Pathways to news commenting and the removal of the comment system on news websites

Abstract

Many major news websites have recently opted to remove comment sections that appear beneath their online news articles. However, researchers know very little about how news audiences feel about the silencing of this interactive feature. Our study analyzes data from adult Internet users in the United States in an online survey to provide empirical evidence regarding motivations underlying different engagement in news comment systems and attitudes of news readers toward comment system removal. Overall, findings suggest that compared to non-users, people who read or post comments are more likely to oppose removal. Moreover, comments removal attitude is dependent on motives of using news comment sections. Information-seeking motives are negatively related to the support for comments removal among lurkers, whereas affective socialization motives are positive predictors of comment system removal among commenters.

Keywords

Motives news comment system online comments uses and gratifications

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Brossard

Scheufele

, et al. (2014) The ‘nasty effect’: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(3): 373–387.

Aschwanden

(2016) We asked 8,500 internet commenters why they do what they do. FiveThirtyEight. Available at: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/we-asked-8500-internet-commenters-why-they-do-what-they-do/

Barnes

(2014) The ‘ecology of participation’: A study of audience engagement on alternative journalism websites. Digital Journalism 2(4): 542–557.

Barnes

(2016) The ecology of participation. In: Witschge

Anderson

Domingo

, et al. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. London: SAGE, pp. 179–191.

Boczkowski

Mitchelstein

(2012) How users take advantage of different forms of interactivity on online news sites: Clicking, e-mailing, and commenting. Human Communication Research 38: 1–22.

Borah

(2014) Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research 41: 809–827.

Brodeur

(2015) Sick of comment sections? Say no more. The Boston Globe. Available at: https://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/2015/10/12/sick-comment-sections-say-more/zPUQnI1xDskcanoBH5rP2H/story.html

Chung

(2008) Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(3): 658–679.

Chung

Yoo

(2008) Audience motivations for using interactive features: Distinguishing use of different types of interactivity on an online newspaper. Mass Communication and Society 11(4): 375–397.

10.

Coe

Kenski

Rains

(2014) Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication 64: 658–679.

11.

Diakopoulos

Naaman

(2011) Towards quality discourse in online news comments. In: Hinds

Tang

Wang

, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 133–142.

12.

Eighmey

(1997) Profiling user responses to commercial Web sites. Journal of Advertising Research 37: 59–69.

13.

Ellis

(2015) What happened after 7 news sites got rid of reader comments? Nieman Lab. Available at: http://www.niemanlab.org/2015/09/what-happened-after-7-news-sites-got-rid-of-reader-comments/

14.

Fisher

(1978) Perspectives on Human Communication. New York: Macmillan.

15.

Gross

(2014) Online comments are being phased out. CNN. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/21/tech/web/online-comment-sections/

16.

Yang

, et al. (2018) Decline in news content engagement or news medium engagement? A longitudinal analysis of news engagement since the rise of social and mobile media 2009–2012. Journalism 19(5): 718–739.

17.

Hsueh

Yogeeswaran

Malinen

(2015) ‘Leave your comment below’: Can biased online comments influence our own prejudicial attitudes and behaviors. Human Communication Research 41: 557–576.

18.

Katz

Blumler

Gurevitch

(1974) Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In: Blumler

Katz

(eds) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 19–32.

19.

Klapper

(1963) Mass communication research: An old road resurveyed. Public Opinion Quarterly 27: 515–527.

20.

Korgaonkar

Wolin

(1999) A multivariate analysis of Web usage. Journal of Advertising Research 39: 53–68.

21.

Kovach

Rosenstiel

(2001) The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Three Rivers Press.

22.

Labarre

(2013) Why we’re shutting off our comments. Popular Science. Available at: http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-09/why-were-shutting-our-comments

23.

Larsson

(2011) Interactive to me – Interactive to you? A study of use and appreciation of interactivity on Swedish newspaper websites. New Media & Society 13(7): 1180–1197.

24.

Leung

(2009) User-generated content on the internet: An examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society 11(8): 1327–1347.

25.

Lönnqvist

J-E

Itkonen

JVA

(2016) Homogeneity of personal values and personality traits in Facebook social networks. Journal of Research in Personality 60: 24–35.

26.

Massey

Levy

(1999) Interactivity, online journalism, and English language Web newspapers in Asia. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 76(1): 138–151.

27.

Mersery

Malthouse

Calder

(2010) Engagement with online media. Journal of Media Business Studies 7(2): 39–56.

28.

Mutz

Reeves

(2005) The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review 99(1): 1–15.

29.

Nielson

(2014) Coproduction or cohabitation: Are anonymous online comments on newspaper websites shaping news content? New Media & Society 16(3): 470–487.

30.

Papacharissi

(2004) Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society 6(2): 259–283.

31.

Papacharissi

Rubin

(2000) Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44(2): 175–196.

32.

Prochazka

Weber

Schweiger

(2018) Effects of civility and reasoning in user comments on perceived journalistic quality. Journalism Studies 1: 62–78.

33.

Reader

(2012) Free press vs. free speech? The rhetoric of ‘civility’ in regard to anonymous online comments. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89(3): 495–513.

34.

Reader

(2015) Audience Feedback in the News Media. New York: Routledge.

35.

Reich

(2011) User comments: The transformation of participatory space. In: Singer

(ed.) Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 96–117.

36.

Rowe

(2015) Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society 18(2): 121–138.

37.

Rubin

(2009) Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In: Bryant

Oliver

(eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 165–184.

38.

Ruggiero

(2000) Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society 3(1): 3–37.

39.

Ruiz

Domingo

Mico

́JL

, et al. (2011) Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics 22: 463–487.

40.

Sobeiraj

Berry

(2011) From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication 28(1): 19–41.

41.

Springer

Engelmann

Pfaffinger

(2015) User comments: Motives and inhibitors to write and read. Information, Communication & Society 18(7): 798–815.

42.

Stromer-Galley

(2002) New voices in the political sphere: A comparative analysis of interpersonal and online political talk. Javnost-The Public 9: 23–42.

43.

Stroud

Van Dyun

Peacock

(2016) Survey of commenters and comment readers. Available at: https://mediaengagement.org/research/survey-of-commenters-and-comment-readers/

44.

Tenenboim

Cohen

(2015) What prompts users to click and comment: A longitudinal study of online news. Journalism 16: 198–217.

45.

Tewksbury

Althaus

(2000) An examination of motivations for using the World Wide Web. Communication Research Reports 17(2): 127–138.

46.

Yoo

(2011) Modeling audience interactivity as the gratification-seeking process in online newspapers. Communication Theory 21(1): 67–89.

47.

Ziegele

Breiner

Quiring

(2014) What creates interactivity in online news discussions?: An exploratory analysis of discussion factors in user comments on mass media websites. Journal of Communication 64: 1111–1138.

48.

Ziegele

Weber

Quiring

, et al. (2017) The dynamics of online news discussions: Effects of news articles and reader comments on users’ involvement, willingness to participate, and the civility of their contributions. Information, Communication & Society 21: 1419–1435.