Multi-objective optimization of process parameters involved in micro-finishing of Al/SiC MMCs by abrasive flow machining process

Abstract

It is hard to finish small slots in composite materials which have wide applications nowadays in aerospace, automobile and medical. Abrasive flow machining is a process that is suitable for such type of operations. In this paper, by using abrasive flow machining, investigation of SiC Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) with aluminum as base material has been done. Material removal rate and change in surface roughness (ΔRa) are taken as response parameters. Response surface methodology has been applied to find out the effect of input parameters like fluid pressure, percentage of oil in media, grit size, concentration of abrasives, workpiece material and number of cycles on response parameters. Box–Behnken design has been preferred. Response parameters have been optimized using the desirability approach in response surface methodology. The significance of different parameters is identified using analysis of variance. An optimum combination of parameters is designed for the process. Furthermore, specimens were examined and analyzed using scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction techniques.

Keywords

Response surface methodology desirability approach abrasive flow machining Al/SiC

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jain

. Micromanufacturing processes, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2012, pp. 184.

Jain

Dixit

. Modeling of material removal and surface roughness in abrasive flow machining process. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 1999; 39: 1903–1923.

Jain

Adsul

. Experimental investigations into abrasive flow machining (AFM). Int J Mach Tool Manuf 2000; 40: 1003–1021.

Gorana

Jain

Lal

. Experimental investigation into cutting forces and active grain density during abrasive flow machining. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 2004; 44: 201–211.

Howard

Cheng

. An integrated systematic investigation of the process variables on surface generation in abrasive flow machining of titanium alloy 6Al4V. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2014; 228: 1419–1431.

Wang

Weng

. Developing the polymer abrasive gels in AFM processes. J Mater Process Tech 2007; 192–193: 486–490.

Singh

Shan

. Development of magneto abrasive flow machining process. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 2002; 42: 953–959.

Baron Yu

Park

. Micro deburring for precision parts using magnetic abrasive finishing method. J Mater Process Tech 2007; 187–188: 19–25.

Wani

Yadava

Khatri

. Simulation for the prediction of surface roughness in magnetic abrasive flow finishing (MAFF). J Mater Process Tech 2007; 190: 282–290.

10.

Sadiq

Shunmugam

. A novel method to improve finish on non-magnetic surfaces in magneto-rheological abrasive honing process. Tribol Int 2010; 43: 1122–1126.

11.

Mamilla

Jain

Ramkumar

. Rotational abrasive flow finishing (R-AFF) process and its effects on finished surface topography. Inl J Mach Tool Manuf 2010; 50: 637–650.

12.

Judal

Yadava

Pathak

. Experimental investigation of vibration assisted cylindrical–magnetic abrasive finishing of aluminum workpiece. Mater Manuf Process 2013; 28: 1196–1202.

13.

Sankar

Jain

Ramkumar

. Rheological characterization of styrene-butadiene based medium and its finishing performance using rotational abrasive flow finishing process. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 2012; 51: 947–957.

14.

Sankar

Ramkumar

Jain

. Experimental investigation and mechanism of material removal in nano finishing of MMCs using abrasive flow finishing (AFF) process. Wear 2009; 266: 683–698.

15.

Tzeng

Yan

Hsu

et al.

Self-modulating abrasive medium and its application to abrasive flow machining for finishing micro channel surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2007; 32: 1163–1169.

16.

Kumar

Choudhary

Shankar

. Experimental and Morphological investigations in to electrical discharge surface grinding (EDSG) of 6061Al/Al₂O_3p 10% composite by composite tool electrode. J Mater Eng Perform 2014; 23: 1489–1497.

17.

Mulik

Pandey

. Experimental investigations and modeling of finishing force and torque in ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing. J Manuf Sci Eng 2012; 134: 051008 (1–12).

18.

Bhardwaj

Kumar

Singh

. Surface roughness (R_a) prediction model for turning of AISI 1019 steel using response surface methodology and Box–Cox transformation. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2014; 228: 223–232.

19.

Jain

. Optimum selection of machining conditions in abrasive flow machining using neural network. J Mater Process Tech 2000; 108: 62–67.

20.

Karagiannis S, Stavropoulos P, Ziogas C, et al. Prediction of surface roughness magnitude in computer numerical controlled end milling processes using neural networks, by considering a set of influence parameters: an aluminium alloy 5083 case study. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture. Epub ahead of print 4 September 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0954405413498582.

21.

Fletcher

Hull

Mackie

et al.

Computer modelling of the abrasive flow machining process. In: Meguid

(ed). Surface engineering, Springer Science, 1990, pp. 592–601. .

22.

Kumar A, Kumar V, and Kumar J. Investigation of machining parameters and surface integrity in wire electric discharge machining of pure titanium. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2013;227 (7): 972-992.

23.

Hascalik

Caydas

. A comparative study of surface integrity of Ti–6Al–4V alloy machined by EDM and AECG. J Mater Process Tech 2007; 190: 173–180.