جمال_خاشقجي# #JamalKhashoggi: Unraveling multilingual Twitter sentiment dynamics in a longitudinal comparative analysis of tweets in Arabic and English

Abstract

In 2018, Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi journalist who wrote for the Washington Post, was last seen alive entering the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. Confirmed news of his murder ignited a heated and polarized public debate on Twitter. We use agenda melding as a theoretical lemma and argue that Twitter sentiment flourishes within multilingual, ad hoc public spheres contributing to an emotional agenda. We examined the Twitter sentiment from 2018 to 2021 by looking at the most popular hashtags used in both the Arabic-and-English language spheres. The daily sentiment analysis of 3,278,464 tweets revealed that both languages had a predominantly negative sentiment; however, the English sphere was more extreme in their emotional expression. An additional analysis of external media URLs found in a subsample of tweets highlighted distinct references to media discourse, emphasizing an East–West divide. Implications for global communication are discussed.

Keywords

#JamalKhashoggi ad hoc public spheres agenda melding multilingual sentiment analysis Twitter

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahams

Leber

(2021) Framing a murder: Twitter influencers and the Jamal Khashoggi incident. Mediterranean Politics 26(2): 247–259.

Ali Mohammed

Mccombs

(2021) Intermedia agenda setting or international news flow? Cross-lagged comparison of elite international newspapers. International Journal of Communication 15(2021): 3948–3969.

AlMomani

Atiyyat

(2020) التوظيف السياسي للخطاب الإعلامي في مقتل الصحفي جمال خاشقجي: المواقع الإخبارية لقناة الجزيرة وجريدة واشنطن بوست نموذجا [The politicization of media discourse in the murder of the journalist Jamal Khashoggi: the news websites of Aljazeera and the Washington Post as a model]. Dirasat: Educational Sciences 47(2): 38–52.

Bang

Lee

Rao

(2021) The Egyptian protest movement in the twittersphere: an investigation of dual sentiment pathways of communication. International Journal of Information Management 58: 102328.

Bayer

(2012) SQLAlchemy. In: Brown

Wilson

(eds) The Architecture of Open Source Applications Volume II: Structure, Scale, and a Few More Fearless Hacks, pp. 291–314. Available at: https://aosabook.org/en/sqlalchemy.html

Beckett

Deuze

(2016) On the role of emotion in the future of Journalism. Social Media + Society 2(3): 2056305116662395.

Birkland

(1998) Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy 18(1): 53–74.

Bodrunova

Smoliarova

Blekanov

, et al. (2018) A global public sphere of compassion? #JeSuisCharlie and #JeNeSuisPasCharlie on Twitter and their language boundaries. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes 1: 267–267.

Bruns

Burgess

(2011) The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Available at: https://asset-pdf.scinapse.io/prod/35899105/35899105.pdf

10.

Castells

(2008) The new public sphere: global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 78–93.

11.

CBS News (n.d.) Mohammad bin Salman denies ordering Khashoggi murder, but says he takes responsibility for it. CBS News. Available at: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mohammad-bin-salman-denies-ordering-khashoggi-murder-but-says-he-takes-responsibility-for-it-60-minutes-2019-09-29/ (accessed 4 November 2021).

12.

Ceron

Curini

Iacus

(2016) First- and second-level agenda setting in the Twittersphere: an application to the Italian political debate. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(2): 159–174.

13.

Chadwick

(2013) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

14.

Chang

T-K

(1998) All countries not created equal to be news: world system and international communication. Communication Research 25(5): 528–563.

15.

Chuang

Roemer

(2013) The immigrant Muslim American at the boundary of insider and outsider: representations of Faisal Shahzad as “Homegrown” terrorist. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 90(1): 89–107.

16.

CNN (n.d.) Jamal Khashoggi fast facts. CNN. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/10/middleeast/jamal-khashoggi-fast-facts/index.html (accessed 18 October 2021).

17.

CNN Arabic (2018) “اختفاء في عز الظهر”. . تسلسل زمني لتطورات قضية جمال خاشقجي أولا بأول. CNN Arabic, 19 October. Available at: https://arabic.cnn.com/middle-east/article/2018/10/19/khashoggi-saudi-turkey-crisis-timeline

18.

DW (n.d.) Ugandan blogger’s “life in peril” after arrest in Turkey. DW. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/ugandan-bloggers-life-in-peril-after-arrest-in-turkey/a-58778226 (accessed 4 November 2021).

19.

El-Falaky

(2019) Murder in the consulate: the grammar of transitivity in the headlines of news reports about Jamal Khashoggi. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 10(3): 11–22.

20.

Ferrara

Yang

(2015) Quantifying the effect of sentiment on information diffusion in social media. PeerJ Computer Science 1: e26.

21.

Fisk

(2011) Global public sphere. In: Chatterjee

(ed.) Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 439–441.

22.

Fraser

(2007) Special section: transnational public sphere: transnationalizing the public sphere: on the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. Theory, Culture & Society 24(4): 7–30.

23.

Galtung

(1971) A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research 8(2): 81–117.

24.

Gamal

Alfonse

El-Horbaty

E-SM

, et al. (2018) Opinion mining for Arabic dialects on Twitter. Egyptian Computer Science Journal 42(4): 52–61.

25.

Giglietto

Lee

(2017) A hashtag worth a thousand words: discursive strategies around #JeNeSuisPasCharlie after the 2015 Charlie Hebdo shooting. Social Media + Society 3(1): 2056305116686992.

26.

Gilkerson

Berg

(2017) Social media, hashtag hijacking, and the evolution of an activist group strategy. In: Jin

Austin

(eds) Social Media and Crisis Communication. New York: Routledge, pp. 141–155.

27.

Golan

(2006) Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage: assessing the influence of the New York Times on three network television evening news programs. Journalism Studies 7(2): 323–333.

28.

Grasland

(2020) International news flow theory revisited through a space–time interaction model: application to a sample of 320,000 international news stories published through RSS flows by 31 daily newspapers in 2015. International Communication Gazette 82(3): 231–259.

29.

Groshek

Tandoc

(2017) The affordance effect: gatekeeping and (non)reciprocal journalism on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior 66: 201–210.

30.

Gruzd

Doiron

Mai

(2011) Is happiness contagious online? A case of Twitter and the 2010 Winter Olympics. In: 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kauai, HI, 4–7 January, pp. 1–9. New York: IEEE.

31.

Guo

Vargo

(2017) Global intermedia agenda setting: a Big Data analysis of international news flow. Journal of Communication 67(4): 499–520.

32.

Hopke

(2015) Hashtagging politics: transnational anti-fracking movement Twitter practices. Social Media + Society 1(2): 2056305115605521.

33.

Hunt

Gruszczynski

(2021) The influence of new and traditional media coverage on public attention to social movements: the case of the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. Information, Communication & Society 24(7): 1024–1040.

34.

Isani

(2021) Methodological problems of using Arabic-language Twitter as a gauge for Arab attitudes toward politics and society. Contemporary Review of the Middle East 8(1): 22–35.

35.

Jahng

Doshi

(2021) Securitising an international humanitarian crisis: news framing of the Syrian refugee crisis in the US. The Journal of International Communication 27(2): 283–299.

36.

Jamal

Keohane

Romney

, et al. (2015) Anti-Americanism and anti-interventionism in Arabic Twitter discourses. Perspectives on Politics 13(1): 55–73.

37.

Kepplinger

Brosius

H-B

Staab

(1991) Instrumental actualization: a theory of mediated conflicts. European Journal of Communication 6(3): 263–290.

38.

Kirkpatrick

Gall

(2018) Audio offers gruesome details of Jamal Khashoggi Killing, Turkish official says. The New York Times, 17 October. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/17/world/europe/turkey-saudi-khashoggi-dismember.html

39.

Kovács

Kovács-Győri

Resch

(2021) #AllforJan: how Twitter users in Europe reacted to the murder of Ján Kuciak—revealing spatiotemporal patterns through sentiment analysis and topic modeling. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information 10(9): 585.

40.

Kursuncu

Gaur

Lokala

, et al. (2018) Predictive analysis on Twitter: techniques and applications. In: Agarwal

Dokoohaki

Tokdemir

(eds) Emerging Research Challenges and Opportunities in Computational Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer International Publishing, pp. 67–104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94105-9_4

41.

Livingston

Asmolov

(2010) Networks and the future of foreign affairs reporting. Journalism Studies 11(5): 745–760.

42.

McCombs

Llamas

Lopez-Escobar

, et al. (1997) Candidate images in Spanish elections: second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 4: 703–717.

43.

McCombs

Shaw

Weaver

(2014) New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication & Society 17(6): 781–802.

44.

Marchal

Neudert

L-M

Kollanyi

, et al. (2018) Polarization, partisanship and junk news consumption on social media during the 2018 US midterm elections. Available at: https://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/127/2018/11/marchal_et_al.pdf

45.

Milanovic

(2020) The murder of Jamal Khashoggi: immunities, inviolability and the human right to life. Human Rights Law Review 20(1): 1–49.

46.

Miller

(2007) Examining the mediators of agenda setting: a new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Political Psychology 28(6): 689–717.

47.

Mohammad

Turney

(2013) Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence 29(3): 436–465.

48.

Naskar

Singh

Kumar

, et al. (2020) Emotion dynamics of public opinions on Twitter. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 38(2): 1–24.

49.

Nikolayenko

(2019) Framing and counter-framing a Peace March in Russia: the use of Twitter during a hybrid war. Social Movement Studies 18(5): 602–621.

50.

O’Boyle

(2019) Twitter diplomacy between India and the United States: agenda-building analysis of tweets during presidential state visits. Global Media and Communication 15(1): 121–134.

51.

O’Boyle

Pardun

(2021) How Twitter drives the global news agenda: tweets from Brazil, Russia, India, China, the UK and US and online discourse about the 2016 US presidential election. Global Media and Communication 17(3): 363–384.

52.

Öztürk

Ayvaz

(2018) Sentiment analysis on Twitter: a text mining approach to the Syrian refugee crisis. Telematics and Informatics 35(1): 136–147.

53.

Qin

(2015) Hero on Twitter, traitor on news: how social media and legacy news frame Snowden. The International Journal of Press/Politics 20(2): 166–184.

54.

Rastogi

Bansal

(2021) Visualization of Twitter sentiments on Kashmir territorial conflict. Cybernetics and Systems 52(8): 642–669.

55.

Roberts

Mccombs

(1994) Agenda setting and political advertising: origins of the news agenda. Political Communication 11(3): 249–262.

56.

Romney

Jamal

Keohane

, et al. (2021) The enemy of my enemy is not my friend: Arabic Twitter sentiment toward ISIS and the United States. International Studies Quarterly 65(4): 1176–1184.

57.

Russell Neuman

Guggenheim

Mo Jang

, et al. (2014) The dynamics of public attention: agenda-setting theory meets Big Data. Journal of Communication 64(2): 193–214.

58.

Salem

(2017) Social media and the Internet of Things: towards data-driven policymaking in the Arab world (No. 7). Available at: https://mbrsgcdn.azureedge.net/cmsstorage/mbrsg/files/13/1383b88a-6eb9-476a-bae4-61903688099b.pdf

59.

Sanderson

Barnes

Williamson

, et al. (2016) “How could anyone have predicted that #AskJameis would go horribly wrong?” public relations, social media, and hashtag hijacking. Public Relations Review 42(1): 31–37.

60.

Silge

Robinson

(2016) tidytext: text mining and analysis using tidy data principles in R. JOSS 1(3): 37.

61.

Thorsen

Sreedharan

(2019) #EndMaleGuardianship: women’s rights, social media and the Arab public sphere. New Media & Society 21(5): 1121–1140.

62.

Twarc (2021) Twarc2. Available at: https://twarc-project.readthedocs.io/en/latest/twarc2_en_us/

63.

Vliegenthart

Walgrave

(2008) The contingency of intermedia agenda setting: a longitudinal study in Belgium. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 85(4): 860–877.

64.

Wahl-Jorgensen

(2019) Questioning the ideal of the public sphere: the emotional turn. Social Media + Society 5(3): 2056305119852175.

65.

Wang

Wei

Liu

, et al. (2011) Topic sentiment analysis in twitter: a graph-based hashtag sentiment classification approach. Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 1031–1040. Availabel at: https://doi.org/10.1145/2063576.2063726

66.

Weimann

Brosius

H-B

(2017) Redirecting the agenda: agenda-setting in the online era. Agenda Setting Journal: Theory, Practice, Critique 1(1): 63–101.

67.

Xanthopoulos

Panagopoulos

Bakamitsos

, et al. (2016) Hashtag hijacking: what it is, why it happens and how to avoid it. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing 3(4): 353–362.

68.

Zarocostas

(2018) Physician alleged to have taken part in Khashoggi murder. The Lancet 392(10158): 1613.

69.

Zonis

Joseph

(1994) Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology 15(3): 443–459.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB