01/AG3I0CuH_story.html

60.

Pexton

(2011c) Did a Social Security story go too far? The Washington Post, 4 November. Available at: http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-11-04/opinions/35282467_1_social-security-fund-baby-boomer-retirees

61.

Pexton

(2011d) Post’s reporting on SEAL Team 6 provokes cries of ‘treason’. The Washington Post, 20 May. Available at: http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-05-20/opinions/35263242_1_navy-seal-team-reporter-shot-bin

62.

Pexton

(2011e) The damage done by Post reporter Sari Horwitz’s plagiarism. The Washington Post, 18 March. Available at: http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-03-18/opinions/35261321_1_plagiarism-post-executive-editor-post-reporter

63.

Pexton

(2011f) Was George Will influenced by his wife’s work for the GOP? The Washington Post, 18 November. Available at: http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-11-18/opinions/35282135_1_1michele-bachmann-bachmann-and-perry-gop-candidates

64.

Pexton

(2011g) Why did The Post deport Jose Antonio Vargas’s story? The Washington Post, 24 June. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-did-the-post-deport-jose-antonio-vargass-story/2011/06/24/AGdXKdjH_story.html

65.

Pexton

(2012a) Outsourcing customer service at The Post. The Washington Post, 11 October. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/omblog/post/outsourcing-customer-service-at-the-post/2012/10/11/14485f22-13ee-11e2-bf18-a8a596df4bee_blog.html

66.

Pexton

(2012b) Post roast: Motley headlines. The Washington Post, 10 January. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/omblog/post/post-roast-motley-headlines/2012/01/10/gIQAAzK7oP_blog.html

67.

Pexton

(2012c) Reader Meter: Who really invented e-mail? The Washington Post, 24 February. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/omblog/post/reader-meter-who-really-invented-e-mail/2012/02/24/gIQAHZugYR_blog.html

68.

Schumacher-Matos

(2011a) Linguistics and fiction in a country called Burma. NPR, 1 December. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2011/11/30/142968821/linguistics-and-fiction-in-a-country-called-burma

69.

Schumacher-Matos

(2011b) Simeone and ‘World of Opera’: Not a news issue. NPR, 20 October. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2011/10/20/141568371/ simeone-world-of-opera-not-a-news-issue

70.

Schumacher-Matos

(2011c) Some thoughtful responses to ‘Murdoch and liberal bias at NPR’. NPR, 21 October. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2011/10/21/141599418/some-thoughtful-responses-to-murdoch-and-liberal-bias-at-npr

71.

Schumacher-Matos

(2012a) An impossible standard: When NPR covers its sponsors. NPR, 16 March. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2012/03/16/148778815/an-impossible-standard-when-npr-covers-its-sponsors

72.

Schumacher-Matos

(2012b) Bias and balance of Republican and Democratic voices on the ‘fiscal cliff’. NPR, 12 December. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2012/12/12/167046937/bias-and-balance-of-republican-and-democratic-voices-on-air-about-the-fiscal-cli

73.

Schumacher-Matos

(2012c) Black bands, black football players and Frank Deford. NPR, 4 January. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2012/01/03/144615309/black-bands-black-football-players-and-frank-deford

74.

Schumacher-Matos

(2012d) Minority hiring and the talent pool: A good story. NPR, 11 April. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2012/04/11/150432660/minority-hiring-and-the-talent-pool-a-good-story

75.

Schumacher-Matos

(2012e) Open Forum. NPR, 25 April. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2012/04/25/151358395/open-forum

76.

Schumacher-Matos

(2012f) The contraception mandate: Where are the women? NPR, 17 February. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2012/02/17/147060538/the-contraception-mandate-where-are-the-women

77.

Shepard

(2011a) A grizzly bear story with too many leaps and not enough skepticism. NPR, 10 May. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2011/05/11/135988273/a-grizzly-bear-story-with-too-many-leaps-and-not-enough-skepticism

78.

Shepard

(2011b) NPR’s costly mistake. NPR, 7 January. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2011/01/07/132718863/nprs-costly-mistake

79.

Shepard

(2011c) Wait wait: In this case, please do not tell me. NPR, 28 March. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2011/03/24/134826720/wait-wait-in-this-case-please-do-not-tell-me

80.

Sullivan

(2012a) Is ‘illegal immigrant’ the right description? The New York Times, 24 September. Available at: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/is-illegal-immigrant-the-right-description/

81.

Sullivan

(2012b) Photo caption should have been better. But ‘Orwellian’? No. The New York Times, 27 November. Available at: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/27/photo-caption-should-have-been-better-but-orwellian-no/

82.

Sullivan

(2012c) The Times should have a reporter at the Bradley Manning hearing. The New York Times, 5 December. Available at: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/the-times-should-have-a-reporter-at-the-bradley-manning-hearing/

83.

Sullivan

(2012d) Why wasn’t Libya hearing on page A1 of The Times? The New York Times, 11 October. Available at: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/why-wasnt-libya-hearing-on-page-a1-of-the-times/

Reader comments as press criticism: Implications for the journalistic field

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References