Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Utilizing the #MeToo movement as its case, this article examines celebrities’ symbolic power using social media’s connectivity to enlarge the impact of social causes. This article adopts social network analysis as the primary method to explore the relationship between two #MeToo networks and media coverage regarding celebrities’ roles. Based on theories of social capital and celebrity capital, the results of this article find that famous people’s symbolic power in one social field can transfer into the social activism field through investment in their celebrity capital and social capital.

Keywords

Celebrity capital field migration network analysis online activism social capital

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Toor

(2018) How social media users have discussed sexual harassment since #MeToo went viral. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/11/how-social-media-users-have-discussed-sexual-harassment-since-metoo-went-viral/ (accessed 2 May 2020).

Arthurs

Shaw

(2016) Celebrity capital in the political field: Russell Brand’s migration from stand-up comedy to Newsnight. Media, Culture & Society 38(8): 1136–1152.

Baym

(2010) Personal Connections in the Digital Age: Digital Media and Society Series. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Borgatti

Everett

Johnson

(2018) Analyzing Social Networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Bourdieu

(1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson

(ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.

Bourdieu

Johnson

(1993) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.

Bourdieu

Wacquant

(2013) Symbolic capital and social classes. Journal of Classical Sociology 13(2): 292–302.

Brockington

(2021) Celebrity advocacy. In: Chouliaraki

Vestergaard

(eds) Routledge Handbook of Humanitarian Communication. Routledge, pp. 252–265.

Brockington

Henson

(2015) Signifying the public: celebrity advocacy and post-democratic politics. International Journal of Cultural Studies 18(4): 431–448.

10.

Burt

(2004) Structural holes and good ideas. The American Journal of Sociology 110(2): 349–399.

11.

Cameron

Trivedi

(2013) Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Chidgey

(2021) Postfeminism^TM: celebrity feminism, branding and the performance of activist capital. Feminist Media Studies 21(7): 1055–1071.

13.

Couldry

(2003) Media meta-capital: extending the range of Bourdieu’s field theory. Theory and Society 32(5): 653–677.

14.

Couldry

Markham

(2007) Celebrity culture and public connection: bridge or chasm? International Journal of Cultural Studies 10(4): 403–421.

15.

De Benedictis

Orgad

Rottenberg

(2019) #MeToo, popular feminism and the news : a content analysis of UK newspaper coverage. European Journal of Cultural Studies 22: 718–738.

16.

Diani

(2016) Social movements and collective action. In: Scott

Carrington

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 223–235.

17.

Driessens

(2013a) Celebrity capital: redefining celebrity using field theory. Theory and Society 42(5): 543–560.

18.

Driessens

(2013b) The celebritization of society and culture: understanding the structural dynamics of celebrity culture. International Journal of Cultural Studies 16(6): 641–657.

19.

Earle

(2019) ‘The consequences will be with us for decades’: the politicization and polarization of the #MeToo and Time’s Up movements in the United States. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture 10(3): 257–271.

20.

Giles

(2015) Field migration, cultural mobility and celebrity: the case of Paul McCartney. Celebrity Studies 6(4): 538–552.

21.

Gill

Rahman-Jones

(2020) Me Too founder Tarana Burke: movement is not over. BBC, 9 July. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-53269751 (accessed 1 June 2022).

22.

Gruzd

Haythornthwaite

(2013) Enabling community through social media. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15(10): 1–17.

23.

Gruzd

Haythornthwaite

(2016) Networking online: cybercommunities. In: Scott

Carrington

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 167–179.

24.

Kaufman

Dey

Crainiceanu

, et al. (2019) #MeToo and Google inquiries into sexual violence: a hashtag campaign can sustain information seeking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36: 9857–9867.

25.

Krinsky

Crossley

(2014) Social movements and social networks: Introduction. Social Movement Studies 13(1): 1–21.

26.

Kurzman

Anderson

Key

, et al. (2007) Celebrity status. Sociological Theory 25(4): 347–367.

27.

Lin

(1999) Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22(1): 28–51.

28.

Littler

(2008) “I feel your pain”: cosmopolitan charity and the public fashioning of the celebrity soul. Social Semiotics 18(2): 237–251.

29.

Malinick

Tindall

Diani

(2013) Network centrality and social movement media coverage: a two-mode network analytic approach. Social Networks 35(2): 148–158.

30.

Markham

(2015) Celebrity advocacy and public engagement: the divergent uses of celebrity. International Journal of Cultural Studies 18(4): 467–480.

31.

Marshall

Moore

Barbour

(2015) Persona as method: exploring celebrity and the public self through persona studies. Celebrity Studies 6(3): 288–305.

32.

Mendes

(2012) ‘Feminism rules! Now, where’s my swimsuit?’ Re-evaluating feminist discourse in print media 1968-2008. Media, Culture & Society 34(5): 554–570.

33.

Mendes

Ringrose

Keller

(2018) #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies 25(2): 236–246.

34.

Meyer

Gamson

(1995) The challenge of cultural elites: celebrities and social movements. Sociological Inquiry 65(2): 181–206.

35.

Munshi-Kurian

Munshi

Kurian

(2019) Strategic interventions in sociology’s resource mobilization theory: reimagining the #MeToo movement as critical public relations. Public Relations Review 45(5): 101788.

36.

Nisbett

DeWalt

(2016) Exploring the influence of celebrities in politics: a focus group study of young voters. Atlantic Journal of Communication 24(3): 144–156.

37.

Oliva

(2020) From the literary field to reality TV: the perils of downward celebrity migration. European Journal of Cultural Studies 23(1): 18–34.

38.

Pew Research Center (2020) Demographics of social media users and adoption in the United States. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/ (accessed 23 June 2020)

39.

Piacenza

(2018) A Year Into #MeToo, Public Worried About False Allegations. Available at: https://morningconsult.com/2018/10/11/a-year-into-metoo-public-worried-about-false-allegations/ (accessed 20 April 2019).

40.

Rodino-Colocino

(2018) Me too, #MeToo: countering cruelty with empathy. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15(1): 96–100.

41.

Santiago

Diekema

(2017) #MeToo: an activist, a little girl and the heartbreaking origin of “Me too.” CNN, 17 October. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/17/us/me-too-tarana-burke-origin-trnd/index.html (accessed 11 June 2019).

42.

Sini

(2017) How “MeToo” is exposing the scale of sexual abuse. BBC News, 16 October. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-41633857 (accessed 11 June 2019).

43.

Smith

Rainie

Himelboim

, et al. (2014) Mapping Twitter Topic Networks: From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters. Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/20/mapping-twitter-topic-networks-from-polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/ (accessed 22 October 2022).

44.

Steinfield

Ellison

Lampe

, et al. (2012) Online social network sites and the concept of social capital. In: Lee

Leung

Qiu

, et al (eds) Frontiers in New Media Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 115–131.

45.

Stewart

Giles

(2020) Celebrity status and the attribution of value. European Journal of Cultural Studies 23(1): 3–17.

46.

Sturgess

Burns

(2018) Ending the silence of sexual assault victims: the #MeToo campaign on Twitter. In: Yook B and Chen ZF (eds) 21st International Public Relations Research Conference, 8–10 March 2018, pp. 343–356.

47.

Thorbecke

(2018) Celebrities who helped launch #MeToo movement react to Kavanaugh hearing. ABC News, 27 September. Available at: https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/News/celebrities-helped-launch-metoo-movement-react-kavanaugh-hearing/story?id=58126207 (accessed 7 March 2019).

48.

Thrall

Lollio-Fakhreddine

Berent

, et al. (2008) Star power: celebrity advocacy and the evolution of the public sphere. International Journal of Press/Politics 13(4): 362–385.

49.

Tufekci

(2013) ‘Not this one’: social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist 57(7): 848–870.

50.

Webster

(2018) The Marketplace of Attention. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

51.

Xiong

Cho

Boatwright

(2019) Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement. Public Relations Review 45(1): 10–23.

52.

Zhang

Wells

Wang

, et al. (2018) Attention and amplification in the hybrid media system: the composition and activity of Donald Trump’s Twitter following during the 2016 presidential election. New Media and Society 20(9): 3161–3182.

#MeToo on Twitter: The migration of celebrity capital and social capital in online celebrity advocacy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References