Thus spoke Zuckerberg: Journalistic discourse,executive personae,and the personalization of tech industry power

Abstract

As technology chief executive officers have become public figures, their personae operate as loci for journalistic discourse about the intersection of moral responsibilities, regulation, and political-economic power of the tech industry. They possess a power often construed as beyond the reach of politics or civil society to address. This study considers how the ubiquity of tech power has become a kind of common sense in journalistic discourse, specifically looking at news, commentary, and analysis that has circulated around Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg since 2016, arguing that even as critiques of Zuckerberg’s moral fitness and leadership capacity proliferate, they construct the epistemic bounds within which tech industry power over American public life is understood as legitimate, even as journalists and commentators question certain executives’ ability to wield the tech industry’s infrastructural and cultural power.

Keywords

Critical discourse analysis Facebook journalistic discourse Mark Zuckerberg Silicon Valley technology industries

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrejevic

(2008) Power, knowledge, and governance: Foucault’s relevance to journalism studies. Journalism Studies 9(4): 605–614.

Barthes

(1972) Mythologies. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Buozis

(2021) Making common sense of cyberlibertarian ideology: the journalistic consecration of John Perry Barlow. Internet Histories. Epub ahead of print 7 July. DOI: 10.1080/24701475.2021.1943994.

Carlson

(2018) Facebook in the news: social media, journalism, and public responsibility following the 2016 trending topics controversy. Digital Journalism 6(1): 4–20.

Carlson

Usher

(2016) News startups as agents of innovation: for-profit digital news startup manifestos as metajournalistic discourse. Digital Journalism 4(5): 563–581.

Chafkin

Frier

(2017) Mark Zuckerberg’s fake news problem isn’t going away. Bloomberg Businessweek, 21 September. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-09-21/mark-zuckerberg-s-political-awakening

Chappel

(2021) The Facebook papers: what you need to know about the trove of insider documents. National Public Radio, 21 October. Available at: https://www.npr.org/2021/10/25/1049015366/the-facebook-papers-what-you-need-to-know

Creech

(2020) Fake news and the discursive construction of technology companies’ social power. Media, Culture & Society 42(6): 952–968.

Davies

(2018) Fresh air —the central question behind Facebook: “what does Mark Zuckerberg believe in?” [Audio Podcast]. National Public Radio, 4 October. Available at: https://www.npr.org/2018/10/04/654333466/the-central-question-behind-facebook-what-does-mark-zuckerberg-believe-in

10.

Dean

(1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

11.

Editorial Board (2020) Opinion: Joe Biden. The New York Times, 17 January. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/17/opinion/joe-biden-nytimes-interview.html

12.

Farkas

Schou

(2018) Fake news as a floating signifier: hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. Javnost—The Public 25(3): 298–314.

13.

Ferrari

(2020) Technocracy meets populism: the dominant technological imaginary of Silicon Valley. Communication, Culture, & Critique 13: 121–124.

14.

Foucault

(1976) The History of Sexuality (vol.1). New York: Vintage.

15.

Frenkel

Kang

(2021) An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook’s Battle for Domination. New York: HarperCollins.

16.

Fursich

(2009) In defense of textual analysis: restoring a challenged method for journalism and media studies. Journalism Studies 10(2): 238–252.

17.

Gillespie

(2010) The politics of “platforms.” New Media & Society 12(3): 347–364.

18.

Hall

(2020) Public penitence: Facebook and the performance of apology. Social Media + Society. Epub ahead of print 2 April. DOI: 10.1177/2056305120907945.

19.

Hall

(1975) Introduction. In: Smith

ACH

(ed.) Paper Voices: The Popular Press and Social Change, 1935–1965. London: Chatto & Windus, pp. 11–24.

20.

Hall

(2011) The neo-liberal revolution. Cultural Studies 25(6): 705–728.

21.

Hall

(2016) Cultural Studies, 1983. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

22.

Haupt

(2021) Facebook futures: Mark Zuckerberg’s discursive construction of a better world. New Media & Society 23(2): 237–257.

23.

Holmes

Bennett

(2018) Why those who have followed Facebook aren’t sure Zuckerberg is sincere. The Philadelphia Inquirer, 10 April. Available at: http://www2.philly.com/philly/business/why-those-who-have-followed-facebook-arent-sure-zuckerberg-is-sincere-20180410.html

24.

Ingram

(2018) “We didn’t spend enough time thinking about the risks,” Zuckerberg admits. Columbia Journalism Review, 2 April. Available at: https://www.cjr.org/the_new_gatekeepers/facebook-interview-zuckerberg.php

25.

Karppi

Nieborg

(2021) Facebook confessions: corporate abdication and Silicon Valley dystopianism. New Media & Society 23(9): 2634–2649.

26.

Koebler

Cox

(2018) The impossible job: inside Facebook’s struggle to moderate two billion people. Motherboard, 23 August. Available at: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xwk9zd/how-facebook-content-moderation-works

27.

Lemann

(2016) Solving the problem of fake news. The New Yorker, 30 November. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/solving-the-problem-of-fake-news

28.

Levina

Hasinoff

(2017) The Silicon Valley ethos: tech industry products, discourses, and practices. Television & New Media 18(6): 489–495.

29.

Levy

(2020) Facebook: The Inside Story. New York: Blue Ridge Press.

30.

Little

Winch

(2021) The New Patriarchs of Digital Capitalism: Celebrity Tech Founders and Networks of Power. New York: Routledge.

31.

McChesney

(2013) Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet against Democracy. New York: New Press.

32.

Maddox

Malson

(2020) Guidelines without lines, communities without borders: The marketplace of ideas and digital manifest destiny in social media platform policies. Social Media + Society 6(2): DOI: 10.1177/2056305120926622.

33.

Marwick

(2013) Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

34.

Mill

(2002 [1865]) On Liberty. Mineola, NY: Dover Thrift Editions.

35.

Moran

(2020) Examining switching power: Mark Zuckerberg as a novel networked media mogul. Information, Communication, & Society 23(4): 491–506.

36.

Nadler

(2019) Nature’s economy and news ecology: scrutinizing the news as ecosystem metaphor. Journalism Studies 20(6): 823–839.

37.

Napoli

(2019) Social Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age. New York: Columbia University Press.

38.

Nieborg

Helmond

(2019) The political economy of Facebook’s platformization in the mobile ecosystem: Facebook Messenger as a platform instance. Media, Culture & Society 41(2): 196–218.

39.

Nolan

(2006) Media, citizenship and governmentality: defining “the public” of public service broadcasting. Social Semiotics 16(2): 225–242.

40.

Pasquale

(2018) Technology platforms and the knowledge problem. American Affairs 2(2): 3–16.

41.

Petre

Duffy

Hund

(2019) “Gaming the system”: platform paternalism and the politics of algorithmic visibility. Social Media + Society 5(4): 1–12.

42.

Phelan

(2014) Neoliberalism, Media and the Political. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

43.

Pickard

(2015) America’s Battle for Media Democracy: The Triumph of Corporate Libertarianism and the Future of Media Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Popiel

(2018) The tech lobby: tracing the contours of new media elite lobbying power. Communication, Culture, & Critique 11(4): 566–585.

45.

Powers

(2012) “In forms that are familiar and yet-to-be invented”: American Journalism and the discourse of technologically specific work. Journal of Communication Inquiry 36(1): 24–43.

46.

Roberts

(2019) Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

47.

Russell

(2019) The new gatekeepers: an institutional-level view of Silicon Valley and the disruption of journalism. Journalism Studies 20(5): 631–648.

48.

Schudson

(1978) Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.

49.

Schulte

(2013) Cached: Decoding the Internet in Global Popular Culture. New York: New York University Press.

50.

Silverman

(2017) A more humble Facebook is deploying charm and its checkbook to win over critics. Buzzfeed News, 9 April. Available at: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/facebook-charm-offensive

51.

Soros

(2020) Mark Zuckerberg should not be in control of Facebook. The New York Times, 31 January. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/31/opinion/soros-facebook-zuckerberg.html

52.

Steiner

(2016) “Wrestling with the angels”: Stuart Hall’s theory and method. Howard Journal of Communications 27(2): 102–111.

53.

Swisher

(2017) I talked to Mark Zuckerberg about his manifesto on the future of Facebook (and the rest of us). Recode, 16 February. Available at: https://www.vox.com/2017/2/16/14637928/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-manifesto-kara-swisher

54.

Swisher

(2021) Brief but spectacular. PBS News Hour, 28 September. Available at: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/brief/391053/kara-swisher

55.

Tamir

Davidson

(2020) The good despot: technology firms’ interventions in the public sphere. Public Understanding of Science 29(1): 21–36.

56.

Tiku

(2017) Selling Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg. Buzzfeed News, 16 April. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/16/selling-facebooks-mark-zuckerberg.html

57.

Tufekci

(2018) We already know how to protect ourselves from Facebook. The New York Times, 9 April. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/opinion/zuckerberg-testify-congress.html

58.

Turner

(2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

59.

Usher

(2016) Interactive Journalism: Hackers, Data, and Code. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

60.

Vaidhyanathan

(2018) Anti-Social Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

61.

Walsh

(2021) “The problem is him”: Kara Swisher on Mark Zuckerberg’s crisis and ours. New York Magazine, 27 October. Available at: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/kara-swisher-on-mark-zuckerberg-facebook-papers.html

62.

Warzel

(2016) 2016: the year we stopped listening to Big Tech’s favorite excuse. Buzzfeed News, 30 December. Available at: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/2016-the-year-we-stopped-listening-to-big-techs-favorite-exc

63.

Zelizer

(2015) Terms of choice: uncertainty, journalism, and crisis. Journal of Communication 65(5): 888–908.

64.

Zuckerberg

(2016) I want to share some thoughts on Facebook. Facebook, 12 November. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10103253901916271

65.

Zuckerberg

(2017) Building global community. Facebook, 17 February. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-zuckerberg/building-global-community/10154544292806634/