Although China’s social credit system (SCS) is widely portrayed by Western media as repressive surveillance, recent studies show that it receives high levels of support among Chinese citizens. Previous research suggests that people support the SCS because they lack knowledge about the system. This study further examines the roles of media framing (Western vs Chinese framing) and monitored behaviors (financial vs social behaviors). The results from a survey experiment conducted in China (N = 1600) demonstrate that when exposed to Western framing, public support for the SCS is lower, but only when participants are informed that the SCS monitors social behavior. By contrast, when people are told that the SCS focuses on financial behavior, Western framing exposure is not associated with low levels of public support. The findings suggest that an expansion to social domains and exposure to Western media framing will likely result in decreased support for the system.
ChenMEngelmannSGrossklagsJ (2022) Ordinary people as moral heroes and foes: digital role Model narratives propagate social norms in China’s Social Credit System. In: Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, & society, pp. 181–191. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3514094.3534180
5.
ChenYCheungAS (2017) The transparent self under big data profiling: privacy and Chinese legislation on the Social Credit System. Journal of Comparative Law12: 356–378.
6.
CheungASChenY (2022) From datafication to data state: making sense of China’s Social Credit System and its implications. Law & Social Inquiry47(4): 1137–1171.
DaiX (2020) Enforcing law and norms for good citizens: one view of China’s Social Credit System project. Development63(1): 38–43.
10.
DingXZhongDY (2021) Rethinking China’s Social Credit System: a long road to establishing trust in Chinese society. Journal of Contemporary China30(130): 630–644.
11.
ElkinsZSidesJ (2007) Can institutions build unity in multiethnic states?American Political Science Review101(4): 693–708.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
14.
FeldmanL (2018) The hostile media effect. In: KenskiKJamiesonKH (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–18.
15.
HobbsWRRobertsME (2018) How sudden censorship can increase access to information. American Political Science Review112(3): 621–636.
16.
HuangHYehYY (2019) Information from abroad: foreign media, selective exposure and political support in China. British Journal of Political Science49(2): 611–636.
17.
HussainiM (2020) The historical sources of nationalism in the contemporary China. Technium Social Sciences Journal13: 536–550.
KostkaG (2019) China’s social credit systems and public opinion: explaining high levels of approval. New Media & Society21(7): 1565–1593.
20.
KruegerBSBestSJJohnsonK (2020) Assessing dimensions of the security-liberty trade-off in the United States. Surveillance & Society18(1): 104–120.
21.
LiHKostkaG (2022) Accepting but not engaging with it: digital participation in local government-run social credit systems in China. Policy & Internet14(4): 845–874.
22.
LiangFChenY (2022) The making of “good” citizens: China’s Social Credit Systems and infrastructures of social quantification. Policy & Internet14(1): 114–135.
23.
LiangFDasVKostyukN, et al. (2018) Constructing a data-driven society: China’s Social Credit System as a state surveillance infrastructure. Policy & Internet10(4): 415–453.
24.
LiuC (2019) Multiple social credit systems in China. Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter21(1): 22–32.
25.
LiuC (2021) Who supports expanding surveillance? exploring public opinion of Chinese social credit systems. International Sociology37: 391–412.
26.
Mac SíthighDSiemsM (2019) The Chinese social credit system: a model for other countries?The Modern Law Review82(6): 1034–1071.
ShahinSZhengP (2020) Big data and the illusion of choice: comparing the evolution of India’s Aadhaar and China’s Social Credit System as technosocial discourses. Social Science Computer Review38(1): 25–41.
ValloneRPRossLLepperMR (1985) The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology49(3): 585–577.
35.
Von BlombergM (2020) The Social Credit System and China’s rule of law. In: EverlingO (ed.) Social Credit Rating: Reputation Und Vertrauen Beurteilen. London: Springer, pp. 78–112.
36.
XuPYeYZhangM (2022) Exploring the effects of traditional media, social media and foreign media on hierarchical levels of political trust in China. Global Media & China7(3): 357–377.
37.
XuXKostkaGCaoX (2021) Information control and public support for Social Credit Systems in China. The Journal of Politics84: 1–36.
38.
YeYXuPZhangM (2017) Social media, public discourse and civic engagement in modern China. Telematics & Informatics34(3): 705–714.
39.
ZouS (2021) Disenchanting trust: instrumental reason, algorithmic governance, and China’s emerging Social Credit System. Media & Communication9(2): 140–149.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
