The aim of this work is the development of a novel framework for structural optimization using bio-inspired remodelling algorithm adapted to additive manufacturing. The fact that polylactic acid (PLA, E = 3145 MPa (Young’s modulus) according to the supplier for parts obtained by injection) shows a similar parameterized behavior with ductile metals, in the sense that both materials are characterized by a bi-linear elastic-plastic law, allows to simulate and prototype parts to be further constructed in ductile metals at a lower cost and then be produced with more expensive fabrication processes. Moreover, cellular materials allow for a significant weight reduction and therefore reduction of production costs. Structural optimization algorithms based on biological phenomena were used to determine the density distribution of the infill density of the specimens. Several simple structures were submitted to distinct complex load cases and analyzed using the mentioned optimization algorithms combined with the finite element method and a meshless method. The surface was divided according to similar density and then converted to stereolitography files and infilled with the gyroid structure at the desired density determined before, using open-source slicing software. Smoothing functions were used to smooth the density field obtained with the remodeling algorithms. The samples were printed with fused filament fabrication technology and submitted to mechanical flexural tests similar to the ones analyzed analytically, namely three- and four-point bending tests. Thus, the factors of analysis were the smoothing parameter and the remodeling method, and the responses evaluated were stiffness, specific stiffness, maximum force, and mass. The experimental results correlated (obtaining accuracy of 35% for the three-point bending load case and 5% for the four-point bending load case) to the numerical results in terms of flexural stiffness and it was found that the complexity of the load case is relevant for the efficiency of the functional gradient. The fused filament fabrication process is still not accurate enough to be able to experimentally compare the results based of finite element method and meshless method analyses.
SchaedlerTACarterWB.Architected cellular materials. Annu Rev Mater Res2016;
46: 187–210.
2.
SchoenAH.Infinite periodic minimal surfaces without self-intersections.
Washington DC:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1970.
3.
AbueiddaDWElhebearyMShiangCS (Andrew), et al.
Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric gyroid cellular structures: experimental and finite element study. Mater Des2019;
165: 107597.
4.
AbueiddaDWBakirMAl-RubRKA, et al.
Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric cellular materials with triply periodic minimal surface architectures. Mater Des2017;
122: 255–267.
5.
MaskeryIAboulkhairNTAremuAO, et al.
Compressive failure modes and energy absorption in additively manufactured double gyroid lattices. Addit Manuf2017;
16: 24–29.
6.
MaSTangQFengQ, et al.
Mechanical behaviours and mass transport properties of bone-mimicking scaffolds consisted of gyroid structures manufactured using selective laser melting.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019;
93: 158–169.
7.
du PlessisARazaviSMJBertoF.The effects of microporosity in struts of gyroid lattice structures produced by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Des2020;
194: 108899.
FengJFuJLinZ, et al. A review of the design methods of complex topology structures for 3D printing. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art2018;
1: 1–16.
11.
Al-ketanOAl-rubRKA.Multifunctional mechanical metamaterials based on triply periodic minimal surface lattices. 2019;
1900524: 1–39.
12.
LiuFMaoZZhangP, et al.
Functionally graded porous scaffolds in multiple patterns: new design method, physical and mechanical properties. Mater Des2018;
160: 849–860.
13.
LiDLiaoWDaiN, et al.
Optimal design and modeling of gyroid-based functionally graded cellular structures for additive manufacturing. CAD Comput Aided Des2018;
104: 87–99.
14.
LiDDaiNJiangX, et al.
Interior structural optimization based on the density-variable shape modeling of 3D printed objects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2016;
83: 1627–1635.
15.
TangYKurtzAZhaoYF.Bidirectional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO) based design method for lattice structure to be fabricated by additive manufacturing. CAD Comput Aided Des2015;
69: 91–101.
16.
LiGYaoY. Manufacturable Gradient-Variable Cellular Structures Design. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/692/1/012010.
17.
YooD-J.Computer-aided porous scaffold design for tissue engineering using triply periodic minimal surfaces. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2011;
12: 61–71.
18.
WangCGuXZhuJ, et al.
Concurrent design of hierarchical structures with three-dimensional parameterized lattice microstructures for additive manufacturing. Struct Multidiscip Optim2020;
61: 869–894.
19.
WuJWangCCLZhangX, et al.
Self-supporting rhombic infill structures for additive manufacturing. CAD Comput Aided Des2016;
80: 32–42.
LuLSharfAZhaoH, et al.
Build-to-last: strength to weight 3D printed objects. ACM Trans Graph2014;
33: 1–10.
22.
PanesarAAbdiMHickmanD, et al.
Strategies for functionally graded lattice structures derived using topology optimisation for Additive Manufacturing. Addit Manuf2018;
19: 81–94.
23.
ZhangPTomanJYuY, et al. Efficient design-optimization of variable-density hexagonal cellular structure by additive manufacturing: theory and validation. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME2015;
137: 41–45.
24.
MaskeryISturmLAremuAO, et al.
Insights into the mechanical properties of several triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures made by polymer additive manufacturing. Polymer (Guildf)2018;
152: 62–71.
25.
AndersonC. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2014.
26.
GaoWZhangYRamanujanD, et al.
The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. CAD Comput Aided Des2015;
69: 65–89.
27.
SinghSSinghGPrakashC, et al.
Current status and future directions of fused filament fabrication. J Manuf Process2020;
55: 288–306.
28.
ReddyJN.An introduction to the finite element method. 3rd ed.New York:
McGraw-Hill Education (ISE Editions).
29.
Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL and Zhu JZ. The finite element method: Its basis and fundamentals. 6th ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2005.
30.
BelinhaJ.Meshless methods in biomechanics – bone tissue remodelling analysis.
Porto, Portugal:
Springer, 2014.
31.
BelytschkoTLuYYGuL.Element-free Galerkin methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng1994;
37: 229–256.
32.
LiuWKJunSZhangYF.Reproducing kernel particle methods. Int J Numer Methods fluids1995;
20: 1081–1106.
33.
AtluriSNZhuT.A new Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach in computational mechanics. Comput Mech1998;
22: 117–127.
34.
WangJGLiuGR.A point interpolation meshless method based on radial basis functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng2002;
54: 1623–1648.
35.
NguyenVPRabczukTBordasS, et al.
Meshless methods: a review and computer implementation aspects. Math Comput Simul2008;
79: 763–813.
36.
VoronoiG.Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques.J Für Die Reine Angew Math1908;
134: 198–287.
37.
DinisLMJSNatal JorgeRMBelinhaJ.Analysis of 3D solids using the natural neighbour radial point interpolation method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2007;
196: 2009–2028.
38.
DinisLMJSNatal JorgeRMBelinhaJ.Analysis of plates and laminates using the natural neighbour radial point interpolation method. Eng Anal Bound Elem2008;
32: 267–279.
39.
MoreiraSBelinhaJDinisL, et al.
Análise de vigas laminadas utilizando o natural neighbour radial point interpolation method.Rev Int Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo Diseño Ing2014;
30: 108–120.
40.
BelinhaJDinisLMJS and
Natal Jorge RM. The natural radial element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng2013;
93: 1286–1313.
41.
BelinhaJDinisLMJSJorgeRMN.Composite laminated plate analysis using the natural radial element method. Compos Struct2013;
103: 50–67.
42.
BelinhaJDinisLMJSNatal JorgeRM.Analysis of thick plates by the natural radial element method. Int J Mech Sci2013;
76: 33–48.
43.
LiuG-RGuY-T.An introduction to meshfree methods and their programming.
New York:
Springer Science & Business Media, 2005.
44.
DuanY.A note on the meshless method using radial basis functions. Comput Math with Appl2008;
55: 66–75.
YangXYXieYMStevenGP, et al.
Bidirectional evolutionary method for stiffness optimization. AIAA J1999;
37: 1483–1488.
47.
FyhrieDPCarterDR.A unifying principle relating stress to trabecular bone morphology.J Orthop Res1986;
4: 304–317.
48.
LotzJCGerhartTNHayesWC.Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. J Biomech1991;
24: 317–329.
49.
Silva CMM da.3D printing of gyroid structures for superior structural behaviour.
Porto, Portugal:
Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, 2019.
ChuSGaoLXiaoM, et al. Multiscale topology optimization for coated structures with multifarious-microstructural infill. Struct Multidiscip Optim. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-019-02428-y.
55.
Di CesareNDomaszewskiM.A new hybrid topology optimization method based on I-PR-PSO and ESO. Application to continuum structural mechanics. Comput Struct2019;
212: 311–326.
56.
GaynorATGuestJKMoenCD.Reinforced concrete force visualization and design using bilinear truss-continuum topology optimization. J Struct Eng (United States)2013;
139: 607–618.
57.
JewettJLCarstensenJV.Experimental investigation of strut-and-tie layouts in deep RC beams designed with hybrid bi-linear topology optimization. Eng Struct2019;
197: 109322.
58.
WuJClausenASigmundO.Minimum compliance topology optimization of shell–infill composites for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2017;
326: 358–375.
59.
SokółT.A 99 line code for discretized Michell truss optimization written in Mathematica. Struct Multidiscip Optim2011;
43: 181–190.
60.
YoshidaS. Michell truss : shape optimization vs. analytical solution. In: Conference: 2014 VR&D users conference, Monterey, CA, USA, 2014.
61.
PeyroteoMBelinhaJDinisL, et al. The mechanologic bone tissue remodeling analysis: a comparison between mesh-depending and meshless methods. In: Cerrolaza M, Shefelbine SJ and Garzón-Alvarado D (eds), Numerical methods and advanced simulation in biomechanics and biological processes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 303–323.
