Media framing and public support for China’s social credit system: An experimental study

Abstract

Although China’s social credit system (SCS) is widely portrayed by Western media as repressive surveillance, recent studies show that it receives high levels of support among Chinese citizens. Previous research suggests that people support the SCS because they lack knowledge about the system. This study further examines the roles of media framing (Western vs Chinese framing) and monitored behaviors (financial vs social behaviors). The results from a survey experiment conducted in China (N = 1600) demonstrate that when exposed to Western framing, public support for the SCS is lower, but only when participants are informed that the SCS monitors social behavior. By contrast, when people are told that the SCS focuses on financial behavior, Western framing exposure is not associated with low levels of public support. The findings suggest that an expansion to social domains and exposure to Western media framing will likely result in decreased support for the system.

Keywords

Financial and social behavior hostile media effect information and knowledge inoculation media framing public support social credit system

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banas

Rains

(2010) A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs 77(3): 281–311.

Black

JEJ

(2015) The Barbarian Press: the inoculation of the Chinese against Western media. Southern Semiotic Review 2(1): 93–128.

Brussee

(2021) China’s Social Credit System is actually quite boring. Foreign Policy. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/09/15/china-social-credit-system-authoritarian/ (accessed 26 June 2023).

Chen

Engelmann

Grossklags

(2022) Ordinary people as moral heroes and foes: digital role Model narratives propagate social norms in China’s Social Credit System. In: Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, & society, pp. 181–191. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3514094.3534180

Chen

Cheung

(2017) The transparent self under big data profiling: privacy and Chinese legislation on the Social Credit System. Journal of Comparative Law 12: 356–378.

Cheung

Chen

(2022) From datafication to data state: making sense of China’s Social Credit System and its implications. Law & Social Inquiry 47(4): 1137–1171.

Chorzempa

Triolo

Sacks

(2018) China’s social credit system: a mark of progress or a threat to privacy? Available at: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/chinas-social-credit-system-mark-progress-or-threat-privacy (accessed 26 June 2023).

Creemers

(2018) China’s Social Credit System: an evolving practice of control. SSRN. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3175792 (accessed 26 June 2023).

Dai

(2020) Enforcing law and norms for good citizens: one view of China’s Social Credit System project. Development 63(1): 38–43.

10.

Ding

Zhong

(2021) Rethinking China’s Social Credit System: a long road to establishing trust in Chinese society. Journal of Contemporary China 30(130): 630–644.

11.

Elkins

Sides

(2007) Can institutions build unity in multiethnic states? American Political Science Review 101(4): 693–708.

12.

Engelmann

Chen

Dang

, et al. (2021) Blacklists and redlists in the Chinese social credit system: diversity, flexibility, and comprehensiveness. In: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, & society, pp. 78–88. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Severin-Engelmann/publication/353602055_Blacklists_and_Redlists_in_the_Chinese_Social_Credit_System_Diversity_Flexibility_and_Comprehensiveness/links/6107d8d91ca20f6f86f2cff9/Blacklists-and-Redlists-in-the-Chinese-Social-Credit-System-Diversity-Flexibility-and-Comprehensiveness.pdf

13.

Entman

(1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.

14.

Feldman

(2018) The hostile media effect. In: Kenski

Jamieson

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–18.

15.

Hobbs

Roberts

(2018) How sudden censorship can increase access to information. American Political Science Review 112(3): 621–636.

16.

Huang

Yeh

(2019) Information from abroad: foreign media, selective exposure and political support in China. British Journal of Political Science 49(2): 611–636.

17.

Hussaini

(2020) The historical sources of nationalism in the contemporary China. Technium Social Sciences Journal 13: 536–550.

18.

Kobie

(2019) The complicated truth about China’s social credit system. Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/china-social-credit-system-explained (accessed 26 June 2023).

19.

Kostka

(2019) China’s social credit systems and public opinion: explaining high levels of approval. New Media & Society 21(7): 1565–1593.

20.

Krueger

Best

Johnson

(2020) Assessing dimensions of the security-liberty trade-off in the United States. Surveillance & Society 18(1): 104–120.

21.

Kostka

(2022) Accepting but not engaging with it: digital participation in local government-run social credit systems in China. Policy & Internet 14(4): 845–874.

22.

Liang

Chen

(2022) The making of “good” citizens: China’s Social Credit Systems and infrastructures of social quantification. Policy & Internet 14(1): 114–135.

23.

Liang

Das

Kostyuk

, et al. (2018) Constructing a data-driven society: China’s Social Credit System as a state surveillance infrastructure. Policy & Internet 10(4): 415–453.

24.

Liu

(2019) Multiple social credit systems in China. Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter 21(1): 22–32.

25.

Liu

(2021) Who supports expanding surveillance? exploring public opinion of Chinese social credit systems. International Sociology 37: 391–412.

26.

Mac Síthigh

Siems

(2019) The Chinese social credit system: a model for other countries? The Modern Law Review 82(6): 1034–1071.

27.

Mosher

(2019) China’s new “Social Credit System” is a dystopian nightmare. New York Post. Available at: https://nypost.com/2019/05/18/chinas-new-social-credit-system-turns-orwells-1984-into-reality/ (accessed 26 June 2023).

28.

Nelson

Oxley

Clawson

(1997) Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior 19: 221–246.

29.

Ohlberg

Ahmed

Lang

(2017) Central planning, local experiments. Merics China Monitor. Available at: https://www.merics.org/sites/default/files/2017-12/171212_China_Monitor_43_Social_Credit_System_Implementation.pdf (accessed 26 June 2023).

30.

Reid

(2012) A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication 62(3): 381–399.

31.

Reilly

Lyu

Robertson

(2021) China’s Social Credit System: speculation vs. reality. The Diplomat. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2021/03/chinas-social-credit-system-speculation-vs-reality/ (accessed 26 June 2023).

32.

Shahin

Zheng

(2020) Big data and the illusion of choice: comparing the evolution of India’s Aadhaar and China’s Social Credit System as technosocial discourses. Social Science Computer Review 38(1): 25–41.

33.

Song

(2018) The West may be wrong about China’s social credit system. Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/11/29/social-credit/ (accessed 26 June 2023).

34.

Vallone

Ross

Lepper

(1985) The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 49(3): 585–577.

35.

Von Blomberg

(2020) The Social Credit System and China’s rule of law. In: Everling

(ed.) Social Credit Rating: Reputation Und Vertrauen Beurteilen. London: Springer, pp. 78–112.

36.

Zhang

(2022) Exploring the effects of traditional media, social media and foreign media on hierarchical levels of political trust in China. Global Media & China 7(3): 357–377.

37.

Kostka

Cao

(2021) Information control and public support for Social Credit Systems in China. The Journal of Politics 84: 1–36.

38.

Zhang

(2017) Social media, public discourse and civic engagement in modern China. Telematics & Informatics 34(3): 705–714.

39.

Zou

(2021) Disenchanting trust: instrumental reason, algorithmic governance, and China’s emerging Social Credit System. Media & Communication 9(2): 140–149.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB