Society has normalized the use of the screenshot feature to surreptitiously capture and share private digital messages. While screenshots have utilitarian purposes, we provide evidence that this feature enables violations of interpersonal privacy expectations. In addition, we extend communication privacy management (CPM) theory beyond its interpersonal limitations to include platforms as privacy rulemakers through explicit cues and embedded trust. We conducted a 2(Accountability cue: present or absent) × 3(Platform trust: high, low, control) between-subjects experiment to understand their conditional impact on control over and disclosure of personal and co-owned information within a proposed digital messaging platform (N = 307). Our experimental results showcase the power of a screenshot accountability cue and platform trust on privacy perceptions and management within messaging platforms. Implications for design against the screenshot feature are discussed.
AndersonCLAgarwalR (2011) The digitization of healthcare: boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Information Systems Research22(3): 469–490.
2.
BatemanPJPikeJCButlerBS (2011) To disclose or not: publicness in social networking sites. Information Technology & People24(1): 78–100.
3.
BodóB (2021) Mediated trust: a theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Media & Society23(9): 2668–2690.
4.
BussoneAKasadhaBStumpfS, et al. (2020) Trust, identity, privacy, and security considerations for designing a peer data sharing platform between people living with HIV. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4: 1–27.
5.
ChildJTStarcherSC (2016) Fuzzy Facebook privacy boundaries: exploring mediated lurking, vague-booking, and Facebook privacy management. Computers in Human Behavior54: 483–490.
6.
CitronDK (2022) The Fight for Privacy: Protecting Dignity, Identity, and Love in the Digital Age. London: W.W. Norton; Penguin Vintage.
7.
CramerEMJenkinsBMSangY (2022) What’s behind that screenshot? Digital windows and capturing data on screen. Convergence29: 467–480.
8.
CramerEMSangYParkS (2019) Uses and gratifications of the screenshot in human communication: an exploratory study. The Electronic Journal of Communication29: 1–20.
DraperNATurowJ (2019) The corporate cultivation of digital resignation. New Media & Society21(8): 1824–1839.
11.
FlewT (2021) The global trust deficit disorder: a communications perspective on trust in the time of global pandemics. Journal of Communication71(2): 163–186.
12.
HallinanBScharlachRShifmanL (2022) Beyond neutrality: conceptualizing platform values. Communication Theory32(2): 201–222.
13.
HartzogW (2018) Privacy’s Blueprint: The Battle to Control the Design of New Technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
HauffSVeitD (2014) Communication privacy management in the digital age: effects of general and situational privacy concerns. Available at: https://d-nb.info/1222438771/34
15.
HerbstKCFinkelEJAllanD, et al. (2012) On the dangers of pulling a fast one: advertisement disclaimer speed, brand trust, and purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Research38(5): 909–919.
16.
JaynesV (2020) The social life of screenshots: the power of visibility in teen friendship groups. New Media & Society22(8): 1378–1393.
17.
KangHOhJ (2021) Communication privacy management for smart speaker use: integrating the role of privacy self-efficacy and the multidimensional view. New Media & Society5: 1153–1175.
18.
KarwatzkiSTrenzMTuunainenVK, et al. (2017) Adverse consequences of access to individuals’ information: an analysis of perceptions and the scope of organisational influence. European Journal of Information Systems26(6): 688–715.
19.
KimJGambinoASundarSS, et al. (2018) Interface cues to promote disclosure and build community: an experimental test of crowd and connectivity cues in an online sexual health forum. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction2: 1–18.
20.
KofoedJLarsenMC (2016) A snap of intimacy: photo-sharing practices among young people on social media. First Monday21: 6905.
21.
KoohikamaliMPeakDAPrybutokVR (2017) Beyond self-disclosure: disclosure of information about others in social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior69: 29–42.
22.
KropczynskiJAljalladZElrodNJ, et al. (2021) Towards building community collective efficacy for managing digital privacy and security within older adult communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4: 1–27.
23.
LeeHLimDKimH, et al. (2015) Compensation paradox: the influence of monetary rewards on user behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology34(1): 45–56.
24.
LeeYCYamashitaNHuangY (2020) Designing a chatbot as a mediator for promoting deep self-disclosure to a real mental health professional. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4: 1–27.
25.
LiYKobsaA (2020) Context and privacy concerns in friend request decisions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology71(6): 632–643.
26.
LiYKouYLeeJS, et al. (2018) Tell me before you stream me: managing information disclosure in video game live streaming. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction2: 1–18.
27.
McNealyJMullisMD (2019) Tea and turbulence: communication privacy management theory and online celebrity gossip forums. Computers in Human Behavior92: 110–118.
28.
MansourAFranckeH (2021) Collective privacy management practices: a study of privacy strategies and risks in a private Facebook group. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction5: 1–27.
29.
MarwickAEboydd (2014) Networked privacy: how teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society16(7): 1051–1067.
30.
PaulCScheibeKNilakantaS (2020) Privacy concerns regarding wearable IoT devices: how it is influenced by GDPR? In: Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/286030593.pdf
31.
PetronioS (2002) Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. New York: SUNY Press.
32.
PetronioS (2013) Brief status report on communication privacy management theory. Journal of Family Communication13(1): 6–14.
33.
PetronioSReiersonJ (2009) Regulating the privacy of confidentiality: grasping the complexities through communication privacy management theory. In: AfifiTDAfifiWA (eds) Uncertainty, Information Management, and Disclosure Decisions: Theories and Applications. New York: Routledge, pp. 365–383.
RichardsN (2015) Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
SteuberKRMcLarenRM (2015) Privacy recalibration in personal relationships: rule usage before and after an incident of privacy turbulence. Communication Quarterly63(3): 345–364.
37.
TrepteS (2021) The social media privacy model: privacy and communication in the light of social media affordances. Communication Theory31(4): 549–570.
38.
VeltenJCArifRMoehringD (2017) Managing disclosure through social media: how Snapchat is shaking boundaries of privacy perceptions. The Journal of Social Media in Society6(1): 220–250.
39.
VenetisMKGreeneKMagsamen-ConradK, et al. (2012) “you can’t tell anyone but . . . ”: exploring the use of privacy rules and revealing behaviors. Communication Monographs79(3): 344–365.
40.
WarnerMGutmannASasseMA, et al. (2018) Privacy unraveling around explicit HIV status disclosure fields in the online geosocial hookup app grindr. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction2: 1–22.
41.
WiencierzCLünichM (2022) Trust in open data applications through transparency. New Media & Society24(8): 1751–1770.
42.
WirthJMaierCLaumerS, et al. (2019) Perceived information sensitivity and interdependent privacy protection: a quantitative study. Electronic Markets29(3): 359–378.
43.
WottrichVMVerleghPWSmitEG (2017) The role of customization, brand trust, and privacy concerns in advergaming. International Journal of Advertising36(1): 60–81.
44.
XuHDinevTSmithJ, et al. (2011) Information privacy concerns: linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems12(12): 1.
