This article offers a re-examination of perspective-taking skills in autism, based on the conversation analytic notions of recipient design and intersubjectivity. Perspective-taking is here conceptualised as an interactional achievement; an interpersonal, social process that builds shared understandings through sequential tradjectories of talk. Micro-analyses of naturally occurring interactions between adults with autism and neurotypical carers demonstrate autistic turns that are not designed with a sensitivity to recipients’ displayed needs in interaction, leading to breakdowns of intersubjectivity. Four types of so-called neurodivergent recipient design are presented: (1) references that do not facilitate recipient recognition; (2) stereotypical ‘nonsense’ talk that does not facilitate the recipient’s action ascription; (3) non-repaired misunderstandings; and (4) perseverative storytellings that are pursued despite the recipient’s display of disinterest. The perspective-taking can be said to be mutually challenged in these interactions, as shared understandings are not achieved. Such interactional approach to perspective-taking offers ecologically valid insights into the problems that are observable in natural interactions between autistic and neurotypical people, and future quantitative research in the autistic intersubjectivity is suggested.
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-V, 5th edn. New School Library.
2.
AntakiC (2004) Reading minds or dealing with interactional implications?Theory & Psychology14(5): 667–683.
3.
AntakiCFinlayWMLWaltonC (2007) Conversational shaping: Staff members’ solicitation of talk from people with an intellectual impairment. Qualitative Health Research17(10): 1403–1414.
Baron-CohenS (1989) The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry30(2): 285–297.
6.
Baron-CohenS (2009) Autism: The empathizing-systemizing (E-S) theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1156(1): 68–80.
7.
Baron-CohenSJolliffeTMortimoreC, et al. (1997) Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry38(7): 813–822.
8.
Baron-CohenSLeslieAMFrithU (1985) Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?Cognition21(1): 37–46.
9.
BeardonL (2017) Autism and Asperger Syndrome in Adults. Sheldon Press.
10.
BetzE (2015) Recipient design in reference choice: Negotiating knowledge, access, and sequential trajectories. Zeitschrift für Gesprächsforschung16: 137–173.
11.
BloomPGermanTP (2000) Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition77(1): B25–B31.
12.
BowlerDM (1992) “Theory of mind” in Asperger’s syndrome Dermot M. Bowler. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry33(5): 877–893.
13.
ClarkHH (1992) Arenas of Language Use. University of Chicago Press.
14.
ClarkHH (1996) Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
15.
ClarkHHBrennanSE (1991) Grounding in communication. In: ResnickLBLevineJBehrendSD (eds) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association, pp.127–149.
16.
ClarkHHSchaeferEF (1989) Collaborating on contributions to conversation. In: DietrichRGraumannCF (eds) Language Processing in a Social Context. North Holland, pp.123–153.
17.
ClarkHHWilkes-GibbsD (1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition22: 1–39.
18.
ClaymanSE (1993) Booing: The anatomy of a disaffiliative response. American Sociological Review58: 110–130.
19.
CunninghamABSchreibmanL (2008) Stereotypy in autism: The importance of function. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders2(3): 469–479.
20.
DahlgrenSSandbergAD (2008) Referential communication in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism12(4): 335–348.
21.
DelvesKStirlingL (2010) Studying misunderstanding and repair in adult-child interactions: Lessons from conversations with typically developing children and high functioning children with autism. In: TreisYDe BusserR (eds) Selected Papers from the 2009 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. Australian Linguistic Society, pp.1–30.
22.
DeppermannA (2015) When recipient design fails: Egocentric turn-design of instructions in driving school lessons leading to breakdowns of intersubjectivity. Zeitschrift für Gesprächsforschung16: 63–101.
23.
EmborgC (2023) Perseverative storytelling in autism as an interactional phenomenon. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders14(1): 1–44.
24.
EnfieldNJStiversT (eds) (2007) Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
25.
FischerK (2016) Designing Speech for a Recipient: The Roles of Partner Modeling, Alignment and Feedback in So-called ‘Simplified Registers’. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
26.
Fogtmann FosgerauCSchöpsABakPL, et al. (2018) Exploring implicit mentalizing as an online process. Nordic Psychology70(2): 129–145.
27.
FoxB (2008) Dynamics of discourse. In: AntosGVentolaE (eds) Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. De Gruyter Mouton, pp.255–284.
28.
FrithUHappéFSiddonsF (1994) Autism and theory of mind in everyday life. Social Development3: 108–124.
29.
GallagherSZahaviD (2008) The Phenomenological Mind. Routledge.
30.
GarfinkelH (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
31.
GarfinkelHSacksH (1986) On formal structures of practical action. In: GarfinkelH (ed.) Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp.157–189.
32.
GernsbacherMA (2006) Toward a behavior of reciprocity. Journal of Developmental Processes1: 139–152.
33.
GernsbacherMAYergeauM (2019) Empirical failures of the claim that autistic people lack a theory of mind. Archives of Scientific Psychology7(1): 102–118.
34.
GilesHHajekCBarkerV, et al. (2006) Accommodation and institutional talk: Communicative dimensions of police-civilian interactions. In: WeatherallBWatsonBGalloisC (eds) The Social Psychology of Language and Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, pp.131–159.
35.
GoffmanE (1975) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press.
36.
GoffmanE (1981) Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
37.
GoodwinC (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In: PsatasG (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Irvington, pp.97–121.
38.
GoodwinC (1986) Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies9: 205–217.
39.
GoodwinCGoodwinMH (2004) Participation. In: DurantiA (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Blackwell, pp.222–244.
HappéFGE (1994) An advanced test of theory of mind – Understanding of story characters thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders24(2): 129–154.
42.
HeasmanBGillespieA (2018) Perspective-taking is two-sided: Misunderstandings between people with Asperger’s syndrome and their family members. Autism22(6): 740–750.
43.
HeasmanBGillespieA (2020) Perspective-taking. In: GlaveanuVP (ed.) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Springer, pp.996–1003.
44.
HepburnABoldenGB (2013) The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Blackwell, pp.57–76.
45.
HeritageJ (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
46.
HeritageJ (2013) Epistemics in conversation. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Blackwell, pp.370–394.
47.
HoeyEMKendrickKH (2017) Conversation analysis. In: de GrootAMBHagoortP (eds) Research Methods in Psycholinguistics and the Neurobiology of Language: A Practical Guide. Wiley, pp.151–173.
JeffersonG (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In: SchenkeinJ (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. Academic Press, pp.219–248.
50.
JeffersonG (1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In: PsathasG (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Irvington, pp.79–96.
51.
JolliffeTBaron-CohenS (1999) The strange stories test: A replication with high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders29(5): 395–406.
52.
KappSKStewardRCraneL, et al. (2019) ‘People should be allowed to do what they like’: Autistic adults’ views and experiences of stimming. Autism23(7): 1782–1792.
53.
KeysarBLinSBarrDJ (2003) Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition89(1): 25–41.
54.
LevinsonSC (2006) On the human ‘interaction engine’. In: EnfieldNJLevinsonSC (eds) Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Berg, pp.39–69.
55.
LovelandK (1993) Narrative language in autism and the theory of mind hypothesis: A wider perspective. In: Baron-CohenSTager-FlusbergHCohenDJ (eds) Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Autism. Oxford University Press, pp.247–266.
56.
LovelandKAMcEvoyRETunaliB, et al. (1990) Narrative story telling in autism and Down’s syndrome. British Journal of Developmental Psychology8: 9–23.
57.
LovelandKATunaliaBMcevoyRE, et al. (1989) Referential communication and response adequacy in autism and Down’s syndrome. Applied Psycholinguistics10(3): 301–313.
58.
McIlvennyP (1996) Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal audience participation in popular public discourse. Language in Society25(1): 27–60.
59.
MandelbaumJ (2013) Storytelling in conversation. In: StiversTSidnellJ (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, pp.492–507.
60.
MaynardDWTurowetzJ (2022) Autistic Intelligence: Interaction, Individuality, and the Challenges of Diagnosis. University of Chicago Press.
61.
MiltonDEM (2012) On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy problem’. Disability & Society27(6): 883–887.
NadigAVivantiGOzonoffS (2009) Adaptation of object descriptions to a partner under increasing communicative demands: A comparison of children with and without autism. Autism Research2(6): 334–347.
64.
OchsEKremer-SadlikTSirotaKG, et al. (2004) Autism and the social world: An anthropological perspective. Discourse Studies6(2): 147–183.
65.
OzonoffSPenningtonBFRogerSJ (1991a) Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry32(7): 1081–1105.
66.
OzonoffSRogersSJPenningtonBF (1991b) Asperger’s syndrome: Evidence of an empirical distinction from high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry32(7): 1107–1122.
67.
PsathasG (1995) Conversation Analysis. The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Sage.
68.
QuesqueFRossettiY (2020) What do theory-of-mind tasks actually measure? Theory and practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science15(2): 384–396.
69.
RajendranGMitchellP (2007) Cognitive theories of autism. Developmental Review27(2): 224–260.
70.
ReddyV (2010) How Infants Know Minds. Harvard University Press.
71.
SacksH (1972) On the analyzability of stories by children. In: GumperzJHymesD (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Rinehart & Winston, pp.325–345.
72.
SacksH (1974a) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In: BaumanRSherzerJ (eds) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge University Press, pp.337–353.
73.
SacksH (1974b) Some consideration of a story told in ordinary conversations. Poetics15: 127–138.
74.
SacksH (1984) Notes on methodology. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press, pp.21–27.
75.
SacksH (1995) Lectures on Conversation, I and II. Published by Gail Jefferson. Blackwell.
76.
SacksHSchegloffEA (1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In: PsathasG (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. Irvington Publishers, pp.15–21.
77.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735.
78.
SchegloffEA (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement. In: TannenD (ed.) Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Press, pp.71–93.
79.
SchegloffEA (1987) Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in interaction. Linguistics25(1): 201–218.
80.
SchegloffEA (1972) Notes on a conversational practise: Formulating place. In: SudnowD (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. Free Press, pp.75–119.
81.
SchegloffEA (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology97(5): 1295–1345.
82.
SchegloffEA (1996) Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In: FoxB (ed.) Studies in Anaphora. John Benjamins, pp.437–485.
83.
SchegloffEA (1997) Third turn repair. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series4: 31–40.
84.
SchegloffEA (2007a) A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics39: 462–482.
85.
SchegloffEA (2007b) Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
86.
SchegloffEA (2013) Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding30: 41–70.
87.
SchegloffEAJeffersonGSacksH (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53(2): 361–382.
88.
SchilbachL (2016) Towards a second-person neuropsychiatry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences371: 20150081.
89.
SchilbachLTimmermansBReddyV, et al. (2013) Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences36(4): 393–414.
90.
SidnellJ (2010) Conversation Analysis – An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
91.
SidnellJStiversT (eds) (2013) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Blackwell.
92.
SteensigJ (2020) Konversationsanalyse. In: BrinkmanSTanggaardL (eds) Kvalitative metoder: En grundbog, 3rd edn. Hans Reitzels Forlag, pp.407–439.
93.
SterponiLFasuloA (2010) “How to go on”: Intersubjectivity and progressivity in the communication of a child with autism. Ethos38(1): 116–142.
94.
StirlingLDouglasSLeekamS, et al. (2014) The use of narrative in studying communication in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Communication in Autism11: 169–216.
95.
StiversT (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction41(1): 31–57.
96.
StiversTRobinsonJD (2006) A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society35(3): 367–392.
97.
Tager-FlusbergH (1995) “Once upon a ribbit”: Stories narrated by autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology13: 45–59.
98.
TurnerM (1999) Annotation: Repetitive behaviour in autism: A review of psychological research. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines40(6): 839–849.
99.
VoldenJMulcahyRFHoldgraferG (1997) Pragmatic language disorder and perspective taking in autistic speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics18(2): 181–198.
100.
WarnellKRRedcayE (2019) Minimal coherence among varied theory of mind measures in childhood and adulthood. Cognition191: 103997.
101.
WilliamsJHWhitenASuddendorfT, et al. (2001) Imitation, mirror neurons and autism. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews25(4): 287–295.
102.
World Health Organization (2018) International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision – The Global Standard for Diagnostic Health Information. Available at: https://icd.who.int/en/ (accessed 20 March 2026).
103.
ZahaviDOvergaardS (2013) Intersubjectivity. In: LaFolletteH (ed) The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell, pp.2755–2765.
