This article examines task-setting sequences in university tutorial sessions. Classes from three higher education institutions were audio- and video-recorded. The resulting data, which included both tutor-led and peer group discussions, were transcribed and analysed using conversation analysis (CA). A number of themes emerged from our analysis. First, we found that the tutor's opening turns routinely followed a three-part sequence, the interpersonal and metadiscursive functions of which, we argue, are crucial components in the educative process. Second, we found that students displayed discursively their reluctance to engage in discussion activities and a resistance towards academic or intellectual identities. In contrast to findings from previous studies of tutor—student interaction, we found that interactional power was negotiated in complex and contradictory ways. This, in turn, may embody a range of complex social functions including attention to the `face' concerns of the group, category membership and orientation to broader cultural trends.
Alemany, I.G. and Majos, T.M. (2000) `Strategies to Regulate Content Development and Interactivity in the Classroom', European Journal of Psychology of Education15(2): 157—71.
2.
Aulls, M. (1998) `Contributions of Classroom Discourse to What Content Students Learn during Curriculum Enactment', Journal of Educational Psychology90(1): 56—69.
3.
Barnes, D. (1992) `The Role of Talk in Learning', in K. Norman (ed.) Thinking Voices: The Work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
4.
Basturkmen, H. (1996) `The Discourse of Academic Seminars: Structures and Strategies of Interaction', unpublished PhD thesis, Aston University, Birmingham.
5.
Benwell, B. (1996) `The Discourse of University Tutorials', unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
6.
Benwell, B. (1999) `The Organisation of Knowledge in British University Tutorial Discourse: Issues, Pedagogic Discourse Strategies and Disciplinary Identity', Pragmatics9(4): 535—65.
7.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Buttny, R. (1993) Social Accountability in Communication. London: Sage.
9.
Channell, J. (1994) Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Chouliaraki, L. (1998) `Regulation in `Progressivist' Pedagogic Discourse: Individualised Teacher—Pupil Talk', Discourse & Society9(1): 5—32.
11.
Considine, D. (1994) `The Loose Cannon Syndrome: University as Business and Students as Consumers', Australian Universities' Review37(1): 36—40.
12.
Craig, D. and Pitts, M.K. (1990) `The Dynamics of Dominance in Tutorial Discussions' , Linguistics28: 125—38.
13.
Delucchi, M. (2000) `Don't Worry, Be Happy: Instructor Likability, Student Perceptions of Learning, and Teacher Ratings in Upper-Level Sociology Courses', Teaching Sociology28(3): 220—31.
14.
Dodson, M.M. (2000) `Dialogue and Interaction in Computer-Mediated Communication: How Undergraduate Students Socially Construct Knowledge during Curriculum Enactment', unpublished PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
15.
Drew, P. (1991) `Asymmetries of Knowledge in Conversational Interaction' , in I. Marková and K. Foppa (eds) Asymmetries in Dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
16.
Drew, P. and Sorjonen, M. (1997) `Institutional Dialogue', in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction . London: Sage.
17.
Edelson, P.J. (2000) `Virtual and Face-To-Face Learning: Meeting Points ', paper presented at La Formacion Virtual en el Nuevo Milenio, Madrid.
18.
Empson, S.B. (1999) `Equal Sharing and Shared Meaning: The Development of Fraction Concepts in a First-Grade Classroom', Cognition and Instruction17(3): 283—342.
19.
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
Fassinger, P.A. (1995) `Understanding Classroom Interaction: Students' and Professors' Contributions to Students' Silence', Journal of Higher Education66(1): 82—96.
21.
Fernandez, J. and Taylor Huber, M. (eds) (2001 ) Irony in Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Fleck, A. (1999) `“We Think He Means . . . ”: Creating Working Definitions through Small Group Discussion', Teaching English in the Two-Year College27(2): 228—31.
23.
Forrester, M.A. and Pike, C.D. (1998) `Learning to Estimate in the Mathematics Classroom: A Conversation Analytic Approach', Journal for Research in Mathematics Education29(3): 334—56.
24.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. (1970) `On Formal Structures of Practical Actions', in J.C. McKinney and E.A Tiryakin (eds) Theoretical Sociology. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
26.
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behaviour . Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday .
27.
Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M.H. (1992) `Assessments and the Construction of Context', in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heyman, R. (1986) `Formulating Topic in the Classroom', Discourse Processes9: 37—55.
30.
Hicks, D. (ed.) (1996) Discourse, Learning and Schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Hutchby, I. (1996) `Power in Discourse: The Case of Arguments on a British Talk Radio Show', Discourse & Society7(4): 481—97.
32.
Jefferson, G. (1984) `Transcript Notation', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Jungwirth, H. (1993) `Routines in Classroom Discourse: An Ethnomethodological Approach', European Journal of Psychology of Education8(4): 375—87.
34.
LaPiere, R.T. (1934) `Attitudes versus Actions', Social Forces13: 230—7.
35.
Malone, M.J. (1997) Worlds of Talk: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Conversation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36.
Mason, L. (1998) `Sharing Cognition to Construct Scientific Knowledge in School Context: The Role of Oral and Written Discourse', Instructional Science26(5): 359—89.
37.
Maybin, J. (1994) `Children's Voices: Talk, Knowledge and Identity' , in D. Graddol, J. Maybin and B. Stierer (eds) Researching Language and Literacy in Social Context. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters/The Open University.
38.
McHoul, A. (1978) `The Organisation of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom', Language and Society7: 183—213.
39.
Mercer, N. (2000) Words and Minds. London: Routledge.
40.
Ogborn, J. (1977) `Questions, Questions, Questions', in P. Black, J. Bliss , B. Hodgson, J. Ogborn and P. Unsworth (eds) Small Group Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Higher Education Learning Project (Physics). London: Heinemann.
41.
Piaget, J. (1970) `Piaget's Theory', in P.H. Mussen (ed.) Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology. New York: Wiley.
42.
Pomerantz, A. (1984) `Pursuing a Response', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality. London : Sage.
44.
Purdy, J. (1999) For Common Things: Irony Trust and Commitment in America Today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
45.
Rice, M. (2000) `Yours Sincerely', The Observer Magazine, 2 April, p. 9.
46.
Riesman, D. (1998) On Higher Education: The Academic Enterprise in an Era of Rising Student Consumerism. Somerset, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
47.
Rivard, L.P. and Straw, L.P. (2000) `The Effect of Talk and Writing on Learning Science: An Exploratory Study', Science Education84(5): 566—93.
48.
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, ed. GailJefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
49.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) `A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-Taking for Conversation', Language50: 696—735.
50.
Sinclair, J. McH. and Coulthard, R.M. (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
51.
Smagorinsky, P. and Fly, P.K. (1993) `The Social Environment of the Classroom: A Vygotskian Perspective on Small-Group Processes', Communication Education42(2): 159—71.
52.
Stokoe, E. (1995) `Gender Differences in Undergraduates'Talk: Contrasting Analyses and What They Offer', Feminism and Psychology5(1): 99—104.
53.
Stokoe, E.H. (1997) `An Evaluation of Two Studies of Gender and Language in Educational Settings', Gender and Education9(2): 233—44.
54.
Stokoe, E.H. (1998) `Talking About Gender: The Conversational Construction of Gender Categories in Academic Discourse', Discourse & Society9(2): 217—40.
55.
Stokoe, E.H. (2000) `Constructing Topicality in University Students' Small-Group Discussion: A Conversation Analytic Approach', Language and Education14(3): 184—203.
56.
Viechnicki, G.B. (1997) `An Empirical Analysis of Participant Intentions: Discourse in a Graduate Seminar', Language and Communication17(2): 103—31.
57.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. London: Harvard University Press.
58.
Wegerif, R. and Mercer, N. (1999) `From Social Interaction to Individual Reasoning: An Empirical Investigation of a Possible Socio-Cultural Model of Cognitive Development', Learning and Instruction9(6): 493—516.
59.
Wilcox, S. (1996) `Fostering Self-Directed Learning in the University Setting', Studies in Higher Education21(2): 165—76. Winter, E. (1994) `Clause Relations as Information Structure: Two Basic Text Structures in English', in M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge.
