A board of one’s own: Interviewing the anonymous female imageboard community

Abstract

This article examines the experiences of female users of imageboards – online anonymous-by-default bulletin boards. Using thematic analysis on 12 Instant Messaging (IM)–based interviews with female-identifying imageboard users, this study gathers and presents their experiences and perceptions of benefits and drawbacks of use. Major findings include negative perception of mainstream imageboards and a contrastingly positive sentiment towards the platforms investigated as part of this study. Using imageboards represented a unique, entertaining and social experience. Interviewees predominantly used imageboards to be hyperbolic, ‘vent’, discuss sexuality or explore thoughts they otherwise would not. The study’s findings question previous narratives of women on imageboards which position them either as mostly unaffected members of the space or as out-of-place minorities ‘getting by’ – by virtue of using masculinist strategies. Rather, participants describe ambivalent experiences around navigating these spaces, including benefits of entertainment, sense of belonging and the affinity towards gendered self-experimentation.

Keywords

anonymity gender instant messaging interview privacy social media women xenofeminism 4chan 8chan

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

4chan (n.d.-a) /b/ – random. Available at: boards.4chan.org/b/ (accessed 9 February 2022).

4chan (n.d.-b) Advertise – 4chan. Available at: www.4chan.org/advertise (accessed 9 February 2022).

Albrechtslund

(2008) Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday. Epub ahead of print 13 March. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142.

Anonymous (2009) Rules of the internet. Available at: www.archive.org/stream/RulesOfTheInternet/RulesOfTheInternet.txt (accessed 17 February 2022).

Arthur

(2019) We analyzed more than 1 million comments on 4chan. Hate speech there has spiked by 40% since 2015. VICE News, 10 June. Available at: www.vice.com/en/article/d3nbzy/we-analyzed-more-than-1-million-comments-on-4chan-hate-speech-there-has-spiked-by-40-since-2015 (accessed 17 February 2022).

Auerbach

(2012) Anonymity as culture: treatise. Triple Canopy 15(1). Available at: www.canopycanopycanopy.com/contents/anonymity_as_culture__treatise (accessed 17 February 2022).

Bach

Tsapatsaris

Szpirt

, et al. (2018) The baker’s guild: the secret order countering 4chan’s affordances. In: OILab – Open Intelligence Lab. Available at: www.oilab.eu/the-bakers-guild-the-secret-order-countering-4chans-affordances (accessed 19 February 2022).

Baele

Brace

Coan

(2021a) From ‘incel’ to ‘saint’: analyzing the violent worldview behind the 2018 Toronto attack. Terrorism and Political Violence 33(8): 1667–1691.

Baele

Brace

Coan

(2021b) Variations on a theme? Comparing 4chan, 8kun, and other chans’ far-right ‘/pol’ boards. Perspectives on Terrorism 15(1): 65–80.

10.

Bart

(2021) The gamification of ‘lone wolf’ terrorism on 4chan and 8chan. In: OILab – Open Intelligence Lab. Available at: www.oilab.eu/the-gamification-of-lone-wolf-terrorism-on-4chan-and-8chan (accessed 19 February 2022).

11.

Bernstein

Monroy-Hernández

Harry

, et al. (2021) 4chan and /b/: an analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. In: Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Barcelona, 17–21 July, Vol. 5(1), pp. 50–57. Available at: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14134 (accessed 4 February 2022).

12.

Black

Mezzina

Thompson

(2016) Anonymous social media – understanding the content and context of Yik Yak. Computers in Human Behavior 57: 17–22.

13.

Bodle

(2011a) Privacy and participation in the cloud: ethical implications of Google’s privacy practices and public communications. In: German

Drushel

(eds) The Ethics of Emerging Media: Information, Social Norms, and New Media Technology. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group, pp. 155–174.

14.

Bodle

(2011b) Regimes of sharing: open APIs, interoperability, and Facebook. Information, Communication & Society 14(3): 320–337.

15.

Bodle

(2013) The ethics of online anonymity or Zuckerberg vs. ‘MOOT’. Computers and Society 43(1): 22–35.

16.

Booth

(2010) Digital Fandom: New Media Studies. Berlin: Peter Lang.

17.

Bourdieu

(1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18.

boyd

(2010) ‘for the lolz’: 4chan is hacking the attention economy. In: Apophenia. Available at: www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2010/06/12/for-the-lolz-4chan-is-hacking-the-attention-economy.html (accessed 4 January 2022).

19.

Braithwaite

(2016) It’s about ethics in games journalism? Gamergaters and geek masculinity. Social Media + Society. Epub ahead of print 7 October. DOI: 10.1177/2056305116672484.

20.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

21.

Brinkmann

Kvale

(2015) Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

22.

Brown

(2004) Women & Shame: Reaching Out, Speaking Truths & Building Connection. Austin, TX: 3C Press.

23.

Cohen

(2013) What privacy is for. Harvard Law Review 126(7): 1904–1933.

24.

Colley

Moore

(2020) The challenges of studying 4chan and the Alt-Right: ‘come on in the water’s fine’. New Media and Society 24(1): 5–30.

25.

Constant

Sproull

Kiesler

(1996) The kindness of strangers: the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science 7(2): 119–135.

26.

Correa

Silva

Mondal

, et al. (2015) The many shades of anonymity: characterizing anonymous social media content. In: Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Oxford, 26–29 May, Vol. 9(1), pp. 71–80. Available at: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14635 (accessed 17 February 2022).

27.

Crawford

Keen

Suarez de-Tangil

(2020) Memetic irony and the promotion of violence within chan cultures. Report, Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats, Lancaster, 15 December. Available at: www.crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/memetic-irony-and-the-promotion-of-violence-within-chan-cultures/ (accessed 4 February 2022).

28.

Cuboniks

(2018) Xenofeminism: a politics for alienation. Available at: www.laboriacuboniks.net/manifesto/xenofeminism-a-politics-for-alienation/ (accessed 10 December 2021).

29.

Danet

(1998) Text as mask: gender, play, and performance on the internet. In: Jones

(ed.) Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 129–158.

30.

De Keulenaar

(2018a) Freedom and taboos in the international ghettos of the web. In: OILab – Open Intelligence Lab. Available at: www.oilab.eu/freedom-and-taboos-in-the-international-chanosphere (accessed 17 February 2022).

31.

De Keulenaar

(2018b) The rise and fall of Kekistan: a story of idiomatic animus as told through Youtube’s related videos. In: OILab – Open Intelligence Lab. Available at: www.oilab.eu/the-rise-and-fall-of-kekistan-a-story-of-idiomatic-animus-as-told-through-the-youtube-recommender-system (accessed 17 February 2022).

32.

De Zeeuw

(2019) Between mass and mask: the profane media logic of anonymous imageboard culture. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

33.

Dobson

(2015) Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media, and Self-representation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

34.

Donath

(1999) Identity and deception in the virtual community. In: Smith

Kollock

(eds) Communities in cyberspace. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 29–59.

35.

Everbach

Vickery

(2018) Mediating Misogyny: Gender, Technology, and Harassment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

36.

Fathallah

(2021) Getting by on 4chan: feminine self-presentation and capital-claiming in antifeminist web space. First Monday. Epub ahead of print 7 June. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v26i7.10449.

37.

Fujii

(2018) Interviewing in Social Science Research: A Relational Approach. New York: Taylor & Francis.

38.

Gonzales

(2019) 8chan, 8kun, 4chan, Endchan: what you need to know. CNET, 7 November. Available at: www.cnet.com/news/8chan-8kun-4chan-endchan-what-you-need-to-know-internet-forums/ (accessed 17 February 2022).

39.

Hagen

(2018a) 4chan/pol/ image walls: themes. In: OILab – Open Intelligence Lab. Available at: www.oilab.eu/4chanpol-image-walls-themes/ (accessed 17 February 2022).

40.

Hagen

(2018b) 4chan/pol/ image walls: memes. In: OILab – Open Intelligence Lab. Available at: www.oilab.eu/4chanpol-image-walls-memes/ (accessed 17 February 2022).

41.

Hagen

(2018c) ‘Deus vult!’: tracing the many (mis)uses of a meme. In: OILab – Open Intelligence Lab. Available at: www.oilab.eu/deus-vult-tracing-the-many-misuses-of-a-meme/ (accessed 17 February 2022).

42.

Hagen

(2022) ‘Who is/ourguy/?’ tracing panoramic memes to study the collectivity of 4chan/pol. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 9 February 2022. DOI: 14614448221078274.

43.

Haraway

(2016) A cyborg manifesto. In: Haraway

Wolfe

(eds) Manifestly Haraway. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–90.

44.

Harcourt

(1999) Women@internet: Creating New Cultures in Cyberspace. London: Zed Books.

45.

Hargrave

(2017) The myth of the anonymous troll. In: Lewis

(ed.) Queer Privacy: Essays from the Margins of Society. Victoria, BC, Canada: Leanpub, pp. 42–48.

46.

Hine

Onaolapo

De Cristofaro

, et al. (2017) Kek, cucks, and god emperor trump: a measurement study of 4chan’s politically incorrect forum and its effects on the web. In: 11th international AAAI conference on web and social media, Montréal, QC, Canada, 15–18 May, pp. 92–102. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.

47.

Knuttila

(2011) User unknown: 4chan, anonymity and contingency. First Monday. Epub ahead of print 19 September. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v16i10.3665.

48.

Lee

(2021) ‘You betrayed us’: ethnic celebrity gossip in diasporic women’s online communities. Convergence. Epub ahead of print 10 May. DOI: 10.1177/13548565211013183.

49.

Lewis

(2017) What is queer privacy? In: Lewis

(ed.) Queer Privacy: Essays from the Margins of Society. Victoria, BC, Canada: Leanpub, pp. 1–4.

50.

Lorentzen

Shakir

(2020) The anti-feminism of the far-right imageboard terrorists. Conjunctions – Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation 7(1): 1–8.

51.

Manivannan

(2012) Attaining the ninth square: cybertextuality, gamification, and institutional memory on 4chan. Enculturation 14: 1–21.

52.

Manivannan

(2013) FCJ-158 tits or GTFO: the logics of misogyny on 4chan’s random – /b. Fibreculture Journal 22: 108–131.

53.

Mann

(2018) Femininity, shame, and redemption. Hypatia 33(3): 402–417.

54.

Massanari

(2017) #Gamergate and the fappening: how Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media and Society 19(3): 329–346.

55.

Milner

(2016) The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

56.

Nagle

(2016) The new man of 4chan. The Baffler, 30 March. Available at: https://thebaffler.com/salvos/new-man-4chan-nagle

57.

Nagle

(2017) Kill All Normies: The Online Culture Wars from Tumblr and 4chan to the Alt-Right and Trump. Alresford: Zero Books.

58.

Nissenbaum

Shifman

(2017) Internet memes as contested cultural capital: the case of 4chan’s /b/ board. New Media & Society 19(4): 483–501.

59.

Oakley

(2000) Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.

60.

Parker

(2005) Qualitative Psychology: Introducing Radical Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

61.

Patton

(1982) Practical Evaluation. London: SAGE Publications.

62.

Peddinti

Ross

Cappos

(2014) ‘On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog’: a twitter case study of anonymity in social networks. In: COSN 2014 – proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on online social networks, Dublin, 1–2 October, pp. 83–93. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

63.

Phillips

(2013) The house that fox built: anonymous, spectacle, and cycles of amplification. Television & New Media 14(6): 494–509.

64.

Phillips

Milner

(2017) The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online. Cambridge: Polity Press.

65.

Poland

(2016) Haters: Harassment, Abuse, and Violence Online. Lincoln, OR: Potomac Books.

66.

Postmes

Spears

(1998) Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 123(3): 238–259.

67.

Rheingold

(2012) Net Smart: How to Thrive Online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

68.

Saldaña

(2016) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications.

69.

Salter

(2018) From geek masculinity to Gamergate: the technological rationality of online abuse. Crime, Media, Culture 14(2): 247–264.

70.

Sardá

Natale

Sotirakopoulos

, et al. (2019) Understanding online anonymity. Media, Culture and Society 41(4): 557–564.

71.

Solove

(2010) Speech, privacy, and reputation on the internet. In: Levmore

Nussbaum

(eds) The Offensive Internet: Speech, Privacy, and Reputation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 15–30.

72.

Song

(2009) Virtual Communities: Bowling Alone, Online Together. Berlin: Peter Lang.

73.

Sparby

(2017) Digital social media and aggression: memetic rhetoric in 4chan’s collective identity. Computers and Composition 45: 85–97.

74.

Stieger

Göritz

(2006) Using instant messaging for internet-based interviews. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 9(5): 552–559.

75.

Suler

(2005) The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 2(2): 84–188.

76.

Taylor

(2007) Book review: the future of reputation. In: Prettier than Napoleon. Available at: http://bamber.blogspot.com/2007/11/partial-book-review-future-of.html (accessed 6 February 2022).

77.

Trammell

(2014) User investment and behavior policing on 4chan. First Monday. Epub ahead of print 3 February. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v19i2.4819.

78.

Turkle

(1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

79.

Tuters

(2020) The birth of QAnon: on how 4chan invents a conspiracy theory. In: OILab – Open Intelligence Lab. Available at: www.oilab.eu/the-birth-of-qanon-on-how-4chan-invents-a-conspiracy-theory (accessed 4 February 2022).

80.

Tuters

Hagen

(2018) Who are (((they)))?: on online hate, tasteless transgression, and memetic versatility. In: OILab – Open Intelligence Lab. Available at: oilab.eu/who-are-they-on-online-hate-tasteless-transgression-and-memetic-versatility/ (accessed 4 February 2022).

81.

Tuters

Jokubauskaitė

Bach

(2018) Post-truth protest: how 4chan cooked up the Pizzagate bullshit. M/C Journal 21(3): 1422.

82.

Voida

Mynatt

Erickson

, et al. (2004) Interviewing over instant messaging. In: CHI ’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Vienna, 24–29 April, pp. 1344–1347. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

83.

Woolf

(2019) A Room of One’s Own. Richmond: Alma Books.

84.

Ylä-Anttila

Eranti

Hardwick

(2020) Going overboard: how ironic group style becomes political on an anonymous imageboard. Social Media + Society 6(4): 1–11.

85.

Youngs

(1999) Virtual voices: real lives. In: Harcourt

(ed.) Women@Internet: Creating New Cultures in Cyberspace. London: Zed Books, pp. 55–68.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB