News outlets rely on social media to freely distribute content, offering a venue for users to comment on news. This exposes individuals to user comments prior to reading news articles, which can influence perceptions of news content. A 2 × 2 between-subject experiment (N = 690) tested the hostile media bias theory via the influence of comments seen before viewing a news story on perceptions of bias and credibility. Results show that user comments induce hostile media perceptions.
CaslerK.BickelL.HackettE. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
2.
ChungM.MunnoG. J.MoritzB. (2015). Triggering participation: Exploring the effects of third-person and hostile media perceptions on online participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.037
3.
CoeK.TewksburyD.BondB. J.DrogosK. L.PorterR. W.YahnA.ZhangY. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cable news programming. Journal of Communication, 58, 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00381.x
4.
DaltonR. J.BeckP. A.HuckfeldtR. (1998). Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 presidential election. The American Political Science Review, 92, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585932
FeldmanL. (2011). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33, 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4
GearhartS.MoeA.ZhangB. (2020). Hostile media bias on social media: Testing the effect of user comments on perceptions of news bias and credibility. Human Behavior & Emerging Technologies, 2, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.185
12.
Giner-SorollaR.ChaikenS. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1008
GuntherA. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1086/269308
15.
HansenG. J.KimH. (2011). Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Communication Research Reports, 28(2), 169–179.
16.
HoustonJ. B.HansenG. J.NisbettG. S. (2011). Influence of user comments on perceptions of media bias and third person effect in online news. Electronic News, 5(2), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243111407618
JuA.JeongS. H.ChyiH. I. (2014). Will social media save newspapers? Examining the effectiveness of Facebook and Twitter as news platforms. Journalism Practice, 8, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.794022
20.
KimK. S.PasadeosY. (2007). Study of partisan news readers reveals hostile media perceptions of balanced news stories. Newspaper Research Journal, 28(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290702800207
21.
KimM. (2015). Partisans and controversial news online: Comparing perceptions of bias and credibility in news content from blogs and mainstream media. Mass Communication & Society, 18, 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.877486
KümpelA. S.UnkelJ. (2020). Negativity wins at last: How presentation order and valence of user comments affect perceptions of journalistic quality. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, & Applications, 32(2), 89–99.https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000261
24.
LeeE.-J. (2012). That’s not the way it is: How user-generated comments on the news affect perceived media bias. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01597.x
25.
LeeE.-J.TandocE. C.Jr. (2017). When news meets the audience: How audience feedback online affects news production and consumption. Human Communication Research, 43, 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12123
26.
LordC. G.RossL.LepperM. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
27.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
PerloffR. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016002004
PjesivacI.GeidnerN.CameronJ. (2018). Social credibility online: The role of online comments in assessing news article credibility. Newspaper Research Journal, 39(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532918761065
RoweI. (2015). Deliberation 2.0: Comparing the deliberative quality of online news user comments across platforms. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1093482
ShoemakerP. J.TankardJ. W.LasorsaD. L. (2004). How to build social science theories. SAGE.
46.
ValloneR. P.RossL.LepperM. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 49, 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
WaddellT. F. (2018). What does the crowd think? How online comments and popularity metrics affect news credibility and issue importance. New Media & Society, 20, 3068–3083. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817742905
49.
WaltherJ. B.DeAndreaD.KimJ.AnthonyJ. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36, 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x
50.
WinterS.BrücknerC.KrämerN. C. (2015). They came, they liked, they commented: Social influence on Facebook news channels. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 18, 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0005
51.
WittemanH. O.FagerlinA.ExeN.TrottierM. E.Zikmund-FisherB. J. (2016). One-sided social media comments influence opinions and intentions about home birth: An experimental study. Health Affairs, 35, 726–733. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1382
52.
YunG. W.ParkS.-Y.LeeS.FlynnM. A. (2018). Hostile media or hostile source? Bias perception of shared news. Social Science Computer Review, 36(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316684481