In this article we examined the ways in which strategic ambiguity (Eisenberg, 1984) in the use of keywords (Williams, 1976/1983) served an enabling function within a discourse marked by conflict and ideological divisions. Our analysis focused on the intertextual relationships between five documents intended by the government to guide the development of biotechnology in New Zealand. Through our analysis we identified ‘sustainability’ as a keyword and three major roles for the deployment of the discourse strategy of strategic ambiguity in the use of this keyword. First, strategic ambiguity lent an internal and intertextual coherence to the texts (albeit superficial). Second, it allowed multiple perspectives and objectives to co-exist. Third, strategic ambiguity facilitated the participation of discourse actors who subscribed to ideologies that were more or less incommensurable.
Allen, M. and Caillouet, R. (1994) ‘Legitimation Endeavours: Impression Management Strategies Used by an Organization in Crisis’ , Communication Monographs61: 44-62 .
2.
Bakhtin, M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. and trans. by C. Emerson and M. Holquist . Austin: University of Texas Press .
3.
Barney, J. (1991) ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’ , Journal of Management17(1): 99-120 .
4.
Baxter, J. (2002) ‘Is PDA Really an Alternative? A Reply to West’ , Discourse and Society13(6): 853-859 .
5.
Clegg, S. (1989) Frameworks of Power. London: Sage .
6.
Davenport, S. and Leitch, S. (2005a) ‘Circuits of Power in Practice: Strategic Ambiguity as Delegation of Authority’ , Organization Studies26(11): 1603-1623 .
7.
Davenport, S. and Leitch, S. (2005b) ‘Agoras, Ancient and Modern, and a Framework for Science-Society Debate’ , Science and Public Policy32(2): 137-154 .
8.
Davenport, S. and Leitch, S. (2005c) ‘Articulating Past Glories: Discursive Struggle for New Zealand’s Agricultural Future’ , paper presented at the European Group for Organizational Studies Conference, Berlin.
9.
Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) (2003) Sustainable Development for New Zealand Programme of Action. Wellington, New Zealand: DPMC .
10.
Eisenberg, E. (1984) ‘Ambiguity as Strategy in Organizational Communication’ , Communication Monographs51: 227-242 .
11.
Eisenberg, E. and Goodall, H. (1997) Organizational Communication: Balancing Creativity and Constraint. New York: St Martin’s Press .
12.
Eisenberg, E. and Witten, M. (1987) ‘Reconsidering Openness in Organizational Communication’ , Academy of Management Review12: 418-426 .
13.
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity .
14.
Fairclough, N. (1993) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge .
15.
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, in T. A. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse Studies vol. 2 - A Multi-Disciplinary Introduction, pp. 258-284. London: Sage .
16.
Flowerdew, J. (2004) ‘The Discursive Construction of a World-Class City’ , Discourse and Society15(5): 579-605 .
17.
Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock .
18.
Gladwin, T. , Kennelly, J. and Karuase, T.-S. (1995) ‘Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research’ , Academy of Management Review20(4): 874-908 .
19.
Grant, D. , Hardy, C. , Oswick, C. and Putnam, L. (2004) ‘Introduction’, in D. Grant , C. Hardy , C. Oswick and L. Putnam (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse, pp. 1-36. London: Sage .
20.
Hodge, B. and Louie, K. (1998) The Politics of Chinese Culture and Language: The Art of Reading Dragons. London: Routledge .
21.
Hutchby, I. (2001) “‘Oh”, Irony and Sequential Ambiguity in Arguments’ , Discourse and Society12(2): 123-141 .
22.
Kristeva, J. (1986) The Kristeva Reader. Oxford: Blackwell .
23.
Marshall, J. D. and Toffel, M. W. (2005) ‘Framing the Elusive Concept of Sustainability: A Sustainability Hierarchy’ , Environmental Science and Technology39(2): 673-682 .
24.
Menz, F. (1999) “‘Who Am I Gonna Do this With?”: Self-organization, Ambiguity and Decision-making in Business Enterprise’ , Discourse and Society10(1): 101-128 .
25.
Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (MORST) (2003) New Zealand Biotechnology Strategy: A Foundation for Development with Care. Wellington, New Zealand: MORST .
26.
Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) (2002) Growing an Innovative New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: OPM .
27.
Organic Federation of Aoteroa New Zealand (OFANZ) (2003) Organic Sector Strategy. A Real Opportunity for New Zealand: A Strategy to Unlock the Value in Organic Systems. Auckland, New Zealand: Martech Consulting Group .
28.
Paul, J. and Strbiak, C. (1997) ‘The Ethics of Strategic Ambiguity’ , Journal of Business Communication34: 149-159 .
29.
Pezzoli, K. (1997) ‘Sustainable Development: A Transdisciplinary Overview of the Literature’ , Journal of Environmental Planning and Management40(5): 549-574 .
30.
Royal Commission on Genetic Modification (RCGM) (2001) Report of the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification. Wellington, New Zealand: RCGM .
31.
Sawchuk, P. H. (2003) ‘Informal Learning as a Speech-exchange System: Implications for Knowledge Production, Power and Social Transformation’ , Discourse and Society14(3): 291-307 .
32.
Sellnow, T. and Ulmer, R. (1995) ‘Ambiguous Argument as Advocacy in Organizational Crisis Communication’ , Argumentation and Advocacy31: 138-150 .
33.
Sneijder, P. and te Molder, H. F. M. (2005) ‘Moral Logic and Logical Morality: Attributions of Responsibility and Blame in Online Discourse on Veganism’ , Discourse and Society16(5): 675-696 .
34.
Springett, D. (2003) ‘Business Conceptions of Sustainable Development: A Perspective from Critical Theory’ , Business Strategy and the Environment12(2): 71-86 .
35.
van Dijk, T. (1995) ‘Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis’, in C. Schäffner and A. Wenden (eds) Language and Peace, pp. 17-33. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing .
36.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997a) ‘The Study of Discourse’, in T. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process, pp. 1-34. London: Sage .
37.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997b) ‘Discourse as Interaction in Society’, in T. A. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse Studies vol. 2 - A Multi-Disciplinary Introduction, pp. 1-38. London: Sage .
38.
Weick, K. (1988) ‘Enacted Sensemaking in Crisis Situations’ , Journal of Management Studies25: 305-317 .
39.
Williams, R. (1976/1983) Keywords. London: Fontana .
40.
Williams, C. and Millington A. (2004) ‘The Diverse and Contested Meanings of Sustainable Development’ , The Geographical Journal170(2): 99-104 .
41.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
