Guided by communication privacy management theory and appraisal theories of emotion this study examined how emotions (hurt, anger, and fear) and communicative responses (approach and withdrawal strategies) to boundary turbulence correspond with relational outcomes. A community sample of individuals (N = 273) reported on instances when another person mishandled their private information. Results showed that hurt, anger, fear, distancing, and a combination of anger and distributive responses all corresponded with relational damage, whereas integrative responses and anger were associated with relational improvement. Taken together, our study provides evidence that boundary turbulence does not have to be a negative experience and can actually result in improved relational functioning.
AfifiT. A.McManusT.SteuberK. R.CohoA. (2009). Verbal avoidance and dissatisfaction in intimate conflict situations. Human Communication Research, 35, 357–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01355.x
2.
AfifiT. D. (2003). “Feeling caught” in stepfamilies: Managing boundary turbulence through appropriate communication privacy rules. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 20, 729–755.
3.
AfifiT. D.SchrodtP. (2003). “Feeling caught” as a mediator of adolescents’ and young adults’ avoidance and satisfaction with their parents in divorced and non-divorced households. Communication Monographs, 70, 142–173.
4.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
AllenM. W.CoopmanS. J.HartJ. L.WalkerK. L. (2007). Workplace surveillance and managing privacy boundaries. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 172–200.
6.
BachmanG. F.GuerreroL. K. (2006). Relational quality and communicative responses following hurtful events in dating relationships: An expectancy violations analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 943–963.
7.
BaxterL. A.MontgomeryB. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
BuchananC. M.MaccobyE. E.DornbuschS. M. (1991). Caught between parents: Adolescents’ experience in divorced homes. Child Development, 62, 1008–1029.
10.
BussD. M. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 735–747.
11.
CaughlinJ. P.VangelistiA. L. (2006). Conflict in dating and marital relationships. In OetzelJ. G.Ting-ToomeyS. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice (pp. 129–157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
ChildJ.PearsonJ.PetronioS. (2009). Blogging, communication, and privacy management: Development of the blogging privacy management measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2079–2094.
13.
ChildJ.PetronioS.Agyeman-BaduE. A.WestermannD. (2011). Blog scrubbing: Exploring triggers that change privacy rules. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2017–2027.
14.
CsobothC. T.BirkásE.PureblG. (2005). Living in fear of experiencing physical and sexual abuse is association with severe depressive symptomology among young women. Journal of Women’s Health, 14, 441–448.
15.
DillardJ. P. (1994). Rethinking the study of fear appeals: An emotional perspective. Communication Theory, 4, 205–323.
16.
DillardJ. P.KinneyT. A.CruzM. G. (1996). Influence, appraisals, and emotions in close relationships. Communication Monographs, 63, 105–130.
17.
FeeneyJ. A. (2004). Hurt feelings in couple relationships: Towards integrative models of the negative effects of hurtful events. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 487–508.
18.
FeeneyJ. A. (2005). Hurt feelings in couple relationships: Exploring the role of attachment and perceptions of personal injury. Personal Relationships, 12, 253–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00114.x
19.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
20.
FrijdaN. H.KuipersP.ter SchureE. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228.
21.
GrossM. A.GuerreroL. K. (2000). Managing conflict appropriately and effectively: An application of the competence model to Rahim’s organizational conflict styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 200–226.
22.
GolishT. D.CaughlinJ. P. (2002). I'd rather not talk about it: Adolescents’ and young adults’ use of topic avoidance in stepfamilies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 78–106.
23.
GottmanJ. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 6–15.
24.
GuerreroL. K.AndersenP. A.JorgensenP. F.SpitzbergB. H.EloyS. V. (1995). Coping with the green-eyed monster: Conceptualizing and measuring communicative responses to jealousy. Western Journal of Communication, 59, 270–304.
25.
HawkS. T.KeijsersL.HaleW. W.MeeusW. (2009). Mind your own business! Longitudinal relations between perceived privacy invasion and adolescent–parent conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 511–520.
26.
HunterJ. E.GerbingD. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 267–320). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
27.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H. (2003). Responses to changes in relational uncertainty within dating relationships: Emotions and communication strategies. Communication Studies, 54, 282–305.
28.
KrokoffL. J. (1991). Communication orientation as a moderator between strong negative affect and marital satisfaction. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 51–65.
29.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352–367.
30.
LazarusR. S. (2001). Relational meaning and discrete emotions. In SchererK. R.SchorrA.JohnstoneT. (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 37–67). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
32.
LearyM. R.SpringerC. (2001). Hurt feelings: The neglected emotion. In KowalskiR. M. (Ed.), Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships (pp. 151–175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10365-006
33.
LearyM. R.SpringerC.NegelL.AnsellE.EvansK. (1998). The causes, phenomenology, and consequences of hurt feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1225–1237.
34.
McLarenR. M.SolomonD. H. (2010). Appraisal and distancing responses to hurtful messages II: A diary study of dating partners and friends. Communication Research Reports, 27, 193–206.
35.
MillerC. W.RoloffM. E. (2005). Gender and willingness to confront hurtful messages from romantic partners. Communication Quarterly, 53, 323–337.
36.
OatleyK. (1992). Best laid schemes: The psychology of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
PetronioS. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
38.
PetronioS. (2010). Communication privacy management theory: What do we know about family privacy regulation?Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 175–196.
39.
PetronioS.CaughlinJ. (2006). Communication privacy management theory: Understanding families. In BraithwaiteD.BaxterL. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication (pp. 35–49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
PetronioS.JonesS. (2006). When “friendly advice” becomes a privacy dilemma for pregnant couples. In TurnerL. H.WestR. L. (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41.
PetronioS.SargentJ. (2011). Disclosure predicaments arising during the course of patient care: Nurses’ privacy management. Health Communication, 26, 255–266.
42.
PetronioS.SargentJ.AndeaL.ReganisP.CichockiD. (2004). Family and friends as healthcare advocates: Dilemmas of confidentiality and privacy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 33–52.
43.
RoloffM. E.IfertD. E. (2000). Conflict management through avoidance: Withholding complaints, suppressing arguments, and declaring topics taboo. In PetronioS. (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 151–163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
RosemanI. J.SmithC. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In SchererK. R.SchorrA.JohnstoneT. (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Oxford University.
45.
ShaverP.SchwartzJ.KirsonD.O’ConnorO. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086.
46.
SillarsA.CanaryD. J.TafoyaM. (2004). Communication, conflict, and the quality of family relationships. In VangelistiA. L. (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 413–446). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
SmithC. A.KirbyL. D. (2001). Affect and cognitive appraisal: From content to process models. In ForgasJ. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 75–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
SnyderJ. L.CornettoK. M. (2009). Employee perceptions of e-mail monitoring from a boundary management perspective. Communication Studies, 60, 476–492.
49.
SpitzbergB. H.CanaryD. J.CupachW. R. (1994). A competence-based approach to the study of interpersonal conflict. In CahnD. D. (Ed.), Conflict in personal relationships (pp. 183–202). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
SteuberK. R.SolomonD. H. (2012). Relational uncertainty, partner interference, and privacy boundary turbulence: Explaining spousal discrepancies in infertility disclosures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 3–27.
51.
StilesW. B. (1987). “I have to talk to somebody”: A fever model of disclosure. In DerlegaV. J.BergJ. H. (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 257–282). New York: Plenum Press.
52.
TavrisC. (1984). On the wisdom of counting to ten: Personal and social dangers of anger expression. In ShaverP. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 170–192). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53.
VangelistiA. L.CrumleyL. P. (1998). Reactions to messages that hurt: The influence of relational contexts. Communication Monographs, 65, 173–196.
54.
VangelistiA. L.YoungS. L. (2000). When words hurt: The effect of perceived intentionality on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 393–424.
55.
VangelistiA. L.YoungS. L.Carpenter-TheuneK. E.AlexanderA. L. (2005). Why does it hurt? The perceived causes of hurt feelings. Communication Research, 32, 443–477. doi:10.1177/0093650205277319
56.
WitteK. (1998). Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In AndersenP. A.GuerreroL. K. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 423–450). New York, NY: Academic.
