Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Developed by a Korean start-up called ScatterLab, Luda Lee is an AI-powered social chatbot designed to embody the persona of a 20-year-old, youthful college girl and promoted as “your first AI friend.” A year after the suspension of Luda 1.0 in 2021 amid a heated controversy surrounding Luda 1.0 in 2021 regarding user-initiated abuse and the unethical sourcing of language data, ScatterLab recently reintroduced a generative AI-powered Luda 2.0 to the public, while pursuing the expansion of its operation as a software-as-a-service provider. The article traces the evolution of both Luda and ScatterLab, highlighting the crucial role of user engagement in the making and repurposing of the company’s “proprietary dataset.” It explores how user engagement is not only an objective but also a strategy for corporate growth in the artificial sociality enterprise. Strategies to encourage user engagement, like gendering of the chatbot design, create unanticipated kinds of user engagements and user-generated data. Those data, conceived as materials from which the AI’s competence is absorbed, is constructed as an asset, a material and discursive anchor for the company’s future promises.

Keywords

AI fetish artificial sociality assetization chatbot data digital capitalism gender Korea user engagement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adiwardana

Luong

, et al (2020) Towards a human-like open-domain chatbot. arXiv Preprint:2001.09977.

Amazon Web Services Korea (2023) 100만 명이 사용하는 GenerativeAI 이루다를 만들면서 배운 것 [“What we learned from building GenerativeAI Luda, used by 1 million people”], 12 September. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MR9qURVkt1A (accessed 29 March 2024).

Bender

Gebru

McMillan-Major

, et al (2021) On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be too big? In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (Facct ’21), New Yok, 3–7 March, pp.610–623. New York: ACM.

Birch

Muniesa

(eds) (2020) Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Birch

Cochrane

Ward

(2021) Data as asset? The measurement, governance, and valuation of digital personal data by Big Tech. Big Data & Society 8(1): 1–15.

Caldarini

Jaf

McGarry

(2022) A literature survey of recent advances in chatbots. Information 13(1): 41.

Chandra

Shirish

Srivastava

(2022) To be or not to be . . . human? Theorizing the role of human-like competencies in conversational artificial intelligence agents. Journal of Management Information Systems 39(4): 969–1005.

Choi

(2022a) 인공지능 챗봇 이루다, 과기정통부·KISDI와 협업 . . . “스캐터랩 AI 챗봇 윤리점검표” 개발한다 [“AI Chatbot Luda Lee in collaboration with the Ministry of Science and ICT, and KISDI . . . Making ‘ScatterLab Checklist for AI Chatbot Ethics’”]. Artificial Intelligence Times, 8 June. Available at: https://www.aitimes.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=25233 (accessed 29 March 2024).

Choi

(2022b) 인공지능 챗봇 “이루다,” 대화의 힘으로 100만 명 사로잡았다! [“Luda Lee, an AI chatbot, attracted 1 million users with the power of conversations!”]. Artificial Intelligence Times, 6 December. Available at: https://www.aitimes.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=26718 (accessed 29 March 2024).

10.

Choi

(2014) 김종윤 스캐터랩 대표 “솔로부대 위한 연애 독심술사” [“Jongyoun Kim, CEO of ScatterLab ‘Mind-reader for Singles’”]. News Tomato, 10 December. Available at: https://www.newstomato.com/readNews.aspx?no=519792 (accessed 29 March 2024).

11.

Choi

(2016) 160억개 연애담 엿본 “스캐터랩..”. 애정의 정석을 제시하다 [“‘Scatter Lab’, which peeked into 16 billion love stories . . . proposes the standard for romance”]. Monthly ANDA, September. Available at: https://monthly.newspim.com/news/view/350/?yymm=201609 (accessed 29 March 2024).

12.

Crawford

(2021) The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

13.

Depounti

Saukko

Natale

(2023) Ideal technologies, ideal women: AI and gender imaginaries in Redditors’ discussions on the Replika bot girlfriend. Media, Culture & Society 45(4): 720–736.

14.

Fourcade

Kluttz

(2020) A Maussian bargain: accumulation by gift in the digital economy. Big Data & Society 7(1): 1–16.

15.

Gao

Galley

(2018) Neural approaches to conversational AI. arXiv Preprint:1809.08267.

16.

Jeong

(2020) Troll feminism: the rise of popular feminism in South Korea. PhD Thesis, The University of York, York.

17.

Jeong

Lee

(2018) We take the red pill, we confront the DickTrix: online feminist activism and the augmentation of gendered realities in South Korea. Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 705–717.

18.

Jeong

(2023) SKT, “이루다”에 150억 투자 . . . “에이닷 감성 수준 업그레이드” [“SKT invests 15 billion in Luda . . . ‘Upgrade A-dot’s emotional quality’”]. Hankyoreh, 24 April. Available at: https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/economy/it/1089162.html (accessed 29 March 2024).

19.

Jung

Joo

(2023) Post-“Lee-Luda” personal information protection in Korea: developer responsibility and autonomous AI governance. International Data Privacy Law 13(2): 154–167.

20.

Kampmann

(2024) Venture capital, the fetish of artificial intelligence, and the contradictions of making intangible assets. Economy and Society 53(1): 39–66.

21.

Kim

(2020) 오픈도메인 챗봇 “루다” 육아일기: 탄생부터 클로즈베타까지의 기록 [“A parenting diary for an ‘open-domain chatbot’ ‘Luda’ from birth to closed-beta”]. Available at: https://tv.naver.com/v/16968268 (accessed 29 March 2024)

22.

Knight

(2023) Some glimpse AGI in chatGPT. Others call it a mirage. Wired, 18 April. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-agi-intelligence/ (accessed 29 March 2024).

23.

Lee

(2012) 우리는 디씨 [We, the DC]. Seoul: Imagine.

24.

Lee

(2019) Dialog-BERT: 100억 건의 메신저 대화로 일상대화 인공지능 서비스하기 [Dialog-BERT: powering everyday conversational AI with 10 billion messenger conversations], 28 October. [PowerPoint presentation]. Available at: https://tv.naver.com/v/11212753 (accessed 29 March 2024).

25.

Ludlow

(2024) Reddit’s move to license data for AI finds favor with investors. Bloomberg, 22 March. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-03-22/reddit-s-decision-to-license-data-for-ai-backed-by-investors (accessed 29 March 2024).

26.

Mezzadra

Neilson

(2017) On the multiple frontiers of extraction: excavating contemporary capitalism. Cultural Studies 31(2-3): 185–204.

27.

Nakamura

(2002) Cybertypes: Race: Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. New York: Routledge.

28.

Natale

(2021) Deceitful Media: Artificial Intelligence and Social Life after the Turing Test. New York: Oxford University Press.

29.

Natale

Depounti

(2024) Artificial sociality. Human-machine Communication 7: 83–98.

30.

Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) (2021) 개인정보위, “이루다” 개발사 ㈜스캐터랩에 과징금·과태료 등 제재 처분 [“PIPC imposes sanctions of fines and penalties on ScatterLab, a developer of Iruda”], April, 2021 [Press release]. Available at: https://www.pipc.go.kr/np/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BS074&mCode=C020010000&nttId=7298 (accessed 29 March 2024).

31.

Phillips

(2015) This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

32.

Puschmann

Burgess

(2014) Metaphors of big data. International Journal of Communication 8: 1690–1709.

33.

Ryu

Kim

Seo

(2023) 읽씹할 결심—생성 모델에게 답변 시간 가르치기 [“Decision to leave it on read: teaching the generative model when to reply”]. ScatterLab, 21 July. Available at: https://tech.scatterlab.co.kr/delayed-reply/ (accessed 29 March 2024).

34.

ScatterLab (n.d.) AI윤리 [“AI and Ethics”]. Available at: https://team.luda.ai/ai-ethics (accessed 29 March 2024).

35.

Shum

(2018) From Eliza to XiaoIce: challenges and opportunities with social chatbots. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 19(1): 10–26.

36.

TTimesTV (2023) 이루다 만든 CEO가 말하는 “이루다가 챗GPT보다 밀당 잘하는 이유” (김종윤 대표) [“The CEO who created ‘Luda’ explains ‘Why Luda is better at push-and-pull than ChatGPT (Kim JongYoun, CEO)’”], 16 March. Available at: https://youtu.be/_SdqGw7M2ak (accessed 29 March 2024).

37.

Vorsino

(2021) Chatbots, gender, and race on web 2.0 platforms: Tay. AI as monstrous femininity and abject whiteness. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 47(1): 105–127.

38.

Yonhap News (2021) 출시 일주일 만에 . . . “20살 AI 여성” 성희롱이 시작됐다 [“Just one week since its release . . . ‘20-year-old AI woman’ started getting sexual harassment”], 8 January. Available at: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20210107153300017 (accessed 29 March 2024).

39.

Zhou

Gao

, et al (2020) The design and implementation of xiaoice, an empathetic social chatbot. Computational Linguistics 46(1): 53–93.

40.

Zuboff

(2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.

“Capacities for social interactions are just being absorbed by the model”: User engagement and assetization of data in the artificial sociality enterprise

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References