News outlets serve democratic norms by providing a wide range of viewpoints, including opinions from the public. This study examined opinion expression in online reader posts and letters to the editor in a community facing social conflict. Analysis of opinion expression about the Jena Six showed more balance in both the range and tone of opinions from online reader comments than reader letters. Online posts more often challenged community institutions than did letters. Ability to post anonymous comments, the absence of media gatekeepers and a younger audience are potential reasons why online reader comments differed from reader letters.
AllenL (2007) What about the victim?Alexandria Town Talk, 06C, 21September.
3.
BenhabibS (1996) Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In: BenhabibS (ed.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 67–94.
4.
BerkowitzD (1992) Non-routine news and newswork: Exploring a what-a-story. Journal of Communication42(1): 82–94.
5.
BuellEH (1975) Eccentrics or gladiators? People who write about politics in letters-to-the-editor. Social Science Quarterly56(3): 440–449.
6.
CharneyE (1998) Political liberalism, deliberative democracy, and the public sphere. The American Political Science Review92(1): 97–110.
7.
ChungDS (2008) Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13: 658–679.
8.
CohenJ (1996) Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In: BenhabibS (ed.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 95–119.
9.
DavisHRarickG (1964) Functions of editorials and letters to the editor. Journalism Quarterly41: 108–109.
10.
DeardenP (1986) Letters to the editor, editorials and agenda-setting: A case study of newspaper response to an environmental problem. Journal of Environmental Management22: 39–54.
11.
DeweyJ (1927) The Public and its Problems. New York: Holt-Rhinehart & Winston.
12.
DomingoDHeinonenA (2008) Weblogs and journalism: A typology to explore the blurring boundaries. Nordicom Review29(1): 3–15.
13.
DomingoDQuandtTHeinonenAPaulussenSSingerJBVujnovicM (2008) Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond. Journalism Practice2(3): 326–342.
14.
Editor & Publisher (2006) International Yearbook. New York: Editor & Publisher Co.
15.
FarrellHDreznerDW (2008) The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice134(1/2): 15–30.
16.
ForsytheSA (1950) An exploratory study of letters to the editor and their contributors. Public Opinion Quarterly14: 143–144.
17.
GimmlerA (2001) Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet. Philosophy & Social Criticism27(4): 21–39.
18.
GreyDLBrownTR (1970) Letters to the editor: Hazy reflections of public opinion. Journalism Quarterly47(3): 450–456, 471.
19.
GriffinRJDunwoodyS (1995) Impacts of information subsidies and community structure on local press coverage of environmental contamination. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly72(2): 271–284.
20.
HabermasJ (1999[1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
HartJA (1970) Views on the News: The Developing Editorial Syndrome, 1500–1800. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
22.
HayesAFKrippendorffK (2007) Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures1: 77–89.
23.
HermidaAThurmanN (2008) A clash of cultures. Journalism Practice2(3): 343–356.
24.
HillDB (1981) Letter opinion on ERA: A test of the newspaper bias hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly45(2): 384–392.
25.
HyndsECMartinCM (1979) How non-daily editors describe status and function of editorial pages. Journalism Quarterly56(2): 318–323.
KapoorS (1995) Most papers receive more letters. The Masthead47(2): 18–21.
28.
LombardMSnyder-DuchJCampanella BrackenC (2002) Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research28(4): 587–604.
29.
McDevittMKiousisSWahl-JorgensenK (2003) Spiral of moderation: Opinion expression in computer-mediated discussion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research15(4): 454–470.
30.
MeiklejohnA (1960) Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of the People. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
31.
MerazS (2007) Analyzing political conversation on the Howard Dean candidate blog. In: TremayneM (ed.) Blogging, Citizenship and the Future of Media. New York: Routledge, 59–82.
32.
MillJS (1999[1859]) On Liberty. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
33.
MiltonJ (1909[1644]) Areopagitica: A Speech of Mr. John Milton for the Liberty of Unlicensed Printing to the Parliament of England. New York: Collier.
34.
NielsenC (2010) Community conversation or ‘the new bathroom wall’? Anonymous online comments and the journalist’s role. Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Newspaper Division, Denver, CO, 4 August.
PritchardDBerkowitzD (1991) How readers’ letters may influence editors and news emphasis: A content analysis of 10 newspapers, 1948–1978. Journalism Quarterly68(3): 388–395.
37.
ReaderB (2005) An ethical ‘blind spot’: Problems of anonymous letters to the editor. Journal of Mass Media Ethics20(1): 62–76.
38.
ReaderBStempelGHIIIDanielDK (2004) Age, wealth and education predict letters to the editor. Newspaper Research Journal25(4): 55–66.
39.
RenfroPC (1979) Bias in selection of letters to the editor. Journalism Quarterly56: 822–826.
40.
RobinsonS (2010) Traditionalists vs. convergers: Textual privilege, boundary work, and the journalist–audience relationship in the commenting policies of online news sites. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies16(1): 125–143.
41.
RosaR (2007) Don’t stir up old hatr(eds). Alexandria Town Talk, 03D, 21October.
42.
SantanaA (2010) Conversation or cacophony: Newspapers reporters’ attitudes toward online reader comments. Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Newspaper Division, Denver, CO, 4 August.
43.
ScholtzA (2007) Anonymous web posts should be curtailed. Quill95(6): 39.
44.
SigelmanLWalkoszBJ (1992) Letters to the editor as a public opinion thermometer: The Martin Luther King holiday vote in Arizona. Social Science Quarterly73: 938–946.
45.
SingletaryM (1976) How public perceived letters to the editor. Journalism Quarterly53(3): 535–537.
46.
StevensonN (1995) Understanding Media Cultures: Social Theory and Mass Communication. London: SAGE.
TichenorPJDonohueGAOlienCN (1980) Community Conflict and the Press. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
49.
Wahl-JorgensenK (2001) Letters to the editor as a forum for public deliberation: Modes of publicity and democratic debate. Critical Studies in Mass Communication18(3): 303–320.
50.
Wahl-JorgensenK (2007) Journalists and the Public: Newsroom Culture, Letters to the Editor, and Democracy. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
51.
WardleCWilliamsAWahl-JorgensenK (2009) ugc@thebbc: A production study examining the ways in which audience material is used at the BBC. Presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL, 20 May.
52.
WolfsfeldGSheaferT (2006) Competing actors and the construction of political news: The contest over waves in Israel. Political Communication23: 333–354.
53.
XenosM (2008) New mediated deliberation: Blog and press coverage of the Alito nomination. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13: 485–503.
