Mounting uncertainties regarding the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and the popularity of social media created fertile grounds for conspiracy theories to flourish, leading to a global “infodemic.” We examine information sources used to support five popular COVID-19-related conspiracy theories on Twitter to identify (1) their primary building blocks, (2) similarities and dissimilarities across COVID-19 conspiracy theories, and (3) the relationship between type of message content and content distribution. Findings show that statements of belief and of malicious purpose were most popular, followed by conspirators, authentication, and secretive actions. However, only malicious purposes and secretive actions messages successfully predicted higher distribution of content, while, for instance, content authentication showed a negative relation. Furthermore, the type of conspiracy theories matters. Mega-theories, such as Agenda 21 and QAnon, incorporated less statements of Belief. COVID-19 vaccine–related theories focused more on authentication, while QAnon highlighted the conspirators behind the pandemic. Conceptual and practical implications are discussed.
AdamicLAGlanceN (2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on link discovery, Chicago, IL, 21–25 August, pp. 36–43. New York: ACM.
2.
AhmedWSeguiFVidal-AlaballJ, et al. (2020) COVID-19 and the “film your hospital” conspiracy theory: social network analysis of twitter data. Journal of Medical Internet Research22(10): e22374.
3.
AhmedWVidal-AlaballJDowningJ, et al. (2020) Dangerous messages or satire? Analysing the conspiracy theory linking 5G to covid-19 through social network analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research22(5): e19458.
4.
AllingtonDDuffyBWesselyS, et al. (2021) Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine51: 1763–1769. DOI: 10.1017/S003329172000224X.
5.
AstapovaA (2020) Rumours, urban legends and the verbal transmission of conspiracy theories. In: ButterMKnightP (eds) Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. London: Routledge, pp. 391–400.
6.
BarabásiALAlbertR (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science286(5439): 509–512.
7.
BodnerJWelchWBrodieI (2020) COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories: Qanon, 5G, the New World Order and Other Viral Ideas. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
8.
BordiaPDiFonzoN (2004) Problem solving in social interactions on the Internet: rumor as social cognition. Social Psychology Quarterly67(1): 33–49.
9.
BordiaPRosnowRL (1998) Rumor rest stops on the information highway transmission patterns in a computer-mediated rumor chain. Human Communication Research25(2): 163–179.
10.
BovetAMakseH (2019) Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nature Communications10(7): 1–14.
11.
BrunsAHarringtonSHurcombeE (2020) ‘Corona? 5G? or both?’: the dynamics of COVID-19/5G conspiracy theories on Facebook. Media International Australia177(1): 12–29.
12.
ButterMKnightP (eds) (2020) Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. New York: Routledge.
ChewCEysenbachG (2010) Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS ONE5(11): e14118.
15.
CinelliMEttaGAvalleM, et al. (2022) Conspiracy theories and social media platforms. Current Opinion in Psychology101407. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101407.
CraftSAshleySMakslA (2017) News media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement. Communication and the Public2(4): 388–401.
18.
DiFonzoNBordiaP (2007) Rumor, gossip and urban legends. Diogenes54(1): 19–35.
19.
DiMaggioAR (2022) Conspiracy theories and the manufacture of dissent: QAnon, the “Big Lie,” covid-19, and the rise of rightwing propaganda. Critical Sociology48: 1025–1048.
20.
DouglasKMSuttonRM (2011) Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology50(3): 544–552.
21.
DouglasKMUscinskiJESuttonRM, et al. (2019) Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology 40(Suppl. 1): 3–35.
FeatherstoneJDRuizJBarnettG, et al. (2020) Exploring childhood vaccination themes and public opinions on Twitter: a semantic network analysis. Telematics and Informatics54: 101–474.
25.
FedericoCMWilliamsALVitriolJA (2018) The role of system identity threat in conspiracy theory endorsement. European Journal of Social Psychology48(7): 927–938.
26.
FranksBBangerterABauerMW (2013) Conspiracy theories as quasi-religious mentality: an integrated account from cognitive science, social representations theory, and frame theory. Frontiers in Psychology4: 424.
27.
FungIFuKChanC, et al. (2016) Social media’s initial reaction to information and misinformation on Ebola, August 2014: Facts and rumors. Public Health Reports131: 461–473.
GhenaiAMejovaY (2017) Catching Zika fever: application of crowdsourcing and machine learning for tracking health misinformation on Twitter. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on healthcare informatics (ICHI), Park City, UT, 23–26 August, pp. 518–518. New York: IEEE.
30.
GinossarTCruickshankIJZhelevaE, et al. (2022) Cross-platform spread: vaccine-related content, sources, and conspiracy theories in YouTube videos shared in early Twitter COVID-19 conversations. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics18(1): 1–13.
31.
GoreisAKothgassnerOD (2020) Social media as vehicle for conspiracy beliefs on COVID-19. Digital Psychology1(2): 36–39.
32.
HauptMRJinich-DiamantALiJ, et al. (2021) Characterizing twitter user topics and communication network dynamics of the “liberate” movement during COVID-19 using unsupervised machine learning and social network analysis. Online Social Networks and Media21: 100114.
HimelboimI (2017) Social network analysis (social media). In: MatthesJ (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. London: Wiley, pp. 1–15.
ImhoffRLambertyP (2020) A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science11(8): 1110–1118.
40.
ImhoffRZimmerFKleinO, et al. (2022) Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nature Human Behaviour6(3): 392–403.
41.
JangSMKimJK (2018) Third person effects of fake news: fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior80: 295–302.
42.
KeibKHimelboimIHanJY (2018) Important tweets matter: predicting retweets in the #blacklivesmatter talk on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior85: 106–115.
43.
KouYGuiXChenY, et al. (2017) Conspiracy talk on social media: collective sensemaking during a public health crisis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction1(CSCW): 61.
44.
KuklinskiJHQuirkPJJeritJ, et al. (2000) Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. Journal of Politics62(3): 790–816.
45.
LarsonHJarrettCEckersbergerE, et al. (2014) Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine32(19): 2150–2159.
46.
LazerDMJBaumMABenklerY, et al. (2018) The science of fake news. Science359(6380): 1094–1096.
47.
Lyons-WeilerJ (2020) Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity. Journal of Translational Autoimmunity3: 100051. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2020.100051.
48.
MahlDZengJSchäferMS (2021) From “Nasa Lies” to “Reptilian Eyes”: mapping communication about 10 conspiracy theories, their communities, and main propagators on Twitter. Social Media+Society7(2). DOI: 10.1177/20563051211017482.
49.
McBreenK (2020) Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation & others predicted up to 65 million deaths via coronavirus—In simulation ran 3 months ago!.
50.
McHughMCSapersteinSLGoldRS (2019) OMG U# cyberbully! An exploration of public discourse about cyberbullying on Twitter. Health Education & Behavior46(1): 97–105.
51.
MarcksHPawelzJ (2020) From myths of victimhood to fantasies of violence: How far-right narratives of imperilment work. Terrorism and Political Violence34: 1415–1432.
52.
MariaNZaidACatrinS, et al. (2020) The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. International Journal of Surgery78: 185–193.
53.
MillerJMSaundersKLFarhartCE (2016) Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: the moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science60(4): 824–844.
54.
MinSJ (2021) Who believes in conspiracy theories? Network diversity, political discussion, and conservative conspiracy theories on social media. American Politics Research49(5): 415–427.
55.
NaveedNGottronTKunegisJ, et al. (2011) Bad news travel fast: a content-based analysis of interestingness on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international web science conference, Koblenz, 15–17 June, pp. 1–7. New York: ACM.
56.
NgRIndranNLiuL (2022) A playbook for effective age advocacy on Twitter. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society70: 2363–2370.
57.
OberhauserC (2020) Freemasons, illuminati and jews: conspiracy theories and the French revolution. In: ButterMKnightP (eds) Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. New York: Routledge, pp. 555–568.
58.
ProoijenJWDouglasKM (2017) Conspiracy theories as part of history: the role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies10(3): 323–333.
59.
ShahsavariSHolurPWangT, et al. (2020) Conspiracy in the time of corona: automatic detection of emerging COVID-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news. Journal of Computational Social Science3(2): 279–317. DOI: 10.1007/s42001-020-00086-5.
60.
ShinJJianLDriscollK, et al. (2018) The diffusion of misinformation on social media: temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior83: 278–287.
61.
SinghLBodeLBudakC, et al. (2020) Understanding high-and low-quality URL sharing on COVID-19 Twitter streams. Journal of Computational Social Science3(2): 343–366.
62.
SmallpageSMDrochonHUscinskiJE, et al. (2020) Who are the conspiracy theorists? Demographics and conspiracy theories. In: ButterMKnightP (eds) Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. London: Routledge, pp. 263–277.
63.
SoJPrestinALeeL, et al. (2016) What do people like to “share” about obesity? A content analysis of frequent retweets about obesity on Twitter. Health Communication31(2): 193–206.
64.
StarbirdK (2017, May). Examining the alternative media ecosystem through the production of alternative narratives of mass shooting events on Twitter. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
65.
StephensM (2020) A geospatial infodemic: mapping Twitter conspiracy theories of COVID-19. Dialogues in Human Geography10: 276–281.
SunsteinCRVermeuleA (2009) Conspiracy theories: causes and cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy17: 202–227.
68.
TanakaYSakamotoYHondaH (2014) The impact of posting URLs in disaster-related tweets on rumor spreading behavior. In: 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa, HI, 6–9 January, pp. 520–529. New York: IEEE.
69.
TandocECLimDLingR (2020) Diffusion of disinformation: how social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism21(3): 381–398.
70.
TandocECJr (2019) The facts of fake news: a research review. Sociology Compass13(9): e12724.
71.
ThelwallMThelwallS (2020) A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets: consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life. Aslib Journal of Information Management72(6): 945–962.
UscinskiJEParentJM (2014) American Conspiracy Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75.
ValenzuelaSHalpernDKatzJE, et al. (2019) The paradox of participation versus misinformation: social media, political engagement, and the spread of misinformation. Digital Journalism7(6): 802–823.
VragaEKBodeL (2020) Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication37(1): 136–144.
78.
WestJDBergstromCT (2021) Misinformation in and about science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(15): e1912444117.
79.
WoodMJ (2018) Propagating and debunking conspiracy theories on Twitter during the 2015–2016 Zika virus outbreak. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking21(8): 485–490.
80.
XuY (2022) Evolution of audience duplication networks among social networking sites: exploring the influences of preferential attachment, audience size, and niche width. New Media & Society24(9): 2068–2087.
81.
ZonisMJosephCG (1994) Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology15: 443–459.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
