What do 5G networks,Bill Gates,Agenda 21,and QAnon have in common? Sources,distribution,and characteristics

Abstract

Mounting uncertainties regarding the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and the popularity of social media created fertile grounds for conspiracy theories to flourish, leading to a global “infodemic.” We examine information sources used to support five popular COVID-19-related conspiracy theories on Twitter to identify (1) their primary building blocks, (2) similarities and dissimilarities across COVID-19 conspiracy theories, and (3) the relationship between type of message content and content distribution. Findings show that statements of belief and of malicious purpose were most popular, followed by conspirators, authentication, and secretive actions. However, only malicious purposes and secretive actions messages successfully predicted higher distribution of content, while, for instance, content authentication showed a negative relation. Furthermore, the type of conspiracy theories matters. Mega-theories, such as Agenda 21 and QAnon, incorporated less statements of Belief. COVID-19 vaccine–related theories focused more on authentication, while QAnon highlighted the conspirators behind the pandemic. Conceptual and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords

Conspiracy theories COVID-19 type of message content

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamic

Glance

(2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on link discovery, Chicago, IL, 21–25 August, pp. 36–43. New York: ACM.

Ahmed

Segui

Vidal-Alaball

, et al. (2020) COVID-19 and the “film your hospital” conspiracy theory: social network analysis of twitter data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22(10): e22374.

Ahmed

Vidal-Alaball

Downing

, et al. (2020) Dangerous messages or satire? Analysing the conspiracy theory linking 5G to covid-19 through social network analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22(5): e19458.

Allington

Duffy

Wessely

, et al. (2021) Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine 51: 1763–1769. DOI: 10.1017/S003329172000224X.

Astapova

(2020) Rumours, urban legends and the verbal transmission of conspiracy theories. In: Butter

Knight

(eds) Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. London: Routledge, pp. 391–400.

Barabási

Albert

(1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439): 509–512.

Bodner

Welch

Brodie

(2020) COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories: Qanon, 5G, the New World Order and Other Viral Ideas. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

Bordia

DiFonzo

(2004) Problem solving in social interactions on the Internet: rumor as social cognition. Social Psychology Quarterly 67(1): 33–49.

Bordia

Rosnow

(1998) Rumor rest stops on the information highway transmission patterns in a computer-mediated rumor chain. Human Communication Research 25(2): 163–179.

10.

Bovet

Makse

(2019) Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nature Communications 10(7): 1–14.

11.

Bruns

Harrington

Hurcombe

(2020) ‘Corona? 5G? or both?’: the dynamics of COVID-19/5G conspiracy theories on Facebook. Media International Australia 177(1): 12–29.

12.

Butter

Knight

(eds) (2020) Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. New York: Routledge.

13.

Carlson

(2020) We were lied to about coronavirus and the mass lockdowns. Here’s the proof. Available at: www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-we-were-lied-to-about-coronavirus-and-the-mass-lockdowns-heres-the-proof (accessed 7 July 2021).

14.

Chew

Eysenbach

(2010) Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS ONE 5(11): e14118.

15.

Cinelli

Etta

Avalle

, et al. (2022) Conspiracy theories and social media platforms. Current Opinion in Psychology 101407. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101407.

16.

Citizen

(2020) Bill Gates calls for a “digital certificate” to identify who received Covid-19 vaccine. Available at: vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/bill-gates-calls-for-a-digital-certificate-to-identify-who-is-vaccinated/ (accessed 1 July 2021).

17.

Craft

Ashley

Maksl

(2017) News media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement. Communication and the Public 2(4): 388–401.

18.

DiFonzo

Bordia

(2007) Rumor, gossip and urban legends. Diogenes 54(1): 19–35.

19.

DiMaggio

(2022) Conspiracy theories and the manufacture of dissent: QAnon, the “Big Lie,” covid-19, and the rise of rightwing propaganda. Critical Sociology 48: 1025–1048.

20.

Douglas

Sutton

(2011) Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology 50(3): 544–552.

21.

Douglas

Uscinski

Sutton

, et al. (2019) Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology 40(Suppl. 1): 3–35.

22.

Doyon (2020) China’s massive amount of immunotoxic 5G networking and the Wuhan coronavirus: the Emperor’s new virus. Available at: freepress.org/article/china%E2%80%99s-massive-amount-immunotoxic-5g-networking-and-wuhan-coronavirus-emperor%E2%80%99s-new-virus (accessed 3 July 2021).

23.

Evstatieva

(2020) Anatomy of a COVID-19 conspiracy theory. NPR. Available at: https://www.npr.org/2020/07/10/889037310/anatomy-of-a-covid-19-conspiracy-theory?t=1595434430326

24.

Featherstone

Ruiz

Barnett

, et al. (2020) Exploring childhood vaccination themes and public opinions on Twitter: a semantic network analysis. Telematics and Informatics 54: 101–474.

25.

Federico

Williams

Vitriol

(2018) The role of system identity threat in conspiracy theory endorsement. European Journal of Social Psychology 48(7): 927–938.

26.

Franks

Bangerter

Bauer

(2013) Conspiracy theories as quasi-religious mentality: an integrated account from cognitive science, social representations theory, and frame theory. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 424.

27.

Fung

Chan

, et al. (2016) Social media’s initial reaction to information and misinformation on Ebola, August 2014: Facts and rumors. Public Health Reports 131: 461–473.

28.

Gazette

(2020) Coronavirus vaccine comes with Norfolk genes side effect warning. Available at: www.suffolkgazette.com/news/coronavirus-norfolk-vaccine/ (accessed 3 July 2021).

29.

Ghenai

Mejova

(2017) Catching Zika fever: application of crowdsourcing and machine learning for tracking health misinformation on Twitter. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on healthcare informatics (ICHI), Park City, UT, 23–26 August, pp. 518–518. New York: IEEE.

30.

Ginossar

Cruickshank

Zheleva

, et al. (2022) Cross-platform spread: vaccine-related content, sources, and conspiracy theories in YouTube videos shared in early Twitter COVID-19 conversations. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 18(1): 1–13.

31.

Goreis

Kothgassner

(2020) Social media as vehicle for conspiracy beliefs on COVID-19. Digital Psychology 1(2): 36–39.

32.

Haupt

Jinich-Diamant

, et al. (2021) Characterizing twitter user topics and communication network dynamics of the “liberate” movement during COVID-19 using unsupervised machine learning and social network analysis. Online Social Networks and Media 21: 100114.

33.

Heilweil

(2020) How the 5G coronavirus conspiracy theory went from fringe to mainstream. Available at: https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/4/24/21231085/coronavirus-5g-conspiracy-theory-covid-facebook-youtube

34.

Himelboim

(2017) Social network analysis (social media). In: Matthes

(ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. London: Wiley, pp. 1–15.

35.

Hodges

(2014) The nightmarish megacities of the near future. Available at: agenda21news.com/2014/08/nightmarish-megacities-near-future/ (accessed 5 July 2021).

36.

Hodges

(2020a) The coronavirus is actually the 2nd attempt to use the virus as a pretext to install extreme martial law-what did we learn the 1st time? Available at: thecommonsenseshow.com/agenda-21-conspiracy-economics/coronavirus-actually-2nd-attempt-use-virus-pretext-install-extreme-martial-law-what-did-we-learn (accessed 7 July 2021).

37.

Hodges

(2020b) Have three bioweapons unleashed on the United States? Available at: thecommonsenseshow.com/agenda-21-conspiracy-economics/have-three-bioweapons-unleashed-united-states (accessed 27 June 2021).

38.

Huff (2020) Bill Gates paralyzed half a million children with polio vaccines—do we really want him vaccinating the world for coronavirus? Available at: www.dcclothesline.com/2020/04/30/bill-gates-paralyzed-half-a-million-children-with-polio-vaccines-do-we-really-want-him-vaccinating-the-world-for-coronavirus/ (accessed 21 June 2021).

39.

Imhoff

Lamberty

(2020) A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science 11(8): 1110–1118.

40.

Imhoff

Zimmer

Klein

, et al. (2022) Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nature Human Behaviour 6(3): 392–403.

41.

Jang

Kim

(2018) Third person effects of fake news: fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior 80: 295–302.

42.

Keib

Himelboim

Han

(2018) Important tweets matter: predicting retweets in the #blacklivesmatter talk on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior 85: 106–115.

43.

Kou

Gui

Chen

, et al. (2017) Conspiracy talk on social media: collective sensemaking during a public health crisis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1(CSCW): 61.

44.

Kuklinski

Quirk

Jerit

, et al. (2000) Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. Journal of Politics 62(3): 790–816.

45.

Larson

Jarrett

Eckersberger

, et al. (2014) Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine 32(19): 2150–2159.

46.

Lazer

DMJ

Baum

Benkler

, et al. (2018) The science of fake news. Science 359(6380): 1094–1096.

47.

Lyons-Weiler

(2020) Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity. Journal of Translational Autoimmunity 3: 100051. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2020.100051.

48.

Mahl

Zeng

Schäfer

(2021) From “Nasa Lies” to “Reptilian Eyes”: mapping communication about 10 conspiracy theories, their communities, and main propagators on Twitter. Social Media+Society 7(2). DOI: 10.1177/20563051211017482.

49.

McBreen

(2020) Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation & others predicted up to 65 million deaths via coronavirus—In simulation ran 3 months ago!.

50.

McHugh

Saperstein

Gold

(2019) OMG U# cyberbully! An exploration of public discourse about cyberbullying on Twitter. Health Education & Behavior 46(1): 97–105.

51.

Marcks

Pawelz

(2020) From myths of victimhood to fantasies of violence: How far-right narratives of imperilment work. Terrorism and Political Violence 34: 1415–1432.

52.

Maria

Zaid

Catrin

, et al. (2020) The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. International Journal of Surgery 78: 185–193.

53.

Miller

Saunders

Farhart

(2016) Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: the moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science 60(4): 824–844.

54.

Min

(2021) Who believes in conspiracy theories? Network diversity, political discussion, and conservative conspiracy theories on social media. American Politics Research 49(5): 415–427.

55.

Naveed

Gottron

Kunegis

, et al. (2011) Bad news travel fast: a content-based analysis of interestingness on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international web science conference, Koblenz, 15–17 June, pp. 1–7. New York: ACM.

56.

Indran

Liu

(2022) A playbook for effective age advocacy on Twitter. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 70: 2363–2370.

57.

Oberhauser

(2020) Freemasons, illuminati and jews: conspiracy theories and the French revolution. In: Butter

Knight

(eds) Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. New York: Routledge, pp. 555–568.

58.

Prooijen

Douglas

(2017) Conspiracy theories as part of history: the role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies 10(3): 323–333.

59.

Shahsavari

Holur

Wang

, et al. (2020) Conspiracy in the time of corona: automatic detection of emerging COVID-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news. Journal of Computational Social Science 3(2): 279–317. DOI: 10.1007/s42001-020-00086-5.

60.

Shin

Jian

Driscoll

, et al. (2018) The diffusion of misinformation on social media: temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior 83: 278–287.

61.

Singh

Bode

Budak

, et al. (2020) Understanding high-and low-quality URL sharing on COVID-19 Twitter streams. Journal of Computational Social Science 3(2): 343–366.

62.

Smallpage

Drochon

Uscinski

, et al. (2020) Who are the conspiracy theorists? Demographics and conspiracy theories. In: Butter

Knight

(eds) Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. London: Routledge, pp. 263–277.

63.

Prestin

Lee

, et al. (2016) What do people like to “share” about obesity? A content analysis of frequent retweets about obesity on Twitter. Health Communication 31(2): 193–206.

64.

Starbird

(2017, May). Examining the alternative media ecosystem through the production of alternative narratives of mass shooting events on Twitter. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

65.

Stephens

(2020) A geospatial infodemic: mapping Twitter conspiracy theories of COVID-19. Dialogues in Human Geography 10: 276–281.

66.

Stieb

(2020) QAnon influencers are encouraging their followers to drink bleach to stave off Coronavirus. Intelligencer. Available at: nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/01/qanon-supporters-are-drinking-bleach-to-fend-off-coronavirus.html (accessed 5 July 2021).

67.

Sunstein

Vermeule

(2009) Conspiracy theories: causes and cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 202–227.

68.

Tanaka

Sakamoto

Honda

(2014) The impact of posting URLs in disaster-related tweets on rumor spreading behavior. In: 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa, HI, 6–9 January, pp. 520–529. New York: IEEE.

69.

Tandoc

Lim

Ling

(2020) Diffusion of disinformation: how social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism 21(3): 381–398.

70.

Tandoc

Jr (2019) The facts of fake news: a research review. Sociology Compass 13(9): e12724.

71.

Thelwall

(2020) A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets: consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life. Aslib Journal of Information Management 72(6): 945–962.

72.

United Nations (2020) UN tackles ‘infodemic’ of misinformation and cybercrime in COVID-19 crisis. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/un-coronavirus-communications-team/un-tackling-%E2%80%98infodemic%E2%80%99-misinformation-and-cybercrime-covid-19

73.

Uscinski

(2020) Conspiracy Theories: A Primer. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

74.

Uscinski

Parent

(2014) American Conspiracy Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

75.

Valenzuela

Halpern

Katz

, et al. (2019) The paradox of participation versus misinformation: social media, political engagement, and the spread of misinformation. Digital Journalism 7(6): 802–823.

76.

Vigilant Citizen (2020) Bill Gates calls for a “digital certificate” to identify who received COVID-19 vaccine. Available at: https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/bill-gates-calls-for-a-digital-certificate-to-identify-who-is-vaccinated/ (accessed 2 July 2021).

77.

Vraga

Bode

(2020) Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication 37(1): 136–144.

78.

West

Bergstrom

(2021) Misinformation in and about science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(15): e1912444117.

79.

Wood

(2018) Propagating and debunking conspiracy theories on Twitter during the 2015–2016 Zika virus outbreak. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 21(8): 485–490.

80.

(2022) Evolution of audience duplication networks among social networking sites: exploring the influences of preferential attachment, audience size, and niche width. New Media & Society 24(9): 2068–2087.

81.

Zonis

Joseph

(1994) Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology 15: 443–459.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB