This study focuses on the perceptions and practices of anonymous communication with friends enabled by tie-based anonymous apps. Based on qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with users of the application Secret, the strategies deployed by interviewees in order to de-anonymize other users are emphasized and placed within the broader context of the real-name web. The article shows that Secret was not only based on pre-existing social networks but also drew on the network as a structure of thought. The concept of networked anonymity is introduced to account for the ways that anonymous actors imagine one another as “someone,” rather than as an unknown “anyone.” As such, the survivability of this communicative model is inherently limited by competing forces—the drive to connectivity, on the one hand, and to anonymity, on the other.
Anonymous (1998) To reveal or not to reveal: a theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory8: 381–407.
2.
BernsteinMSBakshyEBurkeMet al. (2013) Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Paris, 27 April–2 May, pp. 21–30. New York: ACM.
3.
BernsteinMSMonroy-HernándezAHarryDet al. (2011) 4chan and /b/: an analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. In: Proceeding of the fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, pp. 50–57. Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/viewFile/2873/4398
4.
BirnholtzJMerolaNARPaulA (2015) Is it weird to still be a virgin: anonymous, locally targeted questions on Facebook confession boards. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, 18–23 April, pp. 2613–2622. New York: ACM.
5.
BlackEWMezzinaKThompsonLA (2016) Anonymous social media: understanding the content and context of Yik Yak. Computers in Human Behavior57: 17–22.
6.
boydd (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
boyddEllisonNB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1): 210–230.
CorreaDSilvaLAMondalMet al. (2015) The many shades of anonymity: characterizing anonymous social media content. In: Proceedings of the ninth AAAI international conference on web and social media, Oxford, 26–29 May, pp. 71–80. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
10.
DonathJS (1998) Identity and deception in the virtual community. In: SmithMAKollockP (eds) Communities in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge, pp. 29–59.
11.
EllisonNBboydd (2013) Sociality through social network sites. In: DuttonWH (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–172.
12.
HendersonSGildingM (2004) ‘I’ve never clicked this much with anyone in my life’: trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media & Society6(4): 487–506.
13.
HoganB (2013) Pseudonyms and the rise of the real-name web. In: HartleyJBurgessJBrunsA (eds) A Companion to New Media Dynamics. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 290–308.
14.
JohnNA (2016) The Age of Sharing. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
KangRDabbishLSuttonK (2016) Strangers on your phone: why people use anonymous communication applications. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing, San Francisco, CA, 27 February–2 March, pp. 359–370. New York: ACM.
16.
KennedyH (2006) Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research. New Media & Society8(6): 859–876.
17.
LittEHargittaiE (2016) The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media + Society2(1). DOI: 10.1177/2056305116633482.
18.
MaXAndalibiNBarkhuusLet al. (2017) People are either too fake or too real: opportunities and challenges in tie-based anonymity. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, CO, 6–11 May, pp. 1781–1793. New York: ACM.
19.
MaXHancockJNaamanM (2016) Anonymity, intimacy and self-disclosure in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, 7–12 May 2016, pp. 3857–3869. Available at: https://s.tech.cornell.edu/assets/papers/anonymity-intimacy-disclosure.pdf
20.
MarxGT (1999) What’s in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. Information Society15(2): 99–112.
21.
MooreMJNakanoTEnomotoAet al. (2012) Anonymity and roles associated with aggressive posts in an online forum. Computers in Human Behavior28(3): 861–867.
22.
NissenbaumH (1999) The meaning of anonymity in an information age. Information Society15(2): 141–144.
23.
PanditNR (1996) The creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method. The Qualitative Report2(4): 1–15.
24.
PapacharissiZ (2002) The virtual sphere the internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society4(1): 9–27.
25.
QianHScottCR (2007) Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1428–1451.
26.
RainsSA (2007) The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication. Communication Research34(1): 100–125.
27.
RubinZ (1975) Disclosing oneself to a stranger: reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology11(3): 233–260.
ScottCR (2004) Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: legal challenges and communicative recommendations. Free Speech Yearbook41(1): 127–141.
30.
SilvaLAMondalMCorreaDet al. (2016) Analyzing the targets of hate in online social media. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on web and social media, Cologne, 17–20 May, pp. 687–690. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
31.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
SulerJ (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior7(3): 321–326.
33.
TurkleS (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
34.
Van Der NagelE (2017) From usernames to profiles: the development of pseudonymity in Internet communication. Internet Histories1(4): 312–331.
35.
Van Der NagelEFrithJ (2015) Anonymity, pseudonymity, and the agency of online Identity: examining the social practices of r/gonewild. First Monday20(3). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v20i3.5615.
36.
Van DijckJ (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
WallaceKA (1999) Anonymity. Ethics and Information Technology1(1): 21–31.
38.
WangGWangBWangTet al. (2014) Whispers in the dark: analysis of an anonymous social network. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on internet measurement conference Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5–7 November, pp. 137–150. New York: ACM.
