This article draws evidence from a national survey conducted in the Republic of Cyprus. Examining the influencer phenomenon, personal salience is scrutinised as the primary objective of ordinary social media users seeking to draw attention toward themselves. Respondents provided evidence about the types of content they desire in connection with influencers they follow on social media. Furthermore, they provided perceptional evidence about Instagram’s capacity to render individuals salient in social media communities. Finally, the study shows that demographic characteristics and certain types of personal content are associated with influencers’ personal salience.
AbidinC. (2016). Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online? Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media & Society, 2(2), 1–17. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342
2.
BantimaroudisP. (2017). Setting agendas in cultural markets: Organisations, creators, experiences. Routledge.
3.
BantimaroudisP. (2021). Agenda selfying and agenda melding: Advancing the salience of the self. Agenda Setting Journal, 5(2), 115–133.
4.
BantimaroudisP., ManiouT., & ZiogasT. (2023). You are the agenda: The pursuit of personal significance in social media contexts. Communications. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2021-0107
5.
CastellsM. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
6.
ChadwickA. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
7.
ChaeJ. (2018). Explaining females’ envy toward social media influencers. Media Psychology, 21(2), 246–262. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1328312
8.
CouldryN. (2002). Playing for celebrity: Big brother as ritual event. Television & New Media, 3(3), 283–293. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152747640200300304
9.
DavisonW. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268763
10.
Du PreezA. (2018). Sublime selfies: To witness death. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(6), 744–760. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367549417718210
11.
DuffyB. E., & HundE. (2015). ‘Having it all’ on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media and Society, 1–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604337
12.
FairchildC. (2007). Building the authentic celebrity: The ‘idol’ phenomenon in the attention economy. Popular Music and Society, 30(3), 355–375. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03007760600835306
13.
GamsonJ. (2011). The unwatched life is not worth living: The elevation of the ordinary in celebrity culture. Theories and Methodologies, 126(4), 1061–1069. https://dx.doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2011.126.4.1061
14.
GräveJ. (2019). What KPIs are key? Evaluating performance metrics for social media influencers. Social Media and Society, 5(3), 1–9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2056305119865475
15.
GuoL., & McCombsM. (2016). The power of information networks: New directions for agenda-setting research. Routledge.
16.
HerskovitzS., & CrystalM. (2010). The essential brand persona: Storytelling andbranding. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(3), 21–28. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02756661011036673
17.
KhamisS., AngL., & WellingR. (2017). Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’, and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8(2), 191–208. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292
18.
KiousisS. (2004). Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of New York times issue coverage during the 2000 U.S. Presidential election. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02614.x
19.
LoI. S., & McKercherB. (2015). Ideal image in the process: Online tourist photography and impression management. Annals of Tourism Research, 52, 104–116. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.02.019
20.
LutkenhausR. O., JanszJ., & BoumanP. A. (2019). Tailoring in the digital era: Stimulating dialogues on health topics in collaboration with social media influencers. Digital Health, 5, 1–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207618821521
21.
MacDonaldP. (2014). Narcissism in the modern world. Psychodynamic Practice, 20(2), 144–153. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2014.894225
22.
MarwickA. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture, 27(1[75]), 137–160. https://dx.doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379
23.
McCombsM. E., & ValenzuelaS. (2021). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion(3rd ed.). Polity Press.
24.
MunarA. M., & JacobsenJ. K. S. (2014). Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media. Tourism Management, 43, 46–54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.01.012
25.
RagasM. W., & RobertsM. (2009). Agenda setting and agenda melding in an age of horizontal and vertical media: A new theoretical lens for virtual brand communities. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 45–64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077699013493792
26.
ShawD. L., McCombsM., WeaverD. H., & HammB. J. (1999). Individuals, groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11(1), 2–24. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.1.2
27.
ShawD., MinooieM., AikatD., & VargoC. (2019). Agendamelding: News, social media, audiences, and civic community. Peter Lang. https://dx.doi.org/10.3726/b15023
28.
SymeouP., BantimaroudisP., & ZyglidopoulosS. (2015). Cultural agenda setting and the role of critics: An empirical examination in the market for art-house films. Communication Research, 42(5), 732–754.
29.
TembeckT. (2016). Selfies of ill health: Online autoethnographic photography and the dramaturgy of the everyday. Social Media & Society, 2(1), 1–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641343
30.
TurnerG. (2006). The mass production of celebrities: ‘Celetoids’, reality TV and the ‘demotic turn’. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(2), 153–165. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367877906064028
31.
TurnleyW. H., & BolinoM. C. (2001). Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 351–360. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.351
32.
WeidmanL. M. (2016). Attributes of a cultural/consumer product: Oregon wine. In GuoL. & McCombsM. (Eds.), The power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting research (pp. 206–220). Routledge.
33.
ZappavignaM., & ZhaoS. (2017). Selfies in ‘mommy blogging’: An emerging visual genre. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 239–247. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.05.005
34.
ZhuJ. (1992). Issue competition and attention distraction: A zero-sum theory of agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 825–836. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900403
