Personalised revision of `failed' questions

Abstract

In interviews, it may happen that a respondent gives an answer which seems well formatted, but is not receipted as acceptable by the interviewer. In this article I examine one way in which interviewers display their diagnosis of the problem and act to bring about its solution. In the cases I describe, the interviewers defer revision of the question until they have established a new, more personalized basis for it, informed by (and displaying) their knowledge of the respondents' circumstances. There are three things of interest. The first is how this actually works conversationally; it seems to be structured as an insertion sequence and played out by presequential turns which are highly projective of the respondent's agreement. The second is that the scenario that the interviewer inserts is (in these cases at least) a positive example of what would have been an answer to the `failed' original question. The third is that there is a difference between the original, general question and its subsequent, specific revision. I argue that all these features manifest interviewers' solution of their dilemma in choosing between literal and sensitive questioning.

Keywords

K E YWORDS: conversation analysis (CA)insertion sequences interviews preliminaries questions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antaki, C. (2001) `“D'You Like a Drink?” Dissembling Language and the Construction of an Impoverished Life', Journal of Language and Social Psychology 20: 196—213.

Antaki, C. , Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. and Rapley, M. (2000) `“Brilliant. Next Question . . . ”: High-Grade Assessment Sequences in the Completion of Interactional Units', Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 235—62.

Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Beach, W.A. (1995) `Preserving and Constraining Options: “Okays” and “Official” Priorities in Medical Interviews', in G.H. Morris and R.J. Chenail (eds) The Talk of the Clinic: Explorations in the Analysis of Medical and Therapeutic Discourse, pp. 259—89. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

Bergmann, J.R. (1992) `Veiled Moralities: Notes on Discretion in Psychiatry' , in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 137—62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, D. , and Mercer, N. (1987) Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom. London: Routledge .

Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (1996) `Probing Behaviour in Semi-standardised Survey Interviews', Quality and Quantity 30: 205—30.

Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000) Interaction and the Standardised Survey Interview: The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. and Antaki, C. (1998) `Creating Happy People by Asking Yes/No Questions' , Research on Language and Social Interaction 30: 285—313.

10.

Jefferson, G. (1989) `On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation' , in G. Button and J.R. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

11.

Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation . New York: Academic Press.

12.

Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

McHoul, A. (1990) `The Organisation of Repair in Classroom Talk' , Language in Society 19: 349—77.

14.

Marlaire, C.L. and Maynard, D.W. (1990) `Standardised Testing as an Interactional Phenomenon' , Sociology of Education 63: 83—101.

15.

Maynard, D. and Marlaire, C. (1992) `Good Reasons for Bad Testing Performance: The Interactional Substrate of Educational Testing', Qualitative Sociology 15: 177—202.

16.

Pomerantz, A. (1984) `Giving a Source or a Basis: The Practice in Conversation of Telling “How I Know”', Journal of Pragmatics 8: 607—25.

17.

Pomerantz, A. (1988) `Offering a Candidate Answer', Communication Monographs 55: 360—73.

18.

Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, ed. Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.

19.

Schegloff, E.A. (1972) `Notes on a Conversational Practice', in D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction . New York: Free Press.

20.

Schegloff, E.A. , Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977) `The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organisation of Repair in Conversation', Language 53: 361—82.

21.

Suchman, L.A. and Jordan, B. (1990) `Interactional Trouble in Face-to-Face Survey Interviews' , Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 232—44.