Using an ethnographic approach, this study examines the social media-based local public sphere during a by-election campaign in Jászberény, a medium-sized city in Hungary. We conducted online observations and interviews with local actors to explore the construction and functioning of the communication arena on Facebook, the central social media platform of local politics. We show that there is a vibrant local public on Facebook, where local elites and citizens actively discuss local issues. This public is highly centralized, dominated by a few key actors, and polarized along political lines, but it is still integrated through frequent interactions between actors belonging to different political blocs. It is also highly personal and embedded in the offline lifeworld. The issues discussed online can lead to policy actions. The local Facebook public is also characterized by strong negativity and the presence of deceptive techniques acting as a deterrent to participation in online civic activities.
BainesD (2012) Hyper-local news: a glue to hold rural communities together?Local Economy27(2): 152–166.
2.
BeneM (2022) Viral political marketing. In: CeronA (ed.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Technology and Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 257–261.
3.
BeneMDobosG (2023) In the web of the parties: local politicians on Facebook in Hungary. Media and Communication11: 141–152.
4.
BeneMDobosG [Unpublished book manuscript] Networked locality: social media and local politics in Hungary.
5.
BennettWLPfetschB (2018) Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication68(2): 243–253.
6.
BimberBde ZúñigaHG (2020) The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society22(4): 700–715.
7.
boydd (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: PapacharissiZ (ed.) A Networked Self. London: Routledge, pp. 47–66.
8.
BrunsA (2023) From “the” public sphere to a network of publics: towards an empirically founded model of contemporary public communication spaces. Communication Theory33: 70–81.
9.
BrunsAHighfieldT (2015) Is Habermas on Twitter? Social media and the public sphere. In: BrunsAEnliGSkogerboE, et al. (eds) The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 56–73.
10.
BucherTHelmondA (2018) The affordances of social media platforms. In: BurgessJMarwickAPoellT (eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Media, Köt. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 233–254.
11.
CastellsM (2008) The new public sphere: global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science616(1): 78–93.
12.
ChadwickA (2017) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
ColemanS (2005) New mediation and direct representation: reconceptualizing representation in the digital age. New Media & Society7(2): 177–198.
14.
ColemanSThumimNBirchallC, et al. (2016) The Mediated City: The News in a Post-Industrial Context. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
15.
DahlgrenP (2005) The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication22(2): 147–162.
16.
DeweyJ (1927) The Public and Its Problems. 1st ed. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.
17.
EmersonRM-RachelIF-LindaLS (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
EsterbergK (2002) Qualitative Methods in Social Research. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
19.
FirmstoneJColemanS (2014) The changing role of the local news media in enabling citizens to engage in local democracies. Journalism Practice8(5): 596–606.
FriedlandLALongCCShinYJ, et al. (2007) The local public sphere as a networked space. In: ButschR (ed.) Media and Public Spheres. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–57.
22.
GerbaudoP (2022) Theorizing reactive democracy: the social media public sphere, online crowds and the plebiscitary logic of online reactions. Democratic Theory9(2): 120–138.
23.
HabermasJ (1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
HabermasJ (2006) Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension?Communication Theory16(4): 411–426.
25.
HeissR (2021) The affective foundation of political opinion expression on social media: a panel analysis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research33(1): 57–75.
KelmO (2020) Why do politicians use Facebook and Twitter the way they do? The influence of perceived audience expectations. SCM Studies in Communication and Media9(1): 8–34.
29.
KovarekDLittvayL (2022) Greater than the sum of its part(ie)s: opposition comeback in the 2019 Hungarian local elections. East European Politics38(3): 382–399.
30.
LünenborgMRaetzschC (2017) From public sphere to performative publics: developing media practice as an analytic model. In: FoellmerSLünenborgMRaetzschC (eds) Media Practices, Social Movements, and Performativity. New York: Routledge, pp. 11–35.
31.
MartinGJMcCrainJ (2019) Local news and national politics. American Political Science Review113(2): 372–384.
NewmanNFletcherREddyK, et al. (2023) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
34.
PapacharissiZA (2010) A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
PapacharissiZA (2015) Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
PfetschBMaierDStoltenbergD, et al. (2021) Topographies of local public spheres on social media: the scope of issues and interactions. International Journal of Communication15: 3645–3670.
37.
PinkSHorstHPostillJ, et al. (2016) Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. London: SAGE.
38.
PutnamRD (2001) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. 1st ed. New York: Touchstone Books by Simon & Schuster.
39.
RainieLWellmanB (2014) Networked: The New Social Operating System. Illustrated ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
SchmidtJ-H (2014) Twitter and the rise of personal publics. In: WellerKBrunsABurgessJ, et al. (eds) Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 3–14.
41.
Stromer-GalleyJ (2014) Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
SzabóGKmettyZMolnárEK (2021) Politics and incivility in the online comments: what is beyond the norm-violation approach?International Journal of Communication15: 26.
43.
ThorsonKMedeirosMCotterK, et al. (2020) Platform civics: Facebook in the local information infrastructure. Digital Journalism8(10): 1231–1257.
44.
Wahl-JorgensenK (2019) The challenge of local news provision. Journalism20(1): 163–166.
45.
WaldherrAStoltenbergDMaierD, et al. (2023) Translocal networked public spheres: spatial arrangements of metropolitan Twitter. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 7March. DOI: 10.1177/14614448231156579.
