This study examines how Chinese mothers adjust their affective expressions on social media under the dual influence of algorithmic governance and gendered norms. Based on semi-structured interviews with 21 active yet pre-commercial mothers across Douyin, Xiaohongshu, and WeChat Channels, and using thematic analysis supported by GPT-4 as an anonymized analytical aid, the study identifies four expressive strategies: tonal softening, indirect articulation, imitation of popular styles, and fragmented expressions of restrained emotion. These strategies sustain visibility while aligning with the “good mother” ideal, revealing ongoing affective calibration between platform logics and cultural expectations. The study proposes the concept of “algorithmically attuned affective labor” (AAL) to describe this adaptive emotional work shaped by predictive interaction with recommendation systems. Findings show that digital motherhood in China is both a site for cultural norm reproduction and a nexus where algorithmic governance intersects with unpaid affective labor, highlighting the need for more transparent, inclusive algorithms that support diverse emotional expression.
AbidinC (2017) #familygoals: family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labour. Social Media + Society3(2): 1–15.
2.
AbidinC (2020) Mapping Internet celebrity on TikTok: exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal12(1): 77–103.
3.
AhmedS (2013) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. London: Routledge.
4.
Banet-WeiserSGillRRottenbergC (2020) Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation. Feminist Theory21(1): 3–24.
5.
BauerLTischerHBansalM (2023) Social commonsense for explanation and cultural bias discovery. In: Proceedings of the 17th conference of the European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May, pp. 3745–3760. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
6.
BaymNK (2015) Personal Connections in the Digital Age. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
BishopS (2019) Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip. New Media & Society21(11–12): 2589–2606.
8.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
9.
BucherT (2012) Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society14(7): 1164–1180.
10.
BucherT (2018) If. . . Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
12.
CheeRMCapperTSMuurlinkOT (2023) The impact of social media influencers on pregnancy, birth, and early parenting experiences: a systematic review. Midwifery120: 103623.
13.
CotterK (2019) Playing the visibility game: how digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society21(4): 895–913.
14.
CuevasLMLeeSHRecaldeD (2024) Fashion influencer moms on Instagram: exploration of their affective labor and self-presentation practices. Social Media + Society10(4): 20563051241308326.
15.
DeVitoMAGergleDBirnholtzJ (2017) “Algorithms ruin everything”: #RIPTwitter, folk theories, and resistance to algorithmic change in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM, pp. 3163–3174.
16.
DouglasSMichaelsM (2005) The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How It Has Undermined All Women. New York: Simon & Schuster.
17.
DuffyBEHundE (2019) Gendered visibility on social media: navigating Instagram’s authenticity bind. International Journal of Communication13: 20.
18.
DuffyBEPooleyJD (2019) Idols of promotion: the triumph of self-branding in an age of precarity. Journal of Communication69(1): 26–48.
19.
DuffyBEPinchASannonS, et al. (2021) The nested precarities of creative labor on social media. Social Media + Society7(2): 20563051211021368.
20.
FangKRepnikovaM (2022) The state-preneurship model of digital journalism innovation: Cases from China. The International Journal of Press/Politics27(2): 497–517.
21.
FengxianW (2012) The “good wife and wise mother” as a social discourse of gender. Chinese Studies in History45(4): 58–70.
22.
FuchsC (2015) Social media and the public sphere. In: FuchsC (ed.) Culture and Economy in the Age of Social Media. London: Routledge, pp. 315–372.
23.
GandiniA (2019) Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations72(6): 1039–1056.
24.
GillR (2007) Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
GillROrgadS (2018) The amazing bounce-backable woman: resilience and the psychological turn in neoliberalism. Sociological Research Online23(2): 477–495.
26.
GillespieT (2014) The relevance of algorithms. In: GillespieTBoczkowskiPJFootKA (eds) Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 167–193.
27.
GillespieT (2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
GreggM (2009) Learning to (love) labour: production cultures and the affective turn. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies6(2): 209–214.
29.
HaimsonOLHoffmannAL (2016) Constructing and enforcing “authentic” identity online: Facebook, real names, and non-normative identities. First Monday21(6). Available at: https://firstmonday.org/article/view/6791/5526
30.
HaysS (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
HeGLeursKLiY (2022) Researching motherhood in the age of short videos: stay-at-home mothers in China performing labor on Douyin. Media and Communication10(3): 273–289.
32.
HochschildAR (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
33.
IllouzE (2007) Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
34.
JarrettK (2015) Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. London: Routledge.
35.
JarrettK (2022) Digital Labor. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
36.
JohnstonDDSwansonDH (2006) Constructing the “good mother”: the experience of mothering ideologies by work status. Sex Roles54(7): 509–519.
37.
KarjusA (2025) Machine-assisted quantitizing designs: augmenting humanities and social sciences with artificial intelligence. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications12(1): 1–18.
38.
KimHBiancoJ (2007) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39.
LiuYXuY (2024) Residual and emergent: good mother ideals in China and the role of cultural values. Family Relations73(5): 3586–3602.
40.
LuptonDPedersenSThomasGM (2016) Parenting and digital media: from the early web to contemporary digital society. Sociology Compass10(8): 730–743.
41.
MäkinenK (2021) Resilience and vulnerability: emotional and affective labour in mom blogging. New Media & Society23(10): 2964–2978.
42.
NegriAHardtM (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
NowellLSNorrisJMWhiteDE, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods16(1): 1–13.
44.
PatilSJaniAKonatamS (2024) Trend amplification or suppression: the dual role of AI in influencing viral content. International Journal of Global Innovations and Solutions (IJGIS)1–13.
45.
RottenbergC (2018) The Rise of Neoliberal Feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
RuckensteinMTurunenLLM (2020) Re-humanizing the platform: content moderators and the logic of care. New Media & Society22(6): 1026–1042.
47.
SaldañaJ (2021) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 4th ed. London: Sage.
TerranovaT (2012) Free labor. In:ScholzT (ed.) Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge, pp.33–57.
50.
ThomasDR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation27(2): 237–246.
51.
TiidenbergKBaymNK (2017) Learn it, buy it, work it: intensive motherhood in the age of personal branding. Popular Communication15(3): 163–177.
52.
TosunLPÖztürkAÖzdemirG (2020) Mother to mother: mothers’ social comparison-based emotions on social networking sites. Europe’s Journal of Psychology16(4): 602–618.
53.
van DijckJPoellTde WaalM (2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
WegenerCJage-D’AprileFPlumeierL (2023) Motherhood in social media: phenomena and consequences of the professionalization of mothers and their media (self- representation). Feminist Media Studies23(7): 3222–3238.
55.
ZengJKayeDBV (2022) From content moderation to visibility moderation: a case study of platform governance on TikTok. Policy & Internet14(1): 79–95.
56.
ZuboffS (2023) The age of surveillance capitalism. In: DuncombeSMassanariAL (eds) Social Theory Re-wired. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, pp. 203–213.
