According to communication privacy management (CPM) theory, people manage the boundaries around information that they seek to keep private. How does this theory apply when employees are monitored electronically? Using data from 154 face-to-face interviews with employees from a range of organizations, the authors identified various ways organizations, employees, and coworkers describe electronic surveillance and the privacy expectations, boundaries, and turbulence that arise. Privacy boundaries are established during new-employee orientation when surveillance is described as coercive control, as benefiting the company, and/or as benefiting employees. Correlations exist between the surveillance-related socialization messages interviewees remember receiving and their attitudes. Although little boundary turbulence appeared, employees articulated boundaries that companies should not cross. The authors conclude that CPM theory suppositions need modification to fit the conditions of electronic surveillance.
Alge, B.J. (2001). Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice . Journal of Applied Psychology , 86, 797-804 .
2.
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Pacific Grove, CA : Brooks/Cole .
3.
Altman, I. (1977). Privacy regulation: Culturally universal or culturally specific . Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 66-83 .
4.
American Management Association. (2001). 2001 survey on workplace monitoring and surveillance. Available from www.amanet.org
5.
American Management Association. (2003). 2003 e-mail rules, policies and practices survey. Available from www.amanet.org
6.
American Management Association. (2004). 2004 workplace e-mail and instant messaging survey summary. Available from www.amanet.org
7.
American Management Association. (2005). 2005 electronic monitoring and surveillance survey. Available from www.amanet.org
8.
Barge, J.K. , & Schleuter, D.W. (2004). Memorable messages and newcomer socialization . Western Journal of Communication, 68, 233-257 .
9.
Botan, C. (1996). Communication work and electronic surveillance: A model for predicting panoptic effects . Communication Monographs , 63, 293-313 .
10.
Button, G. , Mason, D. , & Sharrock, W. (2003). Disempowerment and resistance in the print industry? Reactions to surveillance-capable technology . New Technology, Work and Employment, 18, 50-61 .
11.
Collinson, D.L. (2003). Identities and insecurities: Selves at work . Organization, 10, 527-547 .
12.
Comer, D. (1991). Organizational newcomers' acquisition of information from peers . Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 64-89 .
13.
Dubie, D. (2007). New tool for monitoring employee behavior: ETelemetry Metron EBA analyzes a company's network and provides a map of who talks to whom. PC World. Available from www.pcworld.com
14.
D'Urso, S.C. (2006). Who's watching us at work? Toward a structural-perceptual model of electronic monitoring and surveillance in organizations . Communication Theory, 16, 281-303 .
15.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review . Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74 .
16.
Fairweather, N.B. (1999). Surveillance in employment. The case of teleworking . Journal of Business Ethics, 22, 39-49 .
17.
Findlay, P. , & McKinlay, A. (2003). Surveillance, electronic communications technology and regulation . Industrial Relations Journal, 34, 305-318 .
18.
Gossett, L.M. , & Kilker, J. (2006). My job sucks: Examining counterinstitutional Web sites as locations for organizational member voice, dissent, and resistance . Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 63-90 .
19.
Gumpert, G. , & Drucker, S.J. (1998). The demise of privacy in a private world: From front porches to chat rooms . Communication Theory, 8, 408-425 .
20.
Hardy, C. , & Clegg, S. (1996). Some dare call it power. In S. Clegg , C. Hardy , & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 622-641). London: Sage .
21.
Hoffman, W.M. , Hartman, L.P. , & Rowe, M. (2003). You've got mail . . . and the boss knows: A survey by the Center for Business Ethics of companies' email and Internet monitoring . Business and Society Review, 108, 285-307 .
22.
Holmes, J. (2003). Formulating an effective computer use policy . Information Strategy: The Executive's Journal, 20(1), 26-32 .
23.
King, N.J. (2003). Electronic monitoring to promote national security impacts workplace privacy . Employee Responsibility and Rights Journal, 15(3), 127-147 .
24.
Lane, F. (2003). The naked employee: How technology is compromising workplace privacy . New York : American Management Association.
25.
Lee, S. , & Kleiner, B.H. (2003). Electronic surveillance in the workplace . Management Research News, 26( 2/3/4 ), 72-81 .
26.
Mason, D. , Button, G. , Lankshear, G. , Coates, S. , & Sharrock, W. (2002). On the poverty of apriorism: Technology, surveillance in the workplace and employee responses. Information , Communication and Society, 5, 555-572 .
27.
Mattson, M. , & Brann, M. (2002). Managed care and the paradox of patient confidentiality: A case study analysis from a communication boundary management perspective . Communication Studies, 53, 337-357 .
28.
Miller, S. , & Weckert, J. (2000). Privacy, the workplace and the Internet . Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 255-265 .
29.
Mumby, D.K. (2005). Theorizing resistance in organization studies: A dialectical approach . Management Communication Quarterly , 19, 19-44 .
30.
Myers, K.K. (2005). A burning desire: Assimilation into a fire department . Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 344-384 .
31.
Orrego, V.O. , Smith, S.W. , Mitchell, M.M. , Johnson, A.J. , Yun, K.A. , & Greenberg, B. (2000). Disclosure and privacy issues on television talk shows. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 249-259). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
32.
Persson, A.J. , & Hansson, S.O. (2003). Privacy at work: Ethical criteria . Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 59-70 .
33.
Petronio, S. (1991). Communication boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples . Communication Theory, 1, 311-335 .
34.
Petronio, S. (2000). The boundaries of privacy: Praxis of everyday life. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 37-49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
35.
Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure . Albany: State University of New York Press .
36.
Petronio, S. (2004). Road to developing communication privacy management theory: Narrative in progress, please stand by. Journal of FamilyCommunication, 4, 193-208 .
37.
Petronio, S. , Ellemers, N. , Giles, H. , & Gallois, C. (1998). (Mis)communicating across boundaries . Communication Research, 6, 571-595 .
38.
Petronio, S. , Flores, L. , & Hecht, M. (1997). Locating the voice of logic: Disclosure of sexual abuse . Western Journal of Communication, 61, 101-113 .
39.
Petronio, S. , Sargent, J. , Andea, L. , Reganis, P. , & Cichocki, D. (2004). Family and friends as healthcare advocates: Dilemmas of confidentiality and privacy . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 33-52 .
40.
Rosenfeld, P. , Giacalone, R.A. , & Riordan, C.A. (1995). Impression management in organizations: Theory, measurement, practice. New York: Routledge .
41.
Schultz, P. (2000). Sex offender community notification policies: Balancing privacy and disclosure. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 263-274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
42.
Sewell, G. , & Barker, J.R. (2006). Coercion versus care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance . Academy of Management Review , 31, 1-24 .
43.
Stanton, J. , & Stam, K. (2003). Information technology, privacy, and power within organizations: A view from boundary theory and social exchange perspectives . Surveillance and Society, 1(2), 152-190 . Available from www.surveillance-and-society.org
44.
Thibaut, J.W. , & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley .
45.
Thompson, P. (2003). Fantasy island: A Labour process critique of the “age of surveillance.”Surveillance and Society, 1(2), 138-151 . Available from www.surveillance-and-society.org
46.
Townsend, A.M. , & Bennett, J.T. (2003). Privacy, technology, and conflict: Emerging issues and action in workplace privacy . Journal of Labor Research , 24, 195-205 .
47.
Waldeck, J.H. , Seibold, D.R. , & Flanagin, A.J. (2004). Organizational assimilation and communication technology use . Communication Monographs , 71, 161-183 .
48.
Weick, K.E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
49.
Whitty, M.T. (2004). Should filtering software be utilized in the workplace? Australian employees' attitudes toward Internet usage and surveillance of the Internet in the workplace . Surveillance and Society, 2(1), 39-54 . Available from www.surveillance-and-society.org
50.
Willis, L. (2003, April 21). Employers increase monitoring of workers ' Web usage. Grand Rapids Press , p. B3.
