Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Social media users’ preferences for various content moderation interventions have been widely studied, but the implicit beliefs that connect to these preferences are less understood. Using a nationally representative survey data set, we investigate how end-users’ attitudes toward moderating harmful speech online relate to their offline racial attitudes. We find that racially conservative beliefs are significantly positively related to participants indicating a distaste for concepts related to content moderation and cancel culture, suggesting that racial conservatism may be a crucial factor to consider in assessing these attitudes. We discuss our findings through the lens of moral disengagement theory, positing that supporting “freedom of expression” by way of disagreeing with content moderation and cancel culture may be a contemporary mechanism of morally disengaging with the harmful effects of racially insensitive speech.

Keywords

Cancel culture online harassment Pew Research survey free speech

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alizadeh

Gilardi

Hoes

, et al. (2022) Content moderation as a political issue: the Twitter discourse around Trump’s ban. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media 2: 23.

Appel

Pan

Roberts

(2023) Partisan conflict over content moderation is more than disagreement about facts. Science Advances 9: 6799.

Aratani

(2025) What we know so far about Trump’s orders on diversity, equity and inclusion. The Guardian, 26 January. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/26/trump-executive-orders-dei

Bandura

(1999) Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 3(3): 193–209.

Bandura

(2011) Moral disengagement. In: The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology. DOI: 10.1002/9780470672532.wbepp165.

Baym

(1995) The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In: Jones

(ed.) Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. London: SAGE, pp. 138–163.

Baym

(2010) Personal Connections in the Digital Age. London: Polity Press.

Bliuc

Falukner

Jakubowicz

, et al. (2018) Online networks of racial hate: a systematic review of 10 years of research on cyber-racism. Computers in Human Behavior 87: 75–86.

Bonilla-Silva

(2022) Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

10.

Bresnahan

Zhu

Hooper

, et al. (2023) The negative health effects of anti-Asian stigma in the U.S. during COVID-19. Stigma and Health 8(1): 115–123.

11.

Bridges

(2021–2022) Language on the move: "Cancel Culture," "Critical Race Theory," and the digital public sphere. Yale Law Journal Forum 131: 767–798. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/yljfor131&i=776

12.

Carian

(2022) “No seat at the party”: mobilizing White masculinity in the men’s rights movement. Sociological Focus 55(1): 27–47.

13.

Chong

Druckman

(2007) Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.

14.

Chou

Gaysynsky

(2021) Racism and xenophobia in a pandemic: interactions of online and offline worlds. American Journal of Public Health 111: 773–775. Available at: https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306230

15.

Costley White

(2018) The Branding of Right-wing Activism: The News Media & the Tea Party. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

16.

Engelhardt

(2021) The content of their coverage: contrasting racially conservative and liberal elite rhetoric. Politics, Groups, and Identities 9(5): 935–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1674672

17.

Fisher

Katz

(1999) Social-desirability bias and the validity of self-reported values. Psychology & Marketing 17(2): 105–120.

18.

Giani

Mèon

(2021) Global racist contagion following Donald Trump’s election. British Journal of Political Science 51(3): 1332–1339.

19.

Gilens

(2009) Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

20.

Goldberg

(2015) Are We All Postracial Yet? London: Polity Press.

21.

Greco

Ishizaka

Tasiou

, et al. (2018) On the methodological framework of composite indices: a review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research 141: 61–94.

22.

Hagendoorn

Nekuee

(2018) Education and Racism: A Cross National Inventory of Positive Effects of Education on Ethnic Tolerance. London: Routledge.

23.

Haimson

Delmonaco

Nie

, et al. (2021) Disproportionate removals and differing content moderation experiences for conservative, transgender, and Black social media users: marginalization and moderation gray areas. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction 2021: 21–35.

24.

Hall

Critcher

Jefferson

, et al. (2013) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

25.

Hawkins

Saleem

(2022) How social media use, political identity, and racial resentment affect perceptions of reverse racism in the United States. Computers in Human Behavior 134: 107337.

26.

Hawkins

Roden

Attal

, et al. (2023) Race and gender intertwined: why intersecting identities matter for perceptions of incivility and content moderation on social media. Journal of Communication, 73: 6539–6551.

27.

Hickey

Schmitz

Fessler

, et al. (2023) Auditing Elon Musk’s impact on hate speech and bots. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 17(1): 1133–1137.

28.

Holt

Sweitzer

(2018) More than a black and white issue: ethnic identity, social dominance orientation, and support for the Black Lives Matter movement. Self and Identity 19(1): 16–31.

29.

Jhaver

Zhang

(2023) Do users want platform moderation or individual control? Examining the role of third-person effects and free speech support in shaping moderation preferences. New Media & Society 27(5): 2930–2950.

30.

Jhaver

Zhang

Chen

, et al. (2023) Personalizing content moderation on social media: user perspectives on moderation choices, interface design, and labor. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7: 1–33.

31.

Kaplan

(2025) More speech and fewer mistakes. Meta, 7 January. Available at: https://about.fb.com/news/2025/01/meta-more-speech-fewer-mistakes/

32.

Keum

Miller

(2018) Racism on the Internet: conceptualization and recommendations for research. Psychology of Violence 8(6): 782–791.

33.

Kiesler

Kraut

Resnick

, et al. (2012) Regulating behavior in online communities. In: Kraut

Resnick

Kiesler

(eds) Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design (pp. 112–159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

34.

King

Smith

(2014) “Without regard to race”: critical ideational development in modern America politics. The Journal of Politics 76(4): 958–971.

35.

Kishi

Jones

(2020) Demonstrations and political violence in America: new data for summer 2020. Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, 3 September. Available at: https://acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations-political-violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/

36.

Kozyreva

Herzog

Lewandowsky

, et al. (2023) Resolving content moderation dilemmas between free speech and harmful misinformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120(7): e2210666120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210666120

37.

Lowndes

(2009) From the New Deal to the New Right: Race and the Southern Origins of Modern Conservatism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

38.

Meesala

(2020) Cancel culture: a societal obligation or infringement on free speech? UAB Institute for Human Rights Blog, 4 December. Available at: https://sites.uab.edu/humanrights/2020/12/04/cancel-culture-a-societal-obligation-or-infringement-on-free-speech/

39.

Mendelberg

(2001) The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

40.

Myers West

(2018) Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: user interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society 20(11): 4366–4383.

41.

Naab

Brandmeier

(2021) Uncivil user comments increase users’ intention to engage in corrective actions and their support for authoritative restrictive actions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 98(2): 566–588.

42.

Indran

(2024) Social media discourse on ageism, sexism, and racism: analysis of 150 million tweets over 15 years. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 72(10): 3149–3155.

43.

Nguyen

Criss

Michaels

, et al. (2021) Progress and push-back: how the killings of Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd impacted public discourse on race and racism on Twitter. SSM: Population Health 15: 100922.

44.

Norris

(2023) Cancel culture: Myth or reality? Political Studies 71(1): 145–174.

45.

Peterson-Salahuddin

(2024) Repairing the harm: toward an algorithmic reparations approach to hate speech content moderation. Big Data & Society 11(2): 245333.

46.

Pew Research Center (2021) The state of online harassment. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/

47.

Pew Research Center (2025) The American Trends Panel. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/the-american-trends-panel/

48.

Picarella

(2024) Intersections in the digital society: cancel culture, fake news, and contemporary public discourse. Frontiers in Sociology 9: 1376049.

49.

Roberts

(2017) Content moderation. Encyclopedia of big data. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7371c1hf

50.

Romano

(2021) The second wave of “cancel culture”: how the concept has evolved to mean different things to different people. Vox, 5 May. Available at: https://www.vox.com/22384308/cancel-culture-free-speech-accountability-debate

51.

Saha

Chandrasekharan

De Choudhury

(2019) Prevalence and psychological effects of hateful speech in online college communities. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Web Science, Boston, MA, 30 June–3 July.

52.

Sawyer

Gampa

(2018) Implicit and explicit racial attitudes changed during Black Lives Matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44(7): 1039–1059.

53.

Shook

Lizarraga-Dueñas

(2024) Of DEI and denials: a critical discourse analysis of Texas’ 88th legislative session. Education Policy Analysis Archives 32: 8590.

54.

Spicer

(2022) The marketplace of ideas, cancel culture, and misunderstanding the First Amendment. Communication and Democracy 56(2): 192–197.

55.

Stevens

Nurse

JRC

Arief

(2021) Cyber stalking, cyber harassment, and adult mental health: a systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 24(6): e0253.

56.

Tandoc

Tan Hui Ru

Lee Huei

, et al. (2024) #CancelCulture: examining definitions and motivations. New Media & Society 26(4): 1944–1962.

57.

Tietjen

Tirkkonen

(2023) The rage of lonely men: loneliness and misogyny in the online movement of “involuntary celibates” (incels). Topoi 42: 1229–1241.

58.

Trump

(2020) Remarks at an Independence Day celebration at the Mount Rushmore National Memorial in Keystone, South Dakota (speech). Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-202000494/pdf/DCPD-202000494.pdf

59.

Walters

Ammari

Garimella

, et al. (2024) Online knowledge production in polarized political memes: the case of critical race theory. New Media & Society 27(9): 4997–5021.

60.

Weber

Goncalves

Masullo

, et al. (2024) Who can say what? Testing the impact of interpersonal mechanisms and gender on fairness evaluations of content moderation. Social Media + Society. Epub ahead of print 26 November. DOI: 10.1177/20563051241286702.

61.

West

Greenland

van Laar

(2021) Implicit racism, colour blindness, and narrow definitions of discrimination: why some White people prefer “All Lives Matter” to “Black Lives Matter..” British Journal of Social Psychology 60: 1136–1153.

62.

White

MHII

Crandall

(2017) Freedom of racist speech: ego and expressive threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 113(3): 413–429.

63.

Winter

NJG

(2008) Dangerous Frames: How Ideas about Race & Gender Shape Public Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Moral disengagement and content moderation attitudes: Examining how apathy to online harms may disguise racially conservative beliefs

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References