Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-9
جمال_خاشقجي# #JamalKhashoggi: Unraveling multilingual Twitter sentiment dynamics in a longitudinal comparative analysis of tweets in Arabic and English
In 2018, Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi journalist who wrote for the Washington Post, was last seen alive entering the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. Confirmed news of his murder ignited a heated and polarized public debate on Twitter. We use agenda melding as a theoretical lemma and argue that Twitter sentiment flourishes within multilingual, ad hoc public spheres contributing to an emotional agenda. We examined the Twitter sentiment from 2018 to 2021 by looking at the most popular hashtags used in both the Arabic-and-English language spheres. The daily sentiment analysis of 3,278,464 tweets revealed that both languages had a predominantly negative sentiment; however, the English sphere was more extreme in their emotional expression. An additional analysis of external media URLs found in a subsample of tweets highlighted distinct references to media discourse, emphasizing an East–West divide. Implications for global communication are discussed.
AbrahamsALeberA (2021) Framing a murder: Twitter influencers and the Jamal Khashoggi incident. Mediterranean Politics26(2): 247–259.
2.
Ali MohammedSHMccombsM (2021) Intermedia agenda setting or international news flow? Cross-lagged comparison of elite international newspapers. International Journal of Communication15(2021): 3948–3969.
3.
AlMomaniHAtiyyatL (2020) التوظيف السياسي للخطاب الإعلامي في مقتل الصحفي جمال خاشقجي: المواقع الإخبارية لقناة الجزيرة وجريدة واشنطن بوست نموذجا [The politicization of media discourse in the murder of the journalist Jamal Khashoggi: the news websites of Aljazeera and the Washington Post as a model]. Dirasat: Educational Sciences47(2): 38–52.
4.
BangCCLeeJRaoHR (2021) The Egyptian protest movement in the twittersphere: an investigation of dual sentiment pathways of communication. International Journal of Information Management58: 102328.
5.
BayerM (2012) SQLAlchemy. In: BrownAWilsonG (eds) The Architecture of Open Source Applications Volume II: Structure, Scale, and a Few More Fearless Hacks, pp. 291–314. Available at: https://aosabook.org/en/sqlalchemy.html
6.
BeckettCDeuzeM (2016) On the role of emotion in the future of Journalism. Social Media + Society2(3): 2056305116662395.
7.
BirklandTA (1998) Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy18(1): 53–74.
8.
BodrunovaSSmoliarovaSBlekanovS, et al. (2018) A global public sphere of compassion? #JeSuisCharlie and #JeNeSuisPasCharlie on Twitter and their language boundaries. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes1: 267–267.
CastellsM (2008) The new public sphere: global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science616(1): 78–93.
CeronACuriniLIacusSM (2016) First- and second-level agenda setting in the Twittersphere: an application to the Italian political debate. Journal of Information Technology & Politics13(2): 159–174.
13.
ChadwickA (2013) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
ChangT-K (1998) All countries not created equal to be news: world system and international communication. Communication Research25(5): 528–563.
15.
ChuangARoemerRC (2013) The immigrant Muslim American at the boundary of insider and outsider: representations of Faisal Shahzad as “Homegrown” terrorist. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90(1): 89–107.
El-FalakyMS (2019) Murder in the consulate: the grammar of transitivity in the headlines of news reports about Jamal Khashoggi. Advances in Language and Literary Studies10(3): 11–22.
20.
FerraraEYangZ (2015) Quantifying the effect of sentiment on information diffusion in social media. PeerJ Computer Science1: e26.
21.
FiskM (2011) Global public sphere. In: ChatterjeeDK (ed.) Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 439–441.
22.
FraserN (2007) Special section: transnational public sphere: transnationalizing the public sphere: on the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. Theory, Culture & Society24(4): 7–30.
23.
GaltungJ (1971) A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research8(2): 81–117.
24.
GamalDAlfonseMEl-HorbatyE-SM, et al. (2018) Opinion mining for Arabic dialects on Twitter. Egyptian Computer Science Journal42(4): 52–61.
25.
GigliettoFLeeY (2017) A hashtag worth a thousand words: discursive strategies around #JeNeSuisPasCharlie after the 2015 Charlie Hebdo shooting. Social Media + Society3(1): 2056305116686992.
26.
GilkersonNBergKT (2017) Social media, hashtag hijacking, and the evolution of an activist group strategy. In: JinYAustinLL (eds) Social Media and Crisis Communication. New York: Routledge, pp. 141–155.
27.
GolanG (2006) Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage: assessing the influence of the New York Times on three network television evening news programs. Journalism Studies7(2): 323–333.
28.
GraslandC (2020) International news flow theory revisited through a space–time interaction model: application to a sample of 320,000 international news stories published through RSS flows by 31 daily newspapers in 2015. International Communication Gazette82(3): 231–259.
29.
GroshekJTandocE (2017) The affordance effect: gatekeeping and (non)reciprocal journalism on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior66: 201–210.
30.
GruzdADoironSMaiP (2011) Is happiness contagious online? A case of Twitter and the 2010 Winter Olympics. In: 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kauai, HI, 4–7 January, pp. 1–9. New York: IEEE.
31.
GuoLVargoCJ (2017) Global intermedia agenda setting: a Big Data analysis of international news flow. Journal of Communication67(4): 499–520.
32.
HopkeJE (2015) Hashtagging politics: transnational anti-fracking movement Twitter practices. Social Media + Society1(2): 2056305115605521.
33.
HuntKGruszczynskiM (2021) The influence of new and traditional media coverage on public attention to social movements: the case of the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. Information, Communication & Society24(7): 1024–1040.
34.
IsaniMA (2021) Methodological problems of using Arabic-language Twitter as a gauge for Arab attitudes toward politics and society. Contemporary Review of the Middle East8(1): 22–35.
35.
JahngMRDoshiMJ (2021) Securitising an international humanitarian crisis: news framing of the Syrian refugee crisis in the US. The Journal of International Communication27(2): 283–299.
36.
JamalAAKeohaneRORomneyD, et al. (2015) Anti-Americanism and anti-interventionism in Arabic Twitter discourses. Perspectives on Politics13(1): 55–73.
37.
KepplingerHMBrosiusH-BStaabJF (1991) Instrumental actualization: a theory of mediated conflicts. European Journal of Communication6(3): 263–290.
KovácsTKovács-GyőriAReschB (2021) #AllforJan: how Twitter users in Europe reacted to the murder of Ján Kuciak—revealing spatiotemporal patterns through sentiment analysis and topic modeling. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information10(9): 585.
40.
KursuncuUGaurMLokalaU, et al. (2018) Predictive analysis on Twitter: techniques and applications. In: AgarwalNDokoohakiNTokdemirS (eds) Emerging Research Challenges and Opportunities in Computational Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer International Publishing, pp. 67–104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94105-9_4
41.
LivingstonSAsmolovG (2010) Networks and the future of foreign affairs reporting. Journalism Studies11(5): 745–760.
42.
McCombsMLlamasJPLopez-EscobarE, et al. (1997) Candidate images in Spanish elections: second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly4: 703–717.
43.
McCombsMEShawDLWeaverDH (2014) New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication & Society17(6): 781–802.
MilanovicM (2020) The murder of Jamal Khashoggi: immunities, inviolability and the human right to life. Human Rights Law Review20(1): 1–49.
46.
MillerJM (2007) Examining the mediators of agenda setting: a new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Political Psychology28(6): 689–717.
47.
MohammadSMTurneyPD (2013) Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence29(3): 436–465.
48.
NaskarDSinghSRKumarD, et al. (2020) Emotion dynamics of public opinions on Twitter. ACM Transactions on Information Systems38(2): 1–24.
49.
NikolayenkoO (2019) Framing and counter-framing a Peace March in Russia: the use of Twitter during a hybrid war. Social Movement Studies18(5): 602–621.
50.
O’BoyleJ (2019) Twitter diplomacy between India and the United States: agenda-building analysis of tweets during presidential state visits. Global Media and Communication15(1): 121–134.
51.
O’BoyleJPardunCJ (2021) How Twitter drives the global news agenda: tweets from Brazil, Russia, India, China, the UK and US and online discourse about the 2016 US presidential election. Global Media and Communication17(3): 363–384.
52.
ÖztürkNAyvazS (2018) Sentiment analysis on Twitter: a text mining approach to the Syrian refugee crisis. Telematics and Informatics35(1): 136–147.
53.
QinJ (2015) Hero on Twitter, traitor on news: how social media and legacy news frame Snowden. The International Journal of Press/Politics20(2): 166–184.
54.
RastogiSBansalD (2021) Visualization of Twitter sentiments on Kashmir territorial conflict. Cybernetics and Systems52(8): 642–669.
55.
RobertsMMccombsM (1994) Agenda setting and political advertising: origins of the news agenda. Political Communication11(3): 249–262.
56.
RomneyDJamalAAKeohaneRO, et al. (2021) The enemy of my enemy is not my friend: Arabic Twitter sentiment toward ISIS and the United States. International Studies Quarterly65(4): 1176–1184.
57.
Russell NeumanWGuggenheimLMo JangS, et al. (2014) The dynamics of public attention: agenda-setting theory meets Big Data. Journal of Communication64(2): 193–214.
SandersonJBarnesKWilliamsonC, et al. (2016) “How could anyone have predicted that #AskJameis would go horribly wrong?” public relations, social media, and hashtag hijacking. Public Relations Review42(1): 31–37.
60.
SilgeJRobinsonD (2016) tidytext: text mining and analysis using tidy data principles in R. JOSS1(3): 37.
61.
ThorsenESreedharanC (2019) #EndMaleGuardianship: women’s rights, social media and the Arab public sphere. New Media & Society21(5): 1121–1140.
VliegenthartRWalgraveS (2008) The contingency of intermedia agenda setting: a longitudinal study in Belgium. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly85(4): 860–877.
64.
Wahl-JorgensenK (2019) Questioning the ideal of the public sphere: the emotional turn. Social Media + Society5(3): 2056305119852175.
65.
WangXWeiFLiuX, et al. (2011) Topic sentiment analysis in twitter: a graph-based hashtag sentiment classification approach. Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 1031–1040. Availabel at: https://doi.org/10.1145/2063576.2063726
66.
WeimannGBrosiusH-B (2017) Redirecting the agenda: agenda-setting in the online era. Agenda Setting Journal: Theory, Practice, Critique1(1): 63–101.
67.
XanthopoulosPPanagopoulosOPBakamitsosGA, et al. (2016) Hashtag hijacking: what it is, why it happens and how to avoid it. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing3(4): 353–362.
68.
ZarocostasJ (2018) Physician alleged to have taken part in Khashoggi murder. The Lancet392(10158): 1613.
69.
ZonisMJosephCM (1994) Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology15(3): 443–459.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
